Skip to content

Comparison Between Levosimendan and Adrenaline in CABG Patients

Levosimendan Versus Adrenaline in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Elective On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05222256
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-02-03
Start date
2022-03-25
Completion date
2024-05-25
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Open Heart Surgery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare between levosimendan and adrenaline in patients with pre-existing impaired systolic function (EF 30-40%), undergoing elective on-pump CABG, as regards hemodynamics and echocardiographic parameters.

Detailed description

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk of post-cardiotomy myocardial dysfunction. This condition causes delayed recovery, organ failure, prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stays, and an increased risk of mortality. These patients often require inotropic support, which has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Treatment of myocardial dysfunction includes optimization of myocardial contractility through appropriate fluid and pharmacologic management and mechanical support . Extensive use of inotropes in this situation is needed, but the optimal pharmacologic management of myocardial dysfunction in cardiac surgery is a matter of ongoing debate .Available inotropes including adrenaline may increase myocardial oxygen consumption, heart rate and risk of arrhythmia. An increase in myocardial oxygen consumption by inotropes in a state of inadequate oxygen delivery may further deteriorate underlying cardiac dysfunction and even lead to increased mortality . There are questions regarding the ideal inotrope to use during the post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period in patients undergoing on-pump CABG surgery. The occurrence of myocardial dysfunction after cardiac surgery is a potential indication for the use of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer with a unique mechanism of action. By binding to cardiac troponin C, it enhances myofilament responsiveness to calcium, thereby increasing myocardial contraction without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. In addition, levosimendan activates adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels, which are important mediators of ischemic and anesthetic cardioprotection. Levosimendan might thus have a potential benefit for patients with myocardial oxygen imbalance requiring inotropic drug support . The hypothesis of the present study is that levosimendan without loading dose can improve myocardial function and provide better hemodynamics as well as echocardiographic parameters compared with adrenaline in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing op-pump CABG

Interventions

DRUGLevosimendan

Patients in this group will receive levosimendan

DRUGAdrenaline

Patients in this group will receive Adrenaline

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ischemic hear disease * age 18 and 65 years * low left ventricular function (ejection fraction 30 - 40%), * elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Age over 65 years * Patients with end organ failure (renal, liver) * Associated significant valve lesions * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systolic function (EF) will be measured in both groups Levosemindan and Adrenaline in patients with low ejection fraction (30-40%), undergoing elective on pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG).24 hourtransesophageal echo (TEE) will be continuously used to monitor LV systolic and diastolic function during surgery and recordings will be made simultaneously with hemodynamic measurements. LV Ejection Fraction In the transgastric mid-papillary view, the echo machine will be switched to M-mode and the following measurements will be taken: o LV end-diastolic diameter o LV end-systolic diameter The machine will then calculate the LV ejection fraction according to Teich's method

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LV Myocardial Performance (Tei) Index will be measured in both groups24 hourThe left ventricle myocardial performance index will be calculated by placing pulsed Doppler sample volume between the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) in the deep transgastric view. Tei index = (a-b)/b, where (a) = distance between the mitral A wave and E wave, and (b) = distance between the start and end of the LVOT flow)
LV Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output will be measured in both groups24 hourThe LVOT diameter will be measured in the mid-esophagus long-axis view. Assuming that the LVOT is circular in shape, the LVOT cross-sectional area will be calculated . The velocity time integral (VTI) of LVOT will be determined by pulsed Doppler imaging in the deep transgastric view by tracing the LVOT ejection curve. The stroke volume (SV) will then be calculated as: Stroke volume (cm3) = LVOT cross sectional area x LVOT VTI Cardiac output (CO) will then be calculated as CO = SV x heart rate, and cardiac index (CI) will be calculated as CI = CO/body surface area.
LV diastolic function will be measured in both groups24 hourIn the mid-esophageal four-chamber view, E-wave velocity, A-wave velocity and E/A ratio will be determined by placing the sample volume of pulsed-wave Doppler at the tips of the mitral leaflets. Using tissue Doppler imaging, e'-wave velocity will be measured at both the lateral and septal mitral annulus, and the average of both measurements will be reported and used in subsequent calculations. The E/e' index will be calculated

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026