Skip to content

Robotic vs. Conventional Minimal-invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair

Robotic Versus Conventional Minimal-invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair - a Prospective, Randomized and Blinded Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05216276
Acronym
ROGER-RCT
Enrollment
182
Registered
2022-01-31
Start date
2022-01-17
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal, Robotic Surgical Procedures

Brief summary

Minimal invasive techniques have become a well established approach for inguinal hernia repair over the last decade in developed countries. Different techniques such as total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) have been described. These studies show comparable results in short and long term outcome. Robotic inguinal hernia surgery enables an even more precise dissection within the preperitoneal layer thus preserving the nerves of the lateral abdominal wall. This may translate into a reduced level of acute and chronic postoperative pain as previously reported by retrospective case series. The role of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repair in regard of postoperative pain and recovery has not been investigated in randomized and blinded clinical studies yet. With this randomized and blinded trial the investigators compare robotic TAPP (rTAPP) to conventional TEP with a decreased pain level shortly after surgery as primary outcome (numeric rating scale - NRS). A reduced postoperative NRS for pain may translate into faster recovery and less chronic pain, secondary endpoints include comparison of pain in a longer course (short-form inguinal pain questionnaire (sf-IPQ)), quality of life / health status (Baseline Short Form-12 (SF-12), Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)), complications (Comprehensive Complication Index - CCI), rate of recurrence, , economic impact in terms of costs of surgery per patient, for the institution, the sick leave and the cost-effectiveness of health intervention (SF-6D, EQ-5D, ICECAP-O). Also included are ergonomics for the surgeon (NASA TLX).

Interventions

PROCEDURETEP

Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair

PROCEDURErTAPP

robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Sponsors

Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Claraspital AG
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

patient and assessor blinded study

Intervention model description

Patients with indication for inguinal hernia repair are randomized to get a robotic TAPP (rTAPP) or a conventional TEP. Results will be compared primarily pain after 24h hours.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years of age and able to understand and give their informed consent for the study. * Primary unilateral or bilateral hernia

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent hernia * with previous open abdominal surgery at or below the umbilicus * need of an open inguinal hernia repair (patient's preference, unable to undergo general anesthesia, unable to tolerate pneumoperitoneum) * liver disease defined by the presence of ascites * end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis * unable to give informed consent * need of an emergency surgery * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain 24 hours post surgery measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10)24 hoursPain at coughing 24 hours after surgery measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) while coughing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain 7 days post surgery measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10)7 daysNRS 7 days post surgery
Pain 30 days post surgery measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10)30 daysNRS 30 days post surgery
EQ-5D-5L (European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension - 5 Level) questionnaire24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 monthsEQ-5D-5L 24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 months; minimum score = 5, max = 25, lower is better
SF-6D (Short Form - Dimension) questionnaire24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 monthsSF-6D 24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 months; minimum score = 0.0, max = 1.0, higher is better
ICECAP-O (ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people) questionnaire24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 monthsICECAP-O 24hours, 7 and 30 days, 6 and 12 months; minimum score = 5, max = 20, higher is better
Intraoperative complicationsDuring surgery
Name and Dosage of pain medication intraoperativDuring surgeryAmount of intraoperative pain medication
Procedure timeDuring surgeryProcedure time
Time in the OR blockDuring surgeryTime in the OR block
Time measured in hours patients are in the outpatient clinic until discharge24 hoursFor day surgery hours in outpatient clinic until discharge
Pain 2 hours post surgery measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10)2 hoursNRS 2 hours post surgery
Pain medication postoperative12 monthsPrescribed and actually taken pain medication postoperative 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Postoperative morbidity30 daysPostoperative morbidity classified according to the Dindo-Clavien classification and scored according to the Comprehensive complication index (CCI) up to 30 days after surgery
Recurrence rate12 monthsRecurrence rate 6 and 12 months postoperative
SF-12 (Short Form)12 monthsSF-12 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months postoperative; The SF-12 Health Survey is a 12-item patient completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)12 monthsCarolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months postoperative; minimum score = 8, max = 48, higher is better
Ergonomics for the surgeon1 dayErgonomics for the surgeon measured by NASA TLX
Costs per patients30 daysCosts for surgery per patient according to the accounting department
Sick leave12 monthsays until resumption of work or days until resumption of activities of daily life, and estimated sick leave by patient
Costs for sick leave12 monthsCosts for sick leave (days multiplied by average daily costs of sick leave in Switzerland according to the Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA))
Type of labor including the relative activity level1 dayType of labor including the relative activity level (sedentary work, light work, medium work, heavy work, very heavy work, retired/unemployed) according to US Code of Federal Regulations § 404.1567 Physical exertion requirement
Time measured in days patients are hospitalized after surgery7 daysFor hospitalized patients postoperative stay in days

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026