Skip to content

Motivational, Movement and Self-Management Training for Adolescents in Pain

Motivational, Movement and Self-Management Training for Hungarian Adolescents Living With Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05220384
Acronym
M3 Training
Enrollment
96
Registered
2022-02-02
Start date
2022-02-11
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

chronic pain, self-management, adolescent, motivation

Brief summary

With this randomized controlled trial, we have three aims. First of all, to investigate underlying mechanisms that might contribute to the success of a physical activity focused self-management program in paediatric chronic pain. Second of all, to determine the minimum intervention needed for improving physical activity amongst adolescents who live with chronic pain. For this we are comparing an in-person and a video-based motivational interviewing training combined with self-management techniques. Third of all, to investigate the mediating effect of autonomy in adolescents with chronic pain.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIn-person Motivational Interview combined with Self-Management techniques

This is an approximately 30 mins in-person, semi-structured, semi-personalized physical activity focused Motivational Interviewing treatment with self-management techniques. (This therapy is an add on to the "usual therapy" that is given to the adolescents who present at the hospital.) During the interactive treatment a self-management workbook will be filled out by the adolescent for the purpose of further data collection. This in-person therapy at the hospital is followed by two booster sessions via phone at the 1st week post meeting date and 1 month post meeting date.

BEHAVIORALVideo-based Motivational Interview combined with Self-Management techniques

This is a series of three videos comprising a structured activity focused Motivational Interviewing treatment with self-management techniques. The videos' thematic follow the semi-structured interview elements to ensure that it is a true sham of the in-person one. (This therapy is an add on to the "usual therapy" that is given to the adolescents who present at the hospital.) This first video is going to be watched by adolescents at the hospital. During the interactive video-treatment a self-management workbook will be filled out by the adolescent for the purpose of further data collection. The second video is going to be sent to the participants via e-mail on the 1st week post meeting date and the third video is on the 1-month post meeting date.

Sponsors

Semmelweis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 12-18 years * Experiencing pain at least 3 months * Good reading, writing and listening skills in Hungarian language * Self-sufficient * Access to internet and phone * No active cancer.

Exclusion criteria

* Age is not between 12-18 years * Experiencing pain less then 3 months * Not able to read, write and listen in Hungarian * Not self-sufficient * No access to internet and phone * Active cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Child Self-Efficacy Scale3 monthsThe Pain Self-efficacy Scale is a 7item measure assessing child self-efficacy for functioning normally when in pain (PSES-C, PSES-P; Bursch et al., 2006). An example item is "How sure are you that you can take care of yourself when you have pain?" Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with lower scores indicating higher self-efficacy. Initial validation provided support for the measure's validity and reliability, and internal consistency in this sample was strong (a ¼ .90).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale3 monthsPain Intensity cores were anchored at 0="no pain" to 100="unbearable pain", with higher scores reflecting greater pain intensity.
Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale3 monthsDepression, Anxiety The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is a 47-item, youth self-report questionnaire with subscales including: separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and low mood (major depressive disorder). It also yields a Total Anxiety Scale (sum of the 5 anxiety subscales) and a Total Internalizing Scale (sum of all 6 subscales). Additionally, The Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale - Parent Version (RCADS-P) similarly assesses parent report of youth's symptoms of anxiety and depression across the same six subscales.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children3 monthsAnxiety The STAI-CH is the definitive instrument for measuring anxiety in children. Based on the same theory as the STAI, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-CH) distinguishes between a general proneness to anxious behavior rooted in the personality and anxiety as a fleeting emotional state. The instrument is designed to be used with upper elementary or junior high school aged children and consists of two twenty-item scales. The measure is easy to read and can be administered verbally to younger children.
Paediatric Pain Disability Index3 monthsDisability Each of the 7 items is rated on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means no disability and 10 means total disability. PDI results range from 0 to 70 where the higher the score, the greater the degree of disability and impact on life activities due to pain. The PDI is used for initial evaluations and for monitoring pain relief effectiveness and response to other interventions.
Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire for Adolescents and for Parents3 monthsReadiness to change The 30-item PSOCQ-A and -P measures include parallel items rated on a 5-point scale: 1="Strongly Disagree", 2="Disagree", 3="Undecided or Unsure", 4="Agree", 5="Strongly Agree". Greater readiness to change was conceptualized as lower Precontemplation and/or higher Action/Maintenance scores, while less readiness to change was represented by higher Precontemplation and/or lower Action/Maintenance scores.

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026