Skip to content

En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05223491
Enrollment
220
Registered
2022-02-04
Start date
2022-03-17
Completion date
2025-12-19
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Keywords

en bloc, TURB

Brief summary

Aim: To compare the surgical method of En Bloc resection to the conventional transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in terms of complete removal of tumour, specimen quality, and pathological certainty. Background: NMIBC is a common disease with a 5-year recurrence rate reported as high as 64%. The cornerstone in the treatment of NMIBC is transurethral resection (TURB) where the tumour is dissected in pieces, removed from the bladder, and pathologically examined for potential muscle invasion. As the tumour is fragmented before removal, the method violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. Hence, TURB is possibly part of the mechanism causing recurrences. En Bloc resection (EBR), where the tumour is removed in toto, can potentially overcome the flaws of conventional TURB, but large randomized trials are needed. Methods: This project will be a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing EBR to conventional TURB. Patients with suspected NMIBC tumours with largest tumour diameter ≥1cm and ≤6cm will be randomised to either the intervention group, thus undergoing EBR, or the control group, undergoing conventional TURB. The investigators intend to include 220 patients in total, 110 patients in each group. The RCT will be initiated in 2022. Perspectives: If EBR can be shown to remove bladder tumours with better pathological quality and certainty, this could potentially spare patients from undergoing surgeries in the future, thereby reducing costs for both patients and society.

Interventions

Tumour is resected and removed from the bladder in one piece, if possible.

Tumour is resected piecemeal.

Sponsors

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Aarhus
CollaboratorOTHER
Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Demographics: all BMI, smokers and non-smokers * Primary, papillary, non-solid bladder tumour visualised by flexible cystoscopy * Tumour diameter measured on CT-scan ≥2cm ≤6cm at largest diameter * Ability to fully comprehend the information provided and comply with protocol * Signed consent form * Patients with multiple tumours can be included if it seems feasible to resect them in one procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically suspected muscle invasive bladder cancer (invasion in to bladder muscle or extravesical extension visible on CT or solid tumour without papillary elements seen at cystoscopy) * Tumour located in a bladder diverticulum * Investigating physician concludes that en bloc resection is not technically possible * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unaltered pathological T-stage4 monthsProportion of patients with unaltered pathological T-stage following central pathology revision, reTURB, or cystectomy compared to initial T-stage description from TURB.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detrusor muscle in specimenWithin one week from surgeryPrevalence of detrusor muscle in specimen by pathological examination
Recurrence free survival4 monthsProportion of patients with recurrences at 4 months follow-up cystoscopy

Countries

Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026