Skip to content

REmotely Monitored, Mobile Health Supported Multidomain Rehabilitation Program With High Intensity Interval Training for COVID-19

REmotely Monitored, Mobile Health Supported Multidomain Rehabilitation Program With High Intensity Interval Training for COVID-19

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05218083
Acronym
REMM-HIIT-CoV
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
2023-02-23
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, COVID-19, Critical Illness, ICU Acquired Weakness, PICS

Brief summary

Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial providing mobile health supported physical rehabilitation to 120 patients who have been critically ill with COVID-19 and who complete at least one exercise session.

Detailed description

REmotely Monitored, Mhealth (REMM) supported High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) to improve recovery after hospital discharge in patients with COVID-19 will evaluate the feasibility of clinical-, physiological- and patient-centered outcomes associated with a remotely monitored, mobile health-supported high intensity interval rehabilitation exercise training to improve the functional recovery of survivors who have experienced critical illness with COVID-19 and have been discharged home from the hospital.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALREmotely monitored, Mobile health supported Multidomain Rehabilitation Program with High Intensity Interval Training (REMM-HIIT)

REmotely Monitored, Mobile health-supported, High Intensity Interval Training consists of remotely monitored tailored, structured, progressive multidomain physical rehabilitation \& personalized instruction \& coaching. Patients complete 3 structured exercise sessions/week consisting of HIIT, strength, balance, and mobility exercises. Following warmup, patients increase workload at a heart rate corresponding to 95% VO2peak for 1-minute before returning to warm-up speed for 1-minute at a heart rate corresponding to 60% VO2peak. Strength includes functional strengthening exercises for lower extremities \& general resistance exercises for major muscle groups. Balance incorporates static \& dynamic exercises, including progressively narrowing base of support with eyes open or closed, reaching forward \& backward starting within base of support \& progressing to outside base of support. Mobility rehabilitation includes dynamic start/stop while walking and changing direction while walking.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kentucky
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Florida Atlantic University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary diagnosis of COVID-19 requiring hospital admission * Discharged or expected to be discharged directly home from the hospital (not to a skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation center, or long-term acute care hospital) * Able to ambulate with or without a gait aid prior to hospital discharge * Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Hospital discharge \> 60 days unless readmitted to hospital in first 30 days, then 60 day window restarts and new exclusion is last hospital discharge \> 60 days * Not ambulating independently prior to COVID-19 illness (use of a gait aid permitted) * Functional impairment resulting in inability to exercise at baseline * Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study requirements or unable or unwilling to follow coaching via mobile-health iPhone interaction * Any absolute contraindications to exercise, including but not limited to: * Recent (\< 5 days) acute primary cardiac event * Unstable Angina * Uncontrolled dysrhythmias causing symptoms or hemodynamic compromise * Uncontrolled hypertension over 255 mmHg Systolic or 155 diastolic blood pressure * Symptomatic aortic stenosis * Uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure * Acute myocarditis or pericarditis * Suspected or known dissecting aneurysm * Any adverse changes during GXT (i.e., persistent oxygen saturation drop below 88% while on prescribed oxygen therapy or significant hypotension such as mean arterial blood pressure \< 60 mmHg on 2 consecutive readings within 1 minute) * High risk for non-adherence as determined by screening evaluation * Any condition, including cognitive impairment, that, in the judgment of the investigator, precludes participation because it could affect subject safety or ability of subject to complete the study * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 6 minute walk distanceBaseline to 3 month follow-updistance walked in m

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cardiorespiratory fitnessBaseline to 3 month follow-upVO2P obtained during incremental Step Test
Change in physical function measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score.Baseline to 3 month follow-upScores range from 0 (frailty) to 12 (robustness).
Change in 30-sec sit to stand scoreBaseline to 3 month follow-upNumber of times the patient comes to a full standing position in 30 seconds
Change in Fried Frailty Index ScoreBaseline to 3 month follow-upScore ranges from 0 (not frail) to 5 (frail).
Change in cognitive ability as measured by the MoCA TestBaseline to 3 months follow-upScores range from 0 to 30 with a lower score indicating more cognitive impairment.
Change in muscle mass obtained via MuscleSoundBaseline to 3 month follow-upChange in IMAT index as measured by MuscleSound
Compare EQ-5D-5L Score between intervention and control groupBaselineScores range from -0.59 to where 1 is the best possible health state. Negative values represent health states perceived as worse than death, which is equal to 0
Compare Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Score between intervention and control groupBaselineDASI scores range from 0 to 58.2, with a higher score indicating higher functional capacity.
Compare Lawton Score between intervention and control groupBaselineScore ranges from 0 (very dependent) to 8 (high function, independent)
Compare Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score between intervention and control groupBaselineScores ranges from 0 to 21 for both anxiety and depression, with a higher score indicating more symptoms of depression or anxiety
Compare social determinants of health between intervention and control group3 monthsCompletion of the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool. A higher score indicates a higher Health-related social need.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMarjan Cobbaert, MPH
marjan.cobbaert@duke.edu919-668-9740
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPaul Wischmeyer, MD

Duke Clinical Research Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026