Skip to content

The Comparison of Proprioception and Gait Function Among Different Rotational Designs in Knee Arthroplasty

The Comparison of Proprioception and Gait Function Among Different Rotational Designs in Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05219396
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-02-02
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-24
Last updated
2025-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Balance, Gait, Proprioception

Keywords

knee arthroplasty, rotational design, proprioception, balance function, gait performance

Brief summary

The symptoms of knee osteoarthritis include knee joint pain, impaired proprioception, and etc. Knee arthroplasty is commonly recommended for the patient with severe knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and regain function. But the effects of arthroplasty on the proprioception and gait performance, which were related to the risk of falling, were not fully understood. Recently, the concept of enhancing the rotational movement has been introduced into the design of the knee joint prosthesis for mimicking the kinematic performance of the healthy knee. However, study on the functional performance after using these rotational designed arthroplasties was still scarce. So, the purpose of this study aims to evaluate the differences in the proprioception, balance function and gait performance among different designs of the knee arthroplasties with mobile bearing (MB), medial congruent (MC) and posterior stabilized (PS) design. This study is divided into the retrospective and prospective parts. Investigators will enroll the patients who already replaced their knee joint by one of the above knee arthroplasties for the retrospective part; other patients who plans to receive one of the above knee arthroplasties, twenty participants for each design and each part. The assessment of proprioception, balance function and gait performance will be performed before the knee arthroplasty, and followed at the post-surgery time points of six weeks and three months. The one-way ANOVA will be used to compare the group differences in the retrospective part, and the two-way mixed model ANOVA for the prospective part. Ultimately, the results of this study could help to have better knowledge of the treatment effects from the different designed knee arthroplasties.

Interventions

DEVICEKnee arthroplasty

Your knee should be replaced with mobile bearing (MB), medial congruent (MC) and posterior stabilized (PS) design protheses.

Sponsors

China Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed as knee joint osteoarthritis and will receive knee joint arthroplasty.

Exclusion criteria

* Already receiving a knee joint arthroplasty surgery * Can not walk independently for 20 m * Can not stand for 5 min * With neurological degenerative disease * Lower limb received any surgery within recent 2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee joint proprioceptionPre-operationDegrees
Postural stability indexPre-operationDegrees
Angle of foot during walkingPre-operationDegrees
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMACPre-operationScoring from 0 to 100, and higher scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026