Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration

Articaine Versus Lidocaine in Only Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for the Extraction of Mandibular Anterior Teeth.Asplit Mouth Clinical Trail

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05223075

Enrollment

Registered

2022-02-03

Start date

2022-11-11

Completion date

2023-03-02

Last updated

2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

buccal infiltration, lidocaine, articaine

Brief summary

assess the effect of articaine versus lidocaine in only buccal infiltration of local anethesia in lower anterior teeth

Interventions

DRUGlidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor

buccal infiltration only of lidocaine local anethesia during extraction of lower anterior teeth

DRUGarticaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictor

buccal infiltration only of articaine local anethesia during extraction of lower anterior teeth

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* medically stable * 18years or older * patient with bilateral lower anterior teeth requiring non surgical removal

Exclusion criteria

* grade 3 mobility * neurological disease * allergy to anethesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
pain during extraction	during extraction	by (VAS) visual analouge scale

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026