Skip to content

Testing ALERT With GTO in Middle Schools

Improving the Implementation of Evidence-based Drug Prevention Programs in Schools

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05219422
Acronym
GTO-ALERT
Enrollment
42
Registered
2022-02-02
Start date
2022-08-30
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Substance Abuse

Brief summary

To test the efficacy of Project ALERT with the support enhancement tool, Getting To Outcomes.

Detailed description

This study combines two programs that have been developed by RAND researchers: Project ALERT (PA) and Getting to Outcomes (GTO). Project ALERT is a widely used drug prevention program for middle school youth. Though it has an evidence-base for effectiveness, the program (like most evidence-based programs in schools) is not run with adequate fidelity representing a large gap between what is developed and tested for effectiveness and what is used in actual practice. Thus, the study will conduct an updated randomized controlled trial of PA and test GTO as a tool to increase adoption and adequate fidelity of the program in schools. GTO's previous evidence suggests it could be effective in public schools, yet this remains an empirical question. A successful demonstration of PA and GTO could fundamentally transform evidence-based prevention's delivery, reach, and thus impact, in the US.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProject ALERT

14 session drug prevention program for 7th and 8th grade youth.

The Getting To Outcomes (GTO) implementation support intervention provides technical assistance, training, guides, and tools to improve community-based practitioners capacity to complete tasks associated with implementing an EBP, which in turn leads to improved implementation fidelity.

Sponsors

RAND
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Participants from 42 schools will be randomized to received Project ALERT, Project ALERT + Getting to Outcomes, or waitlist control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligibility for student participants: all students in 7th grade, primarily aged 12-14, attending school at one of the enrolled schools in the study. * Eligibility for school staff participants: all educators interested in enrolling in the study at each of the enrolled schools.

Exclusion criteria

* Not meeting eligibility criteria Note: the age range is from 11 to 70 to account for both the student AND teacher populations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student alcohol and drug behaviorChanges assessed for past year use at each follow-up point from baselineAlcohol and drug use will be assessed for alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, e-cigarettes, prescription opioids, and heroin (lifetime, past month, past year use), allowing us to evaluate program effects on ever, past month, and weekly use. We will assess marijuana and nicotine using items to capture nuanced products (e.g., JUUL/vape pens) and include combinations of marijuana/nicotine products to assess co-use, such as using a vaporizer to vape both nicotine e-liquid and cannabis oil. For alcohol, we will ask questions that allow us to construct 3 alcohol misuse scales: (1) alcohol-related consequences (sum of 5 dichotomous questions on: getting sick, getting in a physical fight, getting in trouble at school, getting in trouble at home, doing something he/she later regretted); (2) high-risk drinking (sum of 3 dichotomous variables: binge drinking in the past month, polydrug use of alcohol and marijuana in the past year, weekly drinking); and (3) overall misuse (sum of above 8 variables).
Student pro-substance use risk factors on consequencesChanges assessed for past year consequences of use at each follow-up point from baselineBeliefs about the short- and long-term consequences (positive and negative). Measures come from the Project ALERT survey posted on the Project ALERT website and utilized in the 4 prior RCTs of Project ALERT.
Student resistance self-efficacyChanges assessed for past year self-efficacy use at each follow-up point from baselineResistance self-efficacy from the Project ALERT survey measures avoiding use of all 6 drugs in risky situations. Measure is posted on the Project ALERT website and utilized in the 4 prior RCTs of Project ALERT.
Student pro-substance use risk factors on perceived normsChanges assessed for past year perceived peer use at each follow-up point from baselineNormative beliefs about the prevalence of use and its acceptability to others, including peers and parents. Measures come from the Project ALERT survey posted on the Project ALERT website and utilized in the 4 prior RCTs of Project ALERT.
Student pro-substance use risk factors on expectanciesChanges assessed for past year use at each follow-up point from baselineExpectations of drug use in the next 6 months. Measures come from the Project ALERT survey posted on the Project ALERT website and utilized in the 4 prior RCTs of Project ALERT.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthew Chinman, PhD

RAND

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREric Pedersen, PhD

University of Southern California

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026