Skip to content

Weaning From Nasal High Flow Therapy

Weaning From Nasal High Flow Therapy: an Explorative Study Assessing the Usefulness of the ROX Index to Predict Outcome of the Weaning Process in Combination With a Withdrawal Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05210881
Enrollment
62
Registered
2022-01-27
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2021-08-31
Last updated
2022-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Weaning Failure

Keywords

nasal high flow oxygen, withdrawal from nasal high flow therapy, ROX index, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, withdrawal trial

Brief summary

Nasal high flow is widely used in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It has been shown to improve patient comfort, increase oxygenation and reduce need for intubation in some patients. The Respiratory Oxygenation (ROX) index has been established as a simple tool to help clinicians identify those patients who will succeed and those who will fail under nasal high flow and therefore predict the need for intubation. However, when nasal high flow therapy is successful, little is known as to how and when weaning of this device should be performed and what are the predictors of a safe withdrawal of the device. The objectives of this retrospective exploratory study are to identify a cut-off value of the ROX index predictive of success of the withdrawal trial, to describe a one-year use of the withdrawal trial; to describe the ROX value closest to weaning from nasal high flow, and to identify factors associated with success or failure of the withdrawal trial from nasal high flow therapy in patients receiving nasal high flow therapy.

Detailed description

Although nasal high flow is widely used in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and its benefits have been shown in multiple studies, little is known as to how and when weaning from the technique device should be performed and what are the predictors of a safe withdrawal. The Respiratory Oxygenation (ROX) index was established and tested to predict outcome of nasal high flow therapy in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. It combines three parameters available at the bedside that reflect patient's respiratory status: respiratory rate, the level of the inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Importantly, the combination of these three parameters outweighed the performance of each parameter taken separately to predict nasal high flow therapy outcome. Since its initial publication, several studies coming from different countries have confirmed the potential for the ROX index to predict need for intubation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, thus making a valuable tool accessible to everyone, including nurses, to monitor on a routine basis. Because it reflects the patient's respiratory status, the greater the score, the better the patient's condition. Hence, one may hypothesize that, at the other end of the spectrum of respiratory failure (i.e., at the stage of weaning and withdrawal of the high flow device when the patient has considerably improved), the ROX index may also help identify those patients who will be successfully separated from the nasal high flow support. To date, one study has suggested that among several parameters, the value of the ROX index could be associated with successful cessation of nasal high flow. Here, in a retrospective exploratory study, investigators aim to to identify a cut-off value of the ROX index predictive of success of the withdrawal trial, to describe a one-year use of the withdrawal trial (average duration of use of nasal high flow before weaning, number of weaning trials, number of failed and successful weaning trials.); to describe the ROX value closest to weaning from nasal high flow, and to identify factors associated with success or failure of the withdrawal trial from nasal high flow therapy in patients receiving nasal high flow therapy; A successful withdrawal is defined as the withdrawal of nasal high flow without necessity of placing the patient back on nasal high flow within the following 24h. A failed withdrawal is defined by the need to resume nasal high flow within the 24h hours following the withdrawal. The possible identification of a cut-off value may help clinicians initiate earlier weaning from nasal high flow.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hôpital Louis Mourier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- ICU patient treated with nasal high flow

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 years * concomitant treatment with non-invasive ventilation * acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Value of the Respiratory Oxygenation index (ROX) at nasal high flow withdrawalthrough each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24hoursthe ROX index the closest to the time at which nasal high flow is withdrawn will be recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
use of nasal high flow before weaningthrough each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hoursaverage duration of nasal high flow therapy before initiating a withdrawal trial (in hours)
number of withdrawal trialsthrough each nasal high flow therapy, that lasts an average of 24 hoursthe number of trials each patient will have performed will be recorded
number of patients who failed a withdrawal trialthroughout study duration which is a one-year periodwithdrawal failure is defined by patients who required to be placed back on nasal high flow after withdrawal of the high flow device within 24 hours of withdrawal.
number of patients who succeeded a withdrawal trialthroughout study duration which is a one-year periodwithdrawal success is defined by patients that have not required to be placed back on nasal high flow after withdrawal of the high flow device within 24 hours of withdrawal.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026