Skip to content

Comparison of Minisling Suburethral Sling and Laparoscopic Buch Colposuspension

Comparison of Minisling Suburethral Sling Use and Laparoscopic Buch Colposuspension Application in Terms of Surgical Efficacy and Side Effects in True Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05225168
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-02-04
Start date
2021-07-06
Completion date
2023-03-23
Last updated
2023-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genuine Stress Incontinence

Keywords

Genuine Stress Incontinence, minisling, laparoscopic burch

Brief summary

When the studies in the literature including the mini-sling procedure and the laparoscopic buch colposuspension procedure are examined, it is seen that both methods are successful in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but there is no study in which both procedures have been found to be superior to each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the minisling suburethral sling and laparoscopic buch colposuspension application in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients who will undergo surgical treatment due to genuine SUI.

Detailed description

When the studies in the literature including the mini-sling procedure and the laparoscopic buch colposuspension procedure are examined, it is seen that both methods are successful in the surgical treatment of stress urinery incontinence (SUI), but there is no study in which both procedures have been found to be superior to each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the minisling suburethral sling and laparoscopic buch colposuspension application in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients who will undergo surgical treatment due to genuine SUI. Investigators planned to measure patients' Kings Health Questionary and Prolapse Quality of Life test at first and 6 months after the surgery and to determine how the operation affects the quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic burch colposuspension operation

By pushing the urethra medially, two sutures are placed on the bladder at trigon level and midurethral and suspended on the bilateral iliopectineal ligament and colposuspension is supplied.

PROCEDUREminisling suburethral sling

A vertical vaginal incision is made 1 cm below the external urethral meatus. It is followed by minimal vaginal dissection from the inferior portion of the ascending ramus of the ischiopubic bone to the obturator muscle. The arms of the mesh are fixed on both sides of the obturator internus muscle with the help of a trocar. After leaving a 1-2 mm gap between the mesh and the urethra, the vaginal wall is closed by suturing.

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. To be between the ages of 18-80 2. Isolated genuine stress incontinence or accompanying pelvic organ prolapse 3. Having accepted surgery for stress urinary incontinence -

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Previously undergo pelvic organ prolapse surgery 2. Having a chronic lung disease such as asthma or Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 3. Having juvenile diabetes mellitus 4. History of gynecological cancer 5. Mesh allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
urinary stress test for evaluating objective curechanges in urodynamics test at postoperative first and the 6th monthIn the postoperative period, urodynamics test will be determined at the 6th month and the absence of incontinence will be considered a cure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective continencechanges at postoperative first and the 6th monthPatient satisfaction will be investigated by keeping a urinary diary and questioning the quality of life.
Prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) scalechanges at postoperative first and the 6th monthPatients will be evaluated with the prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) scale. In this scale, the questions are rated 1 to 4, and as the total score increases, the quality of life decreases.
King's Health Questionnairechanges at postoperative first and the 6th monthPatients will be evaluated with the King's Health Questionnaire
Female sexual function scale (FSFI)changes at postoperative first and the 6th monthPatients will be evaluated with the Female sexual function scale (FSFI). In this scale, the questions are rated 0 to 5, and if the total score increases, it means the sexual life is better. A minimum of 2 and a maximum of 36 points can be obtained from this test.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026