Skip to content

Clinical Relevance of Different Training Intensities in Chronic Heart Failure.

Clinical Relevance and Prognostic Outcomes of Different Training Intensities for Cardiac Remodeling in Chronic Heart Failure.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05213546
Enrollment
45
Registered
2022-01-28
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2021-10-01
Last updated
2022-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Heart Failure

Brief summary

To determine the efficacy of different aerobic exercise training intensities in patients with chronic heart failure.Forty five eligible male patients with chronic heart failure were randomly assigned into three groups( High intensity , moderate intensity and low intensity)groups .

Detailed description

Forty five eligible male patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic heart disease were selected from National Heart Institute heart failure outpatient clinic , their ages ranged from 50-60 years old and their ejection fraction ranged from 30-40% ,they were randomly assigned into three groups :HIT Group: received High Intensity aerobic Training in the form of bicycle ergometer exercise for the lower limbs three times /week for three months.(n=15) MIT Group: received moderate Intensity aerobic Training in the form of bicycle ergometer exercise for the lower limbs three times /week for three months. .(n=15) LIT Group: received low Intensity aerobic Training in the form of bicycle ergometer exercise for the lower limbs three times /week for three months, Before and after intervention, the following measures were obtained: Echocardiograph parameter (EF%, and left ventricular internal dimension ) , prognostic biomarkers (proBNP), and quality of life .

Interventions

OTHERAerobic exercise training

bicycle ergometer exercise training

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with following criteria were included : * All patients ages were between 50 - 60 years old * Fractional shortening \< 25% and ejection fraction \< 40% * Sinus rhythm. * Heart Failure due to ischemic heart disease. * New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III. * Regular medical treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with following criteria were excluded : * Chronic heart failure due to other causes * History of pulmonary disease (chronic obstructive lung disease, moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension). * Recent acute coronary syndrome or revascularization (3 months). * Exercise limited by angina or peripheral arterial occlusive disease; * Cerebrovascular or musculoskeletal disease preventing exercise testing or training. * Poorly controlled or exercise-induced cardiac arrhythmias * Logistic problems to attend regular exercise training sessions. Uncontrolled hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ejection fractionchange from baseline to after 12 weeksrepresents left ventricular function measured by pulsed echocardiography
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP)change from baseline to after 12 weeksbiomarker for heart failure measured by analysis of venous samples drawn

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF):change from baseline to after 12 weeksQuestionnaire for measuring quality of life of heart failure patients

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026