Skip to content

Oropharyngeal Airway and Airway Complications

Influence of Oropharyngeal Airway on the Incidence of Airway Complications Following LMA Removal Under Deep Anaesthesia in Children

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05218707
Enrollment
230
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Complication of Anesthesia

Keywords

laryngeal mask airway, Oropharyngeal Airway, Deep Anaesthesia, Children

Brief summary

Laryngeal Mask Airway has been used in paediatric anaesthesia since the 1990's. Clinical practice in paedeatric anaesthesia for Laryngeal Mask Airway removal varies and there is no standard of care. In children removing the Laryngeal Mask Airway under deep inhalational anaesthesia has some advantages compared to awake, but may be associated with higher rate of complications when Laryngeal Mask Airway is removed in supine compared to lateral position. On the other hand deep anaesthesia may cause airway obstruction due to reduction in tone of upper airway muscles in some patients. An oropharangeal airway may prevent this. This aspect had not been studied before and represent a gap in literature. Study Hypothesis: Airway complications associated with Laryngeal Mask Airway removal under deep anaesthesia are same with or without insertion of an oral airway. Alternate hypothesis is that airway complications be less if an air way is inserted at the end of anaesthesia. Objective: The present study was designed to observe any difference in immediate complication after removal of LMA in supine head down position under deep anaesthesia with or without insertion of an oro-pharyngeal airway. Airway complications that we will observe are desaturation \<92%, stridor, excessive secretions, laryngospasm, retching, vomiting, coughing, trauma to the soft tissues and damage to the teeth.

Interventions

GUEDEL Airway of size '000,00,0,' and '1' will be used.

Sponsors

Aga Khan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I and II patients aged 2-10 years undergoing surgery where anaesthesia with LMA is considered appropriate.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing surgery involving soiling of the airway * Patients with conditions associated with higher incidence of gastrooseophageal reflux * Presence of active upper respiratory tract infection (URI) * Emergency Surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygen saturationDay 1Oxygen saturation \<92% will be considered as complication
StridorDay 1The presence of noisy breathing occurring through obstructed airflow. We clinically measure it by auscultation of the nose, oropharynx, neck and chest.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
laryngospasmDay 1The occurrence of a transient and reversible spasm of the vocal cords. We will evaluate laryngospasm by observing a high pitch inspiratory stridor followed by partial or complete airway obstruction.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactKhalid Maudood Siddiqui, FCPS
khalid.siddiqui@aku.edu+922134862896
Backup ContactShemila Abbasi, FCPS
shemila.abbasi@aku.edu+922134864632

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026