Skip to content

The Effectiveness of an Attention-based Intervention for School Aged Autistic Children With Anger Regulating Problems

The Effectiveness of an Attention-based Intervention for School Aged Autistic Children With Anger Regulating Problems: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05221515
Enrollment
51
Registered
2022-02-03
Start date
2011-01-01
Completion date
2018-10-30
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder, Anger, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Children on the autism spectrum often show aggressive behavior. Treatment can train children to be more aware of their emotions. Investigators studied the effectiveness of an attention-based intervention tailored on aggressive behavior problems and the use of anger coping strategies of school aged autistic children with anger regulation problems.

Detailed description

Investigators studied the effectiveness of an attention-based intervention tailored on aggressive behavior problems and the use of anger coping strategies of school aged autistic children with anger regulation problems. Using a randomized controlled trial (RCT), children were allocated to the attention-based treatment in combination with a psycho-educational parent-training (treatment group) or to the parent-training only (active control group).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAnger can go!

The intervention Anger Can Go! was designed to treat anger regulation problems in autistic children aged 8 to 13 years old. The intervention consists of nine sessions of 60 minutes and is divided in four phases. Phase 1: psycho-education, affect-education and measuring anger with an anger-thermometer. This is a self-report scale presented as the drawing of a thermometer, that allows the child to indicate his level of anger, as linked to specific bodily and behavioral representations on a scale from 0 to 3. Phase 2: making a functional behavior assessment (FBA) and taking a time-out at a low anger-level (between 1 and 2 on the scale 0 to 3) to prevent aggressive outbursts. Phase 3: taking a time-out at a low anger-level (between 1 and 2 on the scale 0 to 3) to prevent aggressive outbursts, shifting attention away from aversive stimuli, to cope with the stress of the anger provoking situation. Phase 4: creating solutions to cope with an anger provoking situation.

BEHAVIORALParent psycho-education

Three psycho-educational parent group sessions (take place before the children's sessions in intervention group). Parents meet with other parents and a therapist to learn about the nature of their Expressed Emotion (EE) and how it relates to the child's aggressive behavior.

Sponsors

VU University of Amsterdam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder * age 8 - 13 * seeking treatment for aggressive behaviour problems

Exclusion criteria

* psychotropic medication still being set

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anger coping strategiesAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentThe Behavioral Anger Response Questionnaire for children (BARQ-C)
Aggressive behavior problems: Arguing, Temper tantrums, Destroying things and Physical violenceAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentQuestionnaire Social Behavior (QSB) measuring behavioral and emotion regulation problems typical for autistic children.
Aggressive behavior problems: aggression as reported by parentAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentThe aggression sub scale from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 36. A higher score means more aggression.
Aggressive behavior problems: aggression as reported by teacherAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentThe aggression sub scale from the Teacher Rating Form (TRF). Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 36. A higher score means more aggression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life of the childAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentPediatric Quality of life inventory (Peds ql): Physical Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning and School Functioning.
Social impairment due to autism symptomsAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentSocial Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 195. A higher score means more impairments.
Parental stressAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentNijmeegse Ouderlijke Stress Index (NOSI). Minimum value: 6, maximum value: 66. A higher score means more stress
Parental well-beingAt week 0, before the intervention group received treatmentSymptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90). Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 360. A higher score indicates a worse well-being.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026