Skip to content

A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

Video Intervention to Address Pre-Test Patient Education for Tumor Genomic Testing

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05215769
Enrollment
243
Registered
2022-01-31
Start date
2022-03-30
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Metastatic Breast Carcinoma, Metastatic Lung Carcinoma, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Prognostic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IVA Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IVB Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IV Lung Cancer AJCC v8

Brief summary

This clinical trial tests whether a video intervention improves patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Measuring how the video intervention affects patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with metastatic cancer may help doctors provide patient-centered care by effectively communicating the importance of tumor genomic testing.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To assess change in patient knowledge about tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) following exposure to the video. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I.To assess changes following exposure to the video, including; Ia. Genomic knowledge via the validated 10 true/false question survey (% correct out of 10). Ib. 11-item Trust in Physician Survey (TPS) as a single TPS score. Ic. Comparison of results in three patient cohorts: 1) Metastatic breast cancer; 2) lung cancer; 3) metastatic cancer of unspecified type. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Assess whether therapies prescribed as a result of tumor NGS achieved clinically favorable result through chart review. OUTLINE: Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth Education

Participate in a video intervention

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Complete questionnaires

Sponsors

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have biopsy-confirmed metastatic cancer * Be \>= 18 years of age * Be undergoing clinical tumor or circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) NGS

Exclusion criteria

* Exclude patients who are not English- or Spanish-speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Message-specific Knowledge/Recall AccuracyAt T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)Measured as percentage correct out of 10 questions. Will have 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.47 in change of recall accuracy from pre- to post- video intervention, using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with alpha of 0.05.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Genomic KnowledgeAt T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey that measure objective knowledge of genes/genetics (% correct out of 10). Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Patient Trust of Physician/ProviderAt T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Change in Patient Genomic Knowledge in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Versus Metastatic Lung Cancer (MLC) PatientsAt T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey (% correct out of 10). . Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Change in Patient Trust of Physician/Provider in MBC Versus MLC PatientsAt T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider.. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaniel G Stover, MD

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous63 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino or Spanish
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Race or Ethnicity
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Prefer not to answer
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
62 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
55 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026