Skip to content

10 Year Follow up of RCT Comparing Different Regenerative Regenerative Procedures

Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Human Intrabony Defects With or Without Regenerative Materials 10-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial: Tooth Retention, Periodontitis Recurrence and Costs

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05225142
Enrollment
45
Registered
2022-02-04
Start date
2007-01-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2022-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Brief summary

Evaluate the 10-year stability clinical, radiographic outcomes obtained with the application of the modified minimally invasive surgery to deep pockets associated with intrabony defects.

Detailed description

This 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial (Cortellini & Tonetti 2011) compares three treatment modalities in deep intrabony defects: i) a control group was treated with modified minimally invasive surgical technique alone (M-MIST, N=15); ii) a second group was treated with M-MIST combined with enamel matrix derivative (M-MIST EMD, N=15, Straumann, Switzerland); iii) a third group was treated with M-MIST+EMD plus Bone Mineral Derived Xenograph (M-MIST+EMD+BMDX, N=15, Geistlich, Switzerland) . The design of the original trial has been reported along with the one-year results and the details of randomization and allocation concealment (Cortellini & Tonetti 2011). Clinical outcomes of the three groups were longitudinally followed for 10 years. The 10-year follow-up was approved by the local ethical committee for clinical research of the Health Service of Tuscany (University Hospital of Firenze protocol ATRO2019, registration n° 15106\_oss). All patients gave informed consent to participate into the clinical trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREModified minimally invasive surgery

Surgical intervention alone

PROCEDUREModified minimally invasive surgery with enamel matrix derivative

Surgical intervention with local application of regenerative biomaterial

PROCEDUREModified minimally invasive surgery with enamel matrix derivative and bone replacement graft

Surgical intervention with local application of regenerative biomaterial and bone replacement graft

Sponsors

The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Allocation concealment of surgeon until completion of common part of surgical intervention. Examiner (clinical and radiographic ) and other carers blind to allocation

Intervention model description

Long term follow up of RCT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with periodontitis * Presence of one intrabony defect not extending into furcation * Good general health * Adequate plaque control

Exclusion criteria

* Furcation involvement in the experimental tooth * Inadequate control of periodontitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical attachment level changes10 yearsPeriodontal probing to the nearest millimetre

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probing pocket depts10 yearsPeriodontal maintainability
Tooth survival10 yearsSurvival of treated teeth - Kaplan Mayer
Complication-free survival10 yearsSurvival until first episode of recurrence requiring re-treatment
Cost of recurrence10 yearsTotal cost of managing the regretted teeth including treatment of recurrence
Radiographic bone level10 yearsChanges in level of bone supporting the tooth

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026