Skip to content

Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05213351
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-01-28
Start date
2022-04-25
Completion date
2023-07-20
Last updated
2023-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis

Keywords

frozen shoulder, exercise, graded motor imagery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different exercise programs in patients with frozen shoulders.

Detailed description

After being informed about the study, all patients giving written informed and meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized a double-blind manner in a 1:1 (participant and investigator) to graded motor imagery or exercise group.

Interventions

Graded Motor Imagery program will be performed two times a week for six consecutive weeks and will include the following three steps: laterality training, imagined movements, and mirror therapy. 1. Right-left discrimination training (lateralization training) 2. Imagination of hand movements (motor imagery): 3. Mirror therapy Treatments including traditional physiotherapy approaches; joint mobilizations, stretching, scapula focused exercises etc.

OTHERExercise

Treatments including traditional physiotherapy approaches; joint mobilizations, stretching, scapula focused exercises etc.

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged \>60 years * Patients with shoulder pain of at least six months' duration secondary to tendinopathy and/or partial rotator cuff tear; * Patients with ability to follow simple orders; iii) * Patients with ability to sign to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Normal passive ROM * External ROM \< 30 * To have received treatment (physiotherapy, intra-articular injection, surgery) related to the existing complaint * Pain \< 3 according to the numbered pain assessment scale

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting. The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline range of motion at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekRange of motion is the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements.
Change from baseline QuickDASH at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe purpose of the QuickDASH is to use 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
Change from baseline NPRS at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain.
Change from Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain.
Change from SF-12 at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure.
Change from baseline two-point discrimination at 6th and 8th weekBaseline,6th week and 8th weekThe two-point discrimination test is used to assess if the patient is able to identify two close points on a small area of skin, and how fine the ability to discriminate this are. It is a measure of tactile agnosia, or the inability to recognize these two points despite intact cutaneous sensation and proprioception.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026