Skip to content

A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 2b Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05223868
Acronym
FRONTIER 1
Enrollment
255
Registered
2022-02-04
Start date
2022-02-03
Completion date
2022-12-15
Last updated
2026-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Brief summary

Th purpose of the study is to evaluate the dose response of JNJ-77242113 in efficacy at Week 16 in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

The populations of people living with moderate to severe psoriasis is approximately 3.5 billion which are mostly managed with topical and conventional therapies. JNJ-77242113, investigational drug, targets the immune responses in the body and skin which impacts diseases, such as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and this study evaluates JNJ-77242113 as options of advanced therapies in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The total duration of this study is up to 24 weeks which includes a screening period of less than or equal to (\<=) 4 weeks, a 16-week treatment period, and a 4-week safety follow-up period. Safety will be assessed by adverse events (AEs), clinical safety laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs and physical examinations.

Interventions

DRUGJNJ-77242113

JNJ-77242113 tablet will be administered orally.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablet will be administered orally.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant has a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 6 months prior to the first administration of study intervention * Participant be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis * Participant has a total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (\>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline * Participant has a total Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) \>=12 at screening and baseline * Participant has a total Investigator global assessment (IGA) \>=3 at screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) * Participant has current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium) * Participant have previously received any other therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 23 receptor (IL-23R) (including but not limited to guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab) * Participant has received any therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 17 receptor (IL-17) or interleukin 12/23 receptor (IL-12/23) (including but not limited to secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, or ustekinumab) or has received anti-tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\]-alpha biologic therapy (including, but not limited to adalimumab) within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of the first administration of study intervention * Participant has received agents that deplete B cells (including, but not limited to, rituximab, or alemtuzumab) within 26 weeks of the first administration of study intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0), Week 16Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16At Week 16The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16At Week 16The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, \>1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1Baseline (Week 0), Week 16The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=1Baseline (Week 0) , Week 16The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1Baseline (Week 0), Week 16The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Baseline (Week 0), Week 16PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score=worst pain. Each domain includes 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; SD of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score= more of the concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference and sleep disturbance) indicated worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function and social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From Week 0 through Week 20An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred at or after the initial administration of study agent.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJanssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received 2 tablets of placebo matching to JNJ- 77242113 in morning and 1 tablet in the evening to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in long-term extension (LTE) study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
43
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QD
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received JNJ-77242113 25 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) and matching placebo in morning followed by matching placebo in the evening to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in LTE study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
43
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QD
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received JNJ-77242113 50 mg QD (2\*25 mg tablets) in morning followed by matching placebo in the evening to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in LTE study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
43
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BID
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received JNJ-77242113 25 mg twice daily (BID) in morning and evening along with a matching placebo in the morning to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in LTE study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
41
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QD
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received JNJ-77242113 100 mg QD and matching placebo in morning followed by matching placebo in the evening to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in LTE study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
43
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received JNJ-77242113 100 mg BID in morning and evening along with a matching placebo in morning to maintain the blind from Week 0 through Week 16. At Week 16 participants had the option to enroll in LTE study 77242113PSO2002 (NCT05364554). Participants who were not enrolled in LTE study were followed up for safety up to 4 weeks after the last dose of the study drug at Week 16.
42
Total255

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QD
Age, Continuous43.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
44.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.65
42 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.34
44.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.11
45.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.91
45.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.08
44.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants19 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants233 Participants40 Participants40 Participants37 Participants38 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants49 Participants9 Participants7 Participants7 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants190 Participants30 Participants35 Participants27 Participants31 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
7 Participants35 Participants5 Participants6 Participants7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
8 Participants47 Participants6 Participants9 Participants7 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
3 Participants20 Participants4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, South
1 Participants11 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
8 Participants60 Participants10 Participants13 Participants9 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 Participants9 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
1 Participants13 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants50 Participants11 Participants6 Participants8 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants79 Participants12 Participants11 Participants11 Participants16 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants176 Participants30 Participants32 Participants30 Participants27 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 430 / 430 / 410 / 430 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 4310 / 4315 / 4312 / 418 / 4310 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 430 / 431 / 430 / 412 / 430 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 169.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 1637.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 1658.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 1651.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 1665.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 1678.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-2.4 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 16.51
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-11.9 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 10
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-15.3 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 11.41
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-13.3 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 11.08
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-14.6 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 14.03
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-21.0 Percentage of BSAStandard Deviation 13.74
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16

PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) referred to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.929
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance0.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.099
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-2.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.971
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference0.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.819
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-1.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.238
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities0.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.393
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-0.76 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.469
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-3.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.789
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-2.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.983
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-3.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.709
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance-1.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.859
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function2.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.06
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference-6.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.038
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities4.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.035
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-3.23 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.576
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-5.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.026
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function5.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.896
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance-3.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.947
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities4.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.511
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-1.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.801
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference-7.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.867
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-3.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.676
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function4.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.789
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-5.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.787
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-1.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.569
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance-4.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.041
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities5.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.908
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference-7.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.956
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-2.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.465
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-4.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.57
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference-3.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.889
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function3.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.325
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities5.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.538
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-2.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.818
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.995
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Pain Interference-9.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.668
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Sleep Disturbance-3.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.705
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Depression-3.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.912
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Anxiety-8.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.693
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Social Roles and Activities7.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.607
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Physical Function5.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.408
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16Fatigue-3.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.409
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.002Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.002Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.251Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.087Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.205Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.082Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.01Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.357Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.222Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.987Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.39Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.38Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.349Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.553Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.318Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.207Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.117Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.156Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.019Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.004Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.228Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.034Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.197Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.107Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.606Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.004Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.005Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: =0.005Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: =0.01Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-3.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.436
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-12.76 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.05
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-14.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.528
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-12.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.021
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-13.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.653
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-17.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.356
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.59
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-35.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.22
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-36.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.95
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-34.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.19
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-29.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.28
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16-44.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.22
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-6.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.38
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-38.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.55
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-42.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-41.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.78
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-41.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.65
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16-51.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.01
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
p-value: <0.001Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred at or after the initial administration of study agent.

Time frame: From Week 0 through Week 20

Population: The safety analyses set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs0 Participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs20 Participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs0 Participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs26 Participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs1 Participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs20 Participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs0 Participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs19 Participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs2 Participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs26 Participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 160 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 1611.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 1625.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 169.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 1623.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 1640.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.021Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.038Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1

The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention and had baseline DLQI score \>1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 12.4 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 127.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 137.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 130.0 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 155.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 143.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, \>1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame: At Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 160 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 1616.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 1634.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 1614.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 1627.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 1645.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.009Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame: At Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1611.6 Percentages of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1639.5 Percentages of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1658.1 Percentages of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1651.2 Percentages of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1662.8 Percentages of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1664.3 Percentages of participants
p-value: =0.003Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (\>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 162.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 1625.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 1651.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 1626.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 1646.5 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 1659.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16

PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score=worst pain. Each domain includes 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; SD of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score= more of the concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference and sleep disturbance) indicated worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function and social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function11.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance16.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety30.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference20.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression23.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities23.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue18.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety32.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue20.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression27.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance23.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function23.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference46.5 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities30.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression34.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety44.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function41.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance32.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities46.5 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue23.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference55.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue41.5 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function36.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety53.7 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression26.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance43.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities56.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference51.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression32.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety41.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference41.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function37.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities44.2 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue25.6 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance23.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Pain Interference64.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Sleep Disturbance38.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Depression35.7 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Anxiety54.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Social Roles and Activities57.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Physical Function40.5 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16Fatigue42.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.16Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.008Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Physical Functionp-value: =0.003Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.818Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.179Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.03Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.267Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Anxietyp-value: =0.022Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.62Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.24Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.71Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.341Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Depressionp-value: =0.204Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.786Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.597Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.023Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.438Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Fatiguep-value: =0.017Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.419Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.08Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.421Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Sleep Disturbancep-value: =0.025Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.47Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.023Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.04Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Social Roles and Activitiesp-value: =0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: =0.013Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: =0.004Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: =0.038Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Pain Interferencep-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=1

The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) , Week 16

Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention and had baseline PSSD sign score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=10 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=12.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=114.0 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=19.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=116.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=114.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.317Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.012Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.038Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.011Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1

The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Population: Analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 administration of study intervention and had baseline PSSD symptom score \>=1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 10 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 116.3 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 123.8 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 117.1 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 127.9 Percentage of participants
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 126.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: =0.006Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: =0.005Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026