Tobacco Smoking
Conditions
Keywords
Smoking Cessation, Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to conduct an open trial examining the feasibility and acceptability of an adapted heart rate variability biofeedback and smoking cessation treatment that was using a primarily virtual remote intervention.
Detailed description
The present investigation is an open trial investigating the feasibility and acceptability of heart rate variability biofeedback smoking cessation treatment (HRVB-SCT) for individuals who smoke cigarettes. Significant findings will also support the expansion of HRVB as a transdiagnostic treatment adjunct that alters cardiac vagal functioning to promote emotional and behavioral regulation, changing the status quo of cognitive-behavioral intervention approaches and decreasing the health and economic burden of smokers who suffer from emotional distress. The goals are to: (a) assess the feasibility and acceptability of the HRVB-SCT intervention (b) assess the efficacy of the intervention in modifying smoking behavior and emotional distress; and (c) collect additional information to inform a subsequent randomized clinical trial.
Interventions
Participants will be provided with six individualized smoking cessation counseling sessions designed to help them prepare to quit, set a quit date, behaviorally manage early abstinence, and to resume cessation upon lapse.
Participants will be provided with seven individualized trainings in resonance breathing using biofeedback to help improve self-regulation.
All participants will be offered up to eight weeks of transdermal nicotine patch, beginning on their quit date.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
This is an open trial with all participants receiving the experimental intervention (HRVB) in addition to smoking cessation therapy and nicotine replacement therapy patch.
Intervention model description
All participants will receive individualized smoking cessation therapy (SCT), nicotine replacement therapy patch (NRT) and heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 21-50 * Smoking ≥ 5 cigarettes, daily, for at least two years * Expired carbon monoxide analysis of breath sample ≥8 ppm * A score of \> 5 on the Readiness to Quit Ladder (i.e., desire to quit smoking within the next 6 months) * Ability to read and speak English fluently * Computer and Smartphone proficient
Exclusion criteria
* Use of other tobacco or nicotine products for recreation or to aid in cessation or use of medication to aid in smoking cessation or currently receiving counseling for smoking cessation * Endorsement of current or past psychotic or manic symptoms indicative of bipolar spectrum or schizophrenia spectrum disorders and/or current suicidal or homicidal ideation * Self-reported pending legal issue with potential to result in incarceration * Plan to move from the New Brunswick, New Jersey area within the next 6 months * Inability to provide written informed consent * Current evidence of another substance use disorder * Severe visual or hearing impairments * Self-reported medical condition or medication use that may be contraindicated for participation in heart rate variability biofeedback training or confound autonomic parameters: Being overweight or obese (i.e., body mass index \> 35); Severe asthma or breathing problems (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, bronchitis); currently pregnant or lactating or plans to become pregnant in the next 4 months; Autoimmune disorder (e.g., multiple sclerosis; under or overactive thyroid); Neurodegenerative disorder (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease); Current use of a psychotropic medication or use of other medication that may affect the cardiovascular system (e.g., mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, beta blockers, benzodiazepines; patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors will be enrolled if on a stable regimen for at least 6 weeks); History of heart murmur or arrhythmia; Pacemaker or other implanted cardiac devices; Heart disease; or Abnormal heart or respiratory parameters including respiration rate \> 20 breaths per minute, extra systoles, or hypertension (e.g., blood pressure reading ≥ 140/90; this may be determined following baseline assessment. Importantly, the presence of any of these exclusion factors, if unknown to the participant would not put them at any risk if they participated in the study, it would simply make the cardiovascular data more difficult (if not impossible) to process and interpret, and * Self-reported medical issues of potential concern to nicotine patch users (i.e., unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or significant cardiac arrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation) in the past 90 days
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Acceptability: Participant Rating of Satisfaction and Liking | Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit) and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU) | Satisfaction and liking will be assessed via self-report items regarding satisfaction with learning the intervention, liking the intervention, breathing techniques, nicotine replacement, and recommending the intervention to others. Items are rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction and liking of the intervention and greater perceived intervention acceptability. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Effectiveness | Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit), and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU) | Effectiveness was assessed via self-report ratings on four items assessing the intervention in terms of helping them quit and manage emotional distress, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived intervention efficacy. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Appropriateness | Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit), and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU) | Appropriateness was assessed via self-report ratings on two items assessing the intervention in terms of comprehension and fit, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived intervention appropriateness. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Ease of the Intervention | Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit) and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU) | Ease of the Intervention was assessed via self-report ratings on three items assessing ease of use and fit into daily lifestyle, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived ease of the intervention and fit into daily lifestyle. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Interventionist Ratings of Technical Issues | 6 weeks | The intervention used several pieces of technology, including remote session delivery via Zoom, smartphone assisted carbon monoxide (CO) monitor and HRVB devices, remote survey administration, as well as in-person use of biofeedback and physiological monitoring equipment. Technological limitations were assessed via self-report items documenting incidences of technical issues during intervention sessions and their related effects on intervention delivery. Items include Yes/No and open-text responses. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Attendance | 6 weeks | Number of intervention sessions attended out of 7 possible sessions. |
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Practice Adherence | 6 weeks | Time (in minutes) spent practicing the breathing intervention |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Smoking Behavior: Quit Day Abstinence | Week 3 (i.e., Quit Date) | Quit day abstinence was assessed via self-reported smoking abstinence on Quit Day and verified via carbon monoxide (CO) analysis of breath sample (CO \< 8ppm). |
| Changes in Smoking Behavior: Sustained Smoking Cessation | Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU) | Sustained smoking cessation was assessed via self-reported abstinence at 3-months post-quit) and verified via carbon monoxide (CO) analysis (CO \< 8ppm) and salivary cotinine levels (\<10 ng/mL). |
| Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | Week 0, Week 3, Week 5, Week 6, and Week 16 (i.e., Baseline, Quit Date, 2-Weeks Post-Quit, 1-Month Post-Quit, 3-Month follow up) | Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) assessed via self-report responses on the Timeline Followback interview were used to measure changes in smoking behavior from Baseline through Quit Date, 2-weeks post-quit, 1-month post-quit, and 3-months follow up. |
| Changes in Total Emotional Distress | Week 0, Week 5, Week 6, and Week 16 (i.e., Baseline, 2-weeks Post-Quit, 1-Month Post-Quit, 3-MFU) | Self-reported change in emotional distress was evaluated via the 21-item, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The DASS-21 is composed of three self-report scales that measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. Items are rated on a Likert-type scale (0=Did not apply to me at all, to 3=Applied to me very much, or most of the time). Scores for depression, anxiety and stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. The severity ratings are as follows Depression: Normal 0-4, Mild: 5-6, Moderate: 7-10, Severe: 11-13, Extremely Severe: 14-21. Anxiety: Normal: 0-3, Mild: 4-5, Moderate: 6-7, Severe: 8-9, Extremely Severe: 10-21. Stress: Normal: 0-7, Mild: 8-9, Moderate: 10-12, Severe: 13-16, Extremely Severe: 17-21. Total scores are computed by summing the subscales. Total scores for the DASS-21 range from 0-63. For all scales, higher scores are indicative of greater emotional distress and less change in total distress symptoms over time. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from the greater Rutgers, New Brunswick community via posters, leaflets, mailings, online advertisements, community outreach (i.e., meetings with local organizations and treatment providers), and listservs. The first participant was enrolled 11/29/2021 and the last participant was enrolled 03/15/2023.
Pre-assignment details
The intervention involved 7 sessions (2 in-person and 5 virtual remote) scheduled over a 6-week period. All participants received individualized heart rate variability biofeedback at each session, smoking cessation therapy during 6 of the sessions, and 8 weeks of transdermal nicotine patches.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enrolled Participants who were eligible and completed the Baseline session | 28 |
| Total | 28 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 9 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enrolled |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 28 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 38.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 25 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 28 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 28 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 28 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 28 |
Outcome results
Intervention Acceptability: Participant Rating of Satisfaction and Liking
Satisfaction and liking will be assessed via self-report items regarding satisfaction with learning the intervention, liking the intervention, breathing techniques, nicotine replacement, and recommending the intervention to others. Items are rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction and liking of the intervention and greater perceived intervention acceptability.
Time frame: Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit) and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who enrolled in the study, n=27 had available data at Week 1 for this measure; Of the n=19 who completed treatment, n=18 had available data at Week 6; n=16 completed this measure at their 3-month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Acceptability: Participant Rating of Satisfaction and Liking | 3.24 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Intervention Acceptability: Participant Rating of Satisfaction and Liking | 3.68 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Intervention Acceptability: Participant Rating of Satisfaction and Liking | 3.45 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
Intervention Feasibility: Interventionist Ratings of Technical Issues
The intervention used several pieces of technology, including remote session delivery via Zoom, smartphone assisted carbon monoxide (CO) monitor and HRVB devices, remote survey administration, as well as in-person use of biofeedback and physiological monitoring equipment. Technological limitations were assessed via self-report items documenting incidences of technical issues during intervention sessions and their related effects on intervention delivery. Items include Yes/No and open-text responses.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: There was a total of 291 intervention sessions where instances of technical issues could have occurred and been reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Interventionist Ratings of Technical Issues | 117 sessions with 1 or more technical issues |
Intervention Feasibility: Participant Attendance
Number of intervention sessions attended out of 7 possible sessions.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Data on the Intent-to-treat N=28 participants who completed the baseline session and were enrolled in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Attendance | 5.32 Sessions | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
Intervention Feasibility: Participant Practice Adherence
Time (in minutes) spent practicing the breathing intervention
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Data on the Intent-to-treat N=28 participants who completed the baseline session and were enrolled in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Practice Adherence | 8.01 Minutes per day | Standard Deviation 6.03 |
Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Appropriateness
Appropriateness was assessed via self-report ratings on two items assessing the intervention in terms of comprehension and fit, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived intervention appropriateness.
Time frame: Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit), and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who enrolled in the study, n=26 had available data at Week 1 for this measure; Of the n=19 who completed treatment, n=17 had available data at Week 6; n=16 completed this measure at their 3-month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Appropriateness | 3.46 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Appropriateness | 3.68 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Appropriateness | 3.28 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Ease of the Intervention
Ease of the Intervention was assessed via self-report ratings on three items assessing ease of use and fit into daily lifestyle, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived ease of the intervention and fit into daily lifestyle.
Time frame: Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit) and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who enrolled in the study, n=27 had available data at Week 1 for this measure; Of the n=19 who completed treatment, n=18 had available data at Week 6; n=16 completed this measure at their 3-month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Ease of the Intervention | 2.70 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Ease of the Intervention | 2.58 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Ease of the Intervention | 2.73 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Effectiveness
Effectiveness was assessed via self-report ratings on four items assessing the intervention in terms of helping them quit and manage emotional distress, rated on a 0=completely disagree to 4=completely agree Likert-type scale. Mean total scores were computed by averaging the items for each respective timepoint. Mean total scores range from 0-4. For this scale, higher scores are indicative of greater perceived intervention efficacy.
Time frame: Week 1 (i.e., treatment initiation), Week 6 (i.e., end of treatment/1-month post-quit), and Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who enrolled in the study, n=27 had available data at Week 1 for this measure; Of the n=19 who completed treatment, n=18 had data available at Week 6; n=16 completed this measure at their 3-month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Effectiveness | 3.02 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Effectiveness | 3.29 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Intervention Feasibility: Participant Ratings of Effectiveness | 2.80 score on scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Changes in Smoking Behavior: Quit Day Abstinence
Quit day abstinence was assessed via self-reported smoking abstinence on Quit Day and verified via carbon monoxide (CO) analysis of breath sample (CO \< 8ppm).
Time frame: Week 3 (i.e., Quit Date)
Population: Of the N=28 who were eligible and initiated treatment, n=22 attended their quit date.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Quit Day Abstinence | 8 Participants |
Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate
Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) assessed via self-report responses on the Timeline Followback interview were used to measure changes in smoking behavior from Baseline through Quit Date, 2-weeks post-quit, 1-month post-quit, and 3-months follow up.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 3, Week 5, Week 6, and Week 16 (i.e., Baseline, Quit Date, 2-Weeks Post-Quit, 1-Month Post-Quit, 3-Month follow up)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who were eligible and attended their baseline session, n=22 attended their quit date, n=20 attended their 2-weeks post-quit session, n=19 attended their 1-month post-quit session, and n=16 attended their 3-month follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | 14.73 Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) | Standard Deviation 7.09 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | 1.14 Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | 1.09 Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) | Standard Deviation 2 |
| 3-MFU | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | 1.12 Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| 3-Month Follow Up | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Reduced Smoking Rate | 3.30 Cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) | Standard Deviation 3.67 |
Changes in Smoking Behavior: Sustained Smoking Cessation
Sustained smoking cessation was assessed via self-reported abstinence at 3-months post-quit) and verified via carbon monoxide (CO) analysis (CO \< 8ppm) and salivary cotinine levels (\<10 ng/mL).
Time frame: Week 16 (i.e., 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 who were eligible and initiated treatment, n=16 attended their 3-month follow-up session.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Smoking Behavior: Sustained Smoking Cessation | 3 Participants |
Changes in Total Emotional Distress
Self-reported change in emotional distress was evaluated via the 21-item, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The DASS-21 is composed of three self-report scales that measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. Items are rated on a Likert-type scale (0=Did not apply to me at all, to 3=Applied to me very much, or most of the time). Scores for depression, anxiety and stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. The severity ratings are as follows Depression: Normal 0-4, Mild: 5-6, Moderate: 7-10, Severe: 11-13, Extremely Severe: 14-21. Anxiety: Normal: 0-3, Mild: 4-5, Moderate: 6-7, Severe: 8-9, Extremely Severe: 10-21. Stress: Normal: 0-7, Mild: 8-9, Moderate: 10-12, Severe: 13-16, Extremely Severe: 17-21. Total scores are computed by summing the subscales. Total scores for the DASS-21 range from 0-63. For all scales, higher scores are indicative of greater emotional distress and less change in total distress symptoms over time.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 6, and Week 16 (i.e., Baseline, 2-weeks Post-Quit, 1-Month Post-Quit, 3-MFU)
Population: Of the N=28 participants who were eligible and attended their baseline session, n=20, n=19, and n=16 attended and completed this measure at their 2-weeks post-quit, 1-month post-quit, and 3-month follow up sessions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Total score | 12.50 score on scale | Standard Deviation 9.76 |
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Depression score | 3.39 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Anxiety score | 3.57 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.67 |
| Intent-to-treat Sample | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Stress score | 5.54 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.48 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Depression score | 3.15 score on scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Anxiety score | 4.80 score on scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Stress score | 7.49 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.42 |
| Week 6 (End of Treatment) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Total score | 15.44 score on scale | Standard Deviation 7.38 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Anxiety score | 5.11 score on scale | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Depression score | 4.89 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.18 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Stress score | 8.16 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.66 |
| Week 16 (3-MFU) | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Total score | 18.16 score on scale | Standard Deviation 10.68 |
| 3-MFU | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Stress score | 8.75 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.85 |
| 3-MFU | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Depression score | 7.06 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.36 |
| 3-MFU | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Total score | 21.50 score on scale | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| 3-MFU | Changes in Total Emotional Distress | DASS-21 Anxiety score | 5.69 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.09 |