Skip to content

Physiological Pacing for AV Block to Prevent Pacemaker-induced Cardiomyopathy

Physiological Pacing vs.Conventional Pacing in the Prevention of Pacemaker-induced Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05214365
Acronym
PHYSPAVB
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-01-28
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2026-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conduction System Pacing, Conventional Ventricular Pacing

Keywords

Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The implantation of a pacemaker and conventional cardiac pacing from the right ventricle (apex or septum) is an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of patients with atrioventricular block and bradycardia.

Detailed description

Pacemaker implantation and conventional cardiac stimulation from the right ventricle is an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of patients with atrioventricular block and bradycardia. But it can cause worsening of heart function, with a significant drop in LV ejection fraction, known as pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Conduction system pacing (either by his or left bundle branch pacing) causes a physiological left ventricular activation through the normal conduction system thus correcting the electrical and mechanical asynchrony caused by conventional pacing. Conduction system pacing may prevent the appareance of PICM. Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year.

Interventions

DEVICEPacemaker implantation and conventional cardiac pacing

Patients will have the pacemaker implanted in the electrophysiology laboratory. Electrode will be implanted (in the apical or septal portion) according to the criteria of the implanting physician.

DEVICEConduction system pacing implant

Right ventricular lead was placed to get his bundle or left bundle branch.

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer
CollaboratorOTHER
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The patient will be explained to be randomized to either one of the two branches. The type of therapy applied will not be communicated to the patient. The follow-up will be the same in the two branches. During the visits it will not be said which therapy has been applied.

Intervention model description

Randomized, unicentric, simple blind.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient must be ≥ 18 years of age. * The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document. * Patients with EF\> 50% and indication for pacemaker implantation due to atrial-ventricular block according to current clinical guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to understand and sign the informed consent. * Patients with severe comorbidities and life expectancy \<1 year. * Patients with severe cognitive impairment or other comorbidities resulting in dependence for basic activities of daily life. * Patients who cannot come to our center to carry out the follow-up of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the incidence of pacemaker-induced heart disease12 monthsPacemaker induced cardiomyopathy defined as appearance of ventricular dysfunction LVEF \<45% or admission due to heart failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in end-systolic volume.12 MonthsVTSVI
Correction of septal flash.12 MonthsCorrection of septal flash determined with echocardiography (M mode)
Incidence of new onset of atrial fibrillation.12 Months
Hospitalization due to heart failure.12 MonthsHospitalization: patient hospitalization (yes/no)
New York Heart Association functional classification.12 MonthsClass I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).Comfortable only at rest. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Pacing thresholds.12 MonthsPacing thresholds.
Total implantation and electrode implantation times.12 MonthsTotal implantation and electrode implantation times.
Adverse events.12 MonthsResulted in reintervention or the termination of significant device function
Six minute walking test.12 MonthsSix minute walking test.
The Quality of Life Scale.12 MonthsThe Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire. The most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with heart failure. Values from 0 to 105 (more is worse).
NT-proBNP.12 MonthsNT-proBNP measure

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTLluís Mont, MD, PhD
lmont@clinic.cat+34 93 2271778
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJose M Tolosana, MD, PhD

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

STUDY_DIRECTORLluís Mont, MD, PhD

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMargarida Pujol Lopez, MD

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026