Depressive Disorder, Major
Conditions
Keywords
Escitalopram, Cytochrome p 450 cyp2c19, Precision medicine, Psychiatry, Pharmacogenetics, Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Brief summary
The aims of this study are to: 1. Determine the proportion of participants who are underdosed or overdosed under recommended dosing regimen of escitalopram for the depression treatment (10 mg/day) 2. Determine and quantify clinical benefits of personalized escitalopram dosing regimen based on the escitalopram blood level monitoring 3. Retrospectively estimate whether the information on CYP2C19 genotype is useful in the prediction of escitalopram blood level.
Detailed description
Escitalopram is an antidepressant extensively metabolized by the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme. Based on CYP2C19 genotype, patients can be classified either as: * Normal metabolizers (Normal CYP2C19 enzyme capacity) * Intermediate metabolizers (Decreased CYP2C19 enzyme capacity) * Poor metabolizers (Absent CYP2C19 enzyme capacity) * Ultra rapid metabolizers (Increased CYP2C19 enzyme capacity) Adequate escitalopram exposure is needed to achieve optimal clinical response in the treatment of depression: too low drug plasma levels can lead to the lack of pharmacological effect, whereas too high drug plasma levels increases the incidence of adverse effects. There is evidence that patients with variant CYP2C19 genotypes have abnormal escitalopram exposure and could benefit from escitalopram dose personalization, but precise evidence-based protocol for personalized dosing of escitalopram has not been developed yet. This multicentric observational clinical trial is designed to collect crucial information for the development of such protocol that will be based on drug plasma level monitoring and/or CYP2C19 genotyping. The course of the study will be as follows: Initial Visit (V0): Participant will be enrolled at this point if inclusion criteria are met. Escitalopram therapy will be initiated at the standard dose of 10 mg/day during next 2 weeks, or alternatively, started with 5 mg/day during first week and then increased to 10 mg/day during second week. General and socio-demographic information about the participant will be collected together with the baseline measurements: clinical questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, cardiology assessments, and the blood sample will be taken for biochemical analyses. Mid-Visit (VK): This visit takes place two weeks after the initial visit (V0) when escitalopram blood level is expected to reach the steady state. Blood sample will be taken from the participants at the end of the dose interval (before the morning dose) for the purpose of therapeutic drug monitoring. Plasma escitalopram levels will then be measured before the next visit and an independent clinician will allocate patients into one out of two cohorts based on whether or not escitalopram levels were optimal (25 - 50 ng/ml). If escitalopram levels were outside this interval, independent clinician will adjust the dose; escitalopram level lower than 5 ng/ml indicates noncompliance and results in dropout, level between 5 and 15 ng/ml results in dose increase to 20 mg/day, level between 15 and 25 ng/ml results in dose increase to 15 mg/day, level between 25 and 50 ng/ml results in treatment continuation with 10 mg/day, and level higher than 50 ng/ml results in dose decrease to 5 mg/day. Visit 1 (V1): Visit 1 takes place two weeks after VK and 4 weeks after the initiation of the escitalopram therapy. Without the knowledge of the attending clinician, independent clinician will adjust escitalopram doses accordingly. Attending clinician will then assess the participants using standardized questionnaires, participants will be anthropometrically and cardiologically examined, and blood samples will be taken for the purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring and biochemical analyses. Visit 2 (V2): Visit 2 is the final follow-up visit and it will be performed 4 weeks after the Visit 1 and 8 weeks after the escitalopram initiation. All participants will be assessed for psychometrical, anthropometrical and cardiological parameters, and blood samples will be taken again for the purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring and biochemical analysis. If needed, additional participants, who are already on the stable escitalopram monotherapy, can be enrolled into study starting from VK. In this case, besides the blood sample for the therapeutic drug monitoring, all assessment usually done at initial visit (V0) will be performed during VK.
Interventions
DRUGEscitalopram
Escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), is commercially known as ELORYQA®, Elicea®, Escital®,PRAMES® or Lata® in Serbia. The recommended dose for Major depressive disorder is 10mg/day. Based on the individual response, dose can be adjusted and the maximum dose is 20 mg/day; 5 mg/day dose is also available. Escitalopram is also indicated for treatment of Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Generalized anxiety disorder, Social anxiety disorder (Social phobia) and Panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) by Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia. In known CYP2C19 poor metabolizers, initial dose should be 5mg/day during first 2 weeks, and based on the individual response it can be increased up to maximum of 10 mg of escitalopram per day, according to the guidelines of Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia.
Sponsors
Clinical Centre of Serbia
Institute of Mental Health, Serbia
Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
University of Belgrade
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosed Major Depressive Disorder * Starting monotherapy with escitalopram * Signed written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patient's requests to leave the study * Patients who had taken escitalopram before * Dementia * Severe liver function impairment (abnormal AST/ALT ratio) * Severe kidney function impairment (abnormal creatinine clearance) * History of drug addiction (sporadic use is permitted) * Suicide risk * Patients who are taking strong CYP2C19 inhibitors * Severe adverse drug reaction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline Depression severity score at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with clinician reported 21-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D). Scale gives a score from 0 to 52 where higher score represents higher depression severity and worse outcome. |
| Adverse drug reaction severity score at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with clinician reported UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser) side effect rating scale. Scale gives summary score from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to the greater side-effects severity and worse outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with escitalopram plasma concentrations outside the therapeutic window | at Week 2 | Therapeutic window is defined by escitalopram plasma concentrations of 25-50 ng/ml |
| Retrospectively determined regression formula for prediction of escitalopram plasma levels at Vk based on CYP2C19 metabolizer status | 8 Weeks | CYP2C19 metabolizer status will be determined based on genotype as follows: Poor metabolizer: \*2/\*2, \*2/\*3, \*3/\*3 Intermediate metabolizer: \*1/\*2, \*1/\*3 Normal metabolizer: \*1/\*1 Ultra-rapid metabolizer: \*1/\*17, \*17/\*17 Several covariates will be considered: Body mass index, Creatinine clearance, AST/ALT ratio (Aspartate aminotransferase/Alanine aminotransferase) |
| Change from Baseline Depression severity score at week 4 | 4 Weeks | Assessed with 21-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D). Scale gives a score 0-52 where higher score is equivalent to the more severe depression and worse uotcome. |
| Adverse drug reaction severity score at week 4 | 4 Weeks | Measured with clinician reported UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser) side effect rating scale. Scale gives summary score from 0 to 3 where higher scores correspond to the greater side-effects severity and worse outcome. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of illness score at baseilne | Baseline | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale for the severity of illness (CGI-S). Scale gives scores from 0 to 7 where higher scores correspond to the higher illness severity and worse outcome. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of illness score at week 4 | 4 Weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale for the severity of illness (CGI-S). Scale gives scores from 0 to 7 where higher scores correspond to the higher illness severity and worse outcome. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of illness score at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale for the severity of illness (CGI-S). Scale gives scores from 0 to 7 where higher scores correspond to the higher illness severity and worse outcome. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) global improvement score at week 4 | 4 weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale for the global improvement (CGI-I). Scale gives scores from 0 to 7 where higher scores correspond to the worse illness improvement and worse outcome. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) global improvement score at week 8 | 8 weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale for the global improvement (CGI-I). Scale gives scores from 0 to 7 where higher scores correspond to the worse illness improvement and worse outcome. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Efficacy index at week 4 | 4 weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale - Efficacy index (CGI-E). Scale gives scores from 1 to 5 where higher scores correspond to the better outcome and beneficial drug efficacy/tolerability ratio. |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Efficacy index at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with Clinical Global Impression scale - Efficacy index (CGI-E). Scale gives scores from 1 to 5 where higher scores correspond to the better outcome and beneficial drug efficacy/tolerability ratio. |
| Questionnaire of early childhood and recent traumatic experiences | Baseline | Self-reported 13 item questionnaire by Pennebaker, J.W. & Susman, J.R. (1988) |
| Perception of stress score at baseline | Baseline | Measured with self-reported Perceived stress scale (PSS). Scale gives scores from 0 to 40 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of perceived stress and worse outcome. |
| QT interval at week 4 | 4 Weeks | Determined on the electrocardiogram |
| QT interval at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Determined on the electrocardiogram |
| Cortisol plasma levels at Baseline | Baseline | — |
| Cortisol plasma levels at week 4 | 4 Weeks | — |
| Cortisol plasma levels at week 8 | 8 Weeks | — |
| Employment status | Baseline | Coded as follows: 1. Unemployed, 2. Employed; monthly incomes \<40 000 RSD (\ 385$), 3. Employed; monthly incomes 40 000-80 000 RSD (\ 385$-770$), 4. Employed; monthly incomes \>80 000 RSD (\ 770$). |
| Marital status | Baseline | Coded as follows: 1. Unmarried, 2. Married, 3. Divorced, 4. Widowed |
| Education level | Baseline | Coded as follows: 1. Primary education (8 years), 2. High school diploma (8+3 or 8+4 years), 3. Associate's degree (8+4+2 or 8+4+3 years), 4. Bachelor's degree (8+4+4 years) or higher |
| QT interval at baseline | Baseline | Determined on the electrocardiogram |
| Perception of stress score at week 4 | 4 Weeks | Measured with self-reported Perceived stress scale (PSS). Scale gives scores from 0 to 40 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of perceived stress and worse outcome. |
| Perception of stress score at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with self-reported Perceived stress scale (PSS). Scale gives scores from 0 to 40 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of perceived stress and worse outcome. |
| Anxiety symptoms severity score at baseline | Baseline | Measured with Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A). Scale gives scores from 0 to 56 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of anxiety symptoms and worse outcome. |
| Anxiety symptoms severity score at week 4 | 4 weeks | Measured with Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A). Scale gives scores from 0 to 56 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of anxiety symptoms and worse outcome. |
| Anxiety symptoms severity score at week 8 | 8 Weeks | Measured with Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A). Scale gives scores from 0 to 56 where higher scores correspond to the higher severity of anxiety symptoms and worse outcome. |
Countries
Serbia
Contacts
Primary ContactMarin M Jukić, PhD
Outcome results
None listed