Skip to content

Laparoscopic-guided TAP Block vs Epidural Analgesia

Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Epidural Analgesia in a Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery. A Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05214261
Enrollment
210
Registered
2022-01-28
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2022-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain

Brief summary

The LAPTAP trial will provide evidence on preferred post-operative analgesia method in elective laparoscopic colon surgery.

Detailed description

In most previous studies TAP-block has been inserted by anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. TAP blockade can alternatively be performed by a surgeon with laparoscopic visual guidance during trocar placement by aiming injection into fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis in the midaxillary line and repeated on the contralateral side. There is lack in studies comparing laparoscopic guided TAP-blockade versus epidural pain analgesia in elective laparoscopic colon surgery exist.

Interventions

OTHERSafety and efficiency of post operative analgesia between laparoscopic-assisted TAP block and epidural analgesia

Patients in the TAP group will be given a laparoscopic-assisted TAP block with a total of 2mg/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine in the bilateral subcostal region into four spots of the bilateral subcostal region, two on both sides of the lateral abdomen between the anterior iliac spine and lower costal arch. The TAP block is performed after the first trocar placement before the insertion of other trocars and the beginning of the surgical intervention. In the control group epidural catheters will be placed using landmark- and loss-of-resistance techniques while the patient is on the operating table. Infusions of 4ml/h containing 0.125% levobupivacaine and 5.5 μg/mL fentanyl will be started with a CADD Solis VIP-infusion pump at the time of anesthesia induction.

Sponsors

Oulu University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

IInclusion criteria * Patients who undergo elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal neoplasia, diverticulitis, and other diseases of the colon and rectosigmal area * Patients able to provide informed written consent * Patients capable of completing questionnaires at the time of consent

Exclusion criteria

* Documented allergic reaction to morphine, hydromorphone, lidocaine, bupivacaine, fentanyl and/or oxycodone * Contra-indication to placement of epidural catheter (spinal stenosis, spinal fusion, elevated international normal ratio (INR), anticoagulation, patient refusal, etc.) or TAP block (patient refusal) * Urgent or emergent surgery precluding epidural catheter placement or TAP block * Systemic Infection contraindicating epidural catheter placement or TAP block * Rectal surgery * Pregnant or suspected pregnancy * Age \< 18 years * Planned open surgery * Planned bowel stoma (protective diversion and/or permanent stoma) * Unwillingness to participate in follow-up assessments * Patients with severe chronic pain * Known sensibility for opioid side effects * i.v.-PCA is contraindicated (for example drug abuse) * No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of post-operative hospital stay after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Up to 1 monthThe primary endpoint in this study is the length of post-operative hospital stay after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative morphine milligram equivalents recruitmentsUp to 1 monthPost-operative morphine recruiments
Visual analogue scaleUp to 1 monthThe scores range 1 to 10. Higher scores indicates worse outcome in the treatment of anelgesia.
Overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS)Up to 1 monthThe scores range 0 - 24. Low OBAS socre indicates high benefit of analgesia
Hospital readmission30 and 90-dayPost-operative readmissions
Overall operating theatre timeUp to 10 hoursOverall operating theatre time
Time to first bowel movementUp to 1 monthPost-operative bowel movement
Time to post-operative mobilizationUp to 1 monthPost-operative mobilization
Overall cost-effectivenessUp to 6 monthsOverall cost-effectiveness
Post-operative complications related to interventions according to Clavien-Dindo classification30 and 90-dayPost-operative complications
Time to first flatusUp to 1 monthPost-operative flatus

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactHeikki Huhta, PhD
heikki.huhta@ppshp.fi+3583152011
Backup ContactJukka Rintala, PhD
jukka.rintala@ppshp.fi+3583152011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026