Skip to content

Cone Beam vs MDCT for Diagnosis and Pre-operative Evaluation of Otosclerosis

Cone Beam vs MDCT for Diagnosis and Pre-operative Evaluation of Otosclerosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05214053
Acronym
CONBEAM OTO
Enrollment
1
Registered
2022-01-28
Start date
2022-01-18
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2022-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otosclerosis

Keywords

Otosclerosis, Cone Beam, Conductive hearing loss

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the Cone Beam and the multi-detector computed tomography for diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation of otosclerosis in patients addressed for conductive hearing loss with intact tympanic membrane. The study aims to show that the Cone Beam offers equivalent performances with lower radiation dosage in this indication

Detailed description

Otosclerosis is an inflammatory bone remodeling disorder of the otic capsule, characterized by spongiotic new bone formation, causing stamped ankylosis that can result in conductive hearing loss. Until now, the gold standard imaging technique for diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation of otosclerosis has been multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Cone Beam computed tomography is a relatively recent imaging modality. It is associated with a lower radiation dosage compared to MDCT, and a high spatial resolution that allows a more precise analysis of bone structures. During the last 15 years, its use has been increasingly common in odontology and craniofacial surgery. Several studies have already studied the utility of Cone Beam for temporal bone pathologies, including recent retrospective studies that showed satisfying diagnostic performances for otosclerosis. Up to now, very few prospective studies have compared those two imaging modalities for otosclerosis diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation. Therefore, those two exams will be performed in patients addressed to the hospital for conductive hearing loss with intact tympanic membrane. Thus, the performance of Cone Beam will be compared to MDCT, regarding the positive diagnosis of otosclerosis, the analysis of anatomical structures of the temporal bone for pre-operative evaluation, and also the benefits in terms of irradiation. The MDCTs will include fewer slices than routine MDCTs and will be centered on the area of interest, in order to keep a total radiation dosage smaller or equivalent to routine care

Interventions

Each patient will undergo a Cone Beam CT and a MDCT

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (18 years and older) * Requiring radiological assessment for conductive hearing loss with intact tympanic membrane, confirmed by otoscopy and audiogram * Signed informed consent * Affiliated or beneficiary of health insurance

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of otosclerosis on the MDCT * History of middle ear surgery * Pregnancy, breast feeding women and women who are of childbearing age and not practicing adequate birth control * Patient under legal protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
False negative rate of Cone Beam for the diagnosis of otosclerosis1 dayFalse negative rate of Cone Beam for the diagnosis of otosclerosis, compared to MDCT (gold standard).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
radiologic grades of otosclerosis1 dayDescription of the radiologic grades of otosclerosis, based on Veillon's classification
extension to round window1 dayThe parameter that will be assessed is the presence/absence of a bony hypodensity located on the round window bony structure . CT will be considered as gold standard. CBCT may be less or equally accurate to detect this small hypodensity area structure
Existence of a bone canal around the labyrinthine portion of the facial nerve1 dayThe parameter that will be assessed is the presence /absence of a bony structure covering the VIIth nerve a the level of the oval window. CT will be considered as gold standard. CBCT may be less or equally accurate to detect this very thin bony structure , or even better in case of better detection
radiation dosage1 dayComparison of radiation dosage between Cone Beam and MDCT

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026