Skip to content

Stress and Sleep Study

Non-pharmacological Interventions to Improve Stress and Sleep Among College Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05218109
Enrollment
76
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
2022-02-09
Completion date
2023-05-29
Last updated
2024-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress, Psychological, Sleep, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Mindfulness

Brief summary

This between-subject, longitudinal pilot study in healthy college students aims to explore the acceptability and preliminary outcomes of two novel and complementary interventions that may improve stress and sleep: transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and a mobile mindfulness intervention.

Interventions

DEVICEtVNS

transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

BEHAVIORALMindfulness

Brightmind mobile mindfulness application

DEVICEsham tVNS

sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

OTHERNumber Puzzle

Control number puzzle task delivered via mobile device

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Undergraduate student (ages 18-30) * Must own a smartphone * Must be able to read and write English

Exclusion criteria

* Major medical illnesses including diagnosed severe neurological illnesses (e.g., stroke, seizure history), medical conditions associated with neurological effects (e.g. heart, kidney disease), autoimmune disorders, and severe psychiatric diseases (e.g., schizophrenia) * Pregnancy * History of brain surgery, tumor, intracranial metal implantation, pacemakers or other implanted devices * History of adverse reaction to electrical nerve stimulation * Prescribed sleep medications and/or psychotropic medications * Illicit or prescription drug abuse within the last two months (marijuana or alcohol abuse \>2 weeks out will be acceptable for inclusion)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of the Combined tVNS + Mindfulness Intervention as Assessed by Participant Self-report of Acceptability Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)Assessed in the tVNS + mindfulness groups and sham + mindfulness groups at Week 2The AIM (Weiner et al., 2017) is a brief 4-item scale measuring the degree to which participants believe an intervention is acceptable. The response scale for each item ranges from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Responses from the 4 items are averaged to yield total scores ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Sleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Assessed at the end of the intervention phase (Week 4)The PSQI (Buysse et al., 1989) contains 19 self-rated items that are combined to form seven component scores, each of which has a range from 0-3 points. For each component, a score of 0 indicates no difficulty, while a score of 3 indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one global score, with a range from 0-21 points (0 = best sleep quality, 21 = poorest sleep quality).
Perceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Assessed at the end of the intervention phase (Week 4)The PSS (Cohen et al., 1994) is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. In particular, it gauges how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. Participants rate each item on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often), and total scores range from 0-40 (0 = least perceived stress, 40 = most perceived stress).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned to study arms/groups pseudo-randomly upon scheduling an intake appointment (prior to enrollment).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
tVNS + Mindfulness
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation plus behavioral: mindfulness tVNS: transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation Mindfulness: Brightmind mobile mindfulness application
15
Sham + Mindfulness
Sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation plus behavioral: mindfulness Mindfulness: Brightmind mobile mindfulness application sham tVNS: sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
17
Mindfulness Only
Mindfulness: Brightmind mobile mindfulness application
20
Control
Control number puzzle task delivered via mobile device Number Puzzle: Control number puzzle task delivered via mobile device
20
Total72

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControlMindfulness OnlySham + MindfulnesstVNS + Mindfulness
Age, Continuous20.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
20.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
19.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
19.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
20.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants9 Participants8 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants11 Participants12 Participants15 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)15.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.95
16.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
14.80 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.15
16.47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.26
14.87 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8.38 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
7.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
8.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
9.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71
8.13 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
18 Participants3 Participants5 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants10 Participants9 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants10 Participants10 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants10 Participants10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 200 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 163 / 200 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability of the Combined tVNS + Mindfulness Intervention as Assessed by Participant Self-report of Acceptability Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

The AIM (Weiner et al., 2017) is a brief 4-item scale measuring the degree to which participants believe an intervention is acceptable. The response scale for each item ranges from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Responses from the 4 items are averaged to yield total scores ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

Time frame: Assessed in the tVNS + mindfulness groups and sham + mindfulness groups at Week 2

Population: Enrolled participants in the tVNS + mindfulness groups and sham + mindfulness groups who completed the Week 2 questionnaires at the appropriate timeframe were included in the analysis. Results are not reported for the Mindfulness only and Control groups, as these participants did not receive the tVNS portion of the combined intervention. Therefore, they did not complete the AIM measure asking about acceptability of the tVNS intervention and data was not available to report on for those groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tVNS + MindfulnessAcceptability of the Combined tVNS + Mindfulness Intervention as Assessed by Participant Self-report of Acceptability Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)4.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Sham + MindfulnessAcceptability of the Combined tVNS + Mindfulness Intervention as Assessed by Participant Self-report of Acceptability Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)3.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Primary

Perceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

The PSS (Cohen et al., 1994) is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. In particular, it gauges how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. Participants rate each item on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often), and total scores range from 0-40 (0 = least perceived stress, 40 = most perceived stress).

Time frame: Assessed at the end of the intervention phase (Week 4)

Population: Enrolled participants who completed the Week 4 questionnaires during the appropriate timeframe were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tVNS + MindfulnessPerceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)11.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
Sham + MindfulnessPerceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)13.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Mindfulness OnlyPerceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)14.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
ControlPerceived Stress as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)16.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.66
Primary

Sleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI (Buysse et al., 1989) contains 19 self-rated items that are combined to form seven component scores, each of which has a range from 0-3 points. For each component, a score of 0 indicates no difficulty, while a score of 3 indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one global score, with a range from 0-21 points (0 = best sleep quality, 21 = poorest sleep quality).

Time frame: Assessed at the end of the intervention phase (Week 4)

Population: Enrolled participants who completed the Week 4 questionnaires during an appropriate timeframe were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tVNS + MindfulnessSleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)6.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Sham + MindfulnessSleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Mindfulness OnlySleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)7.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
ControlSleep Quality as Assessed by Participant Self-report on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026