Skip to content

Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to Suxamethonium During ECT on the Sensitization to NMBA and the Development of Protective Antibodies

Impact of Closely Grouped, Iterative Exposures to Suxamethonium During Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on the Sensitization to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) and the Development of Protective Antibodies

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05210062
Acronym
SismoSens
Enrollment
70
Registered
2022-01-27
Start date
2022-01-27
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2022-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Hallucinations, Mania

Keywords

Electroconvulsive therapy, Depressive disorders, Sensitization, Protective antibodies, Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA), Suxamethonium

Brief summary

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions in France are Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). The mechanism of immunization to NMBA is not yet understood. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020. ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available.

Detailed description

Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions are different types of Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) in 60% of cases. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction (anaphylaxis). Anaphylactic reactions are classically described as IgE-dependent, triggered by the allergen which, by bridging specific IgE antibodies on the surface of mast cells and basophils, induces a massive release, in particular of histamine, which is responsible for the symptoms. Other immunological mechanisms, in particular by specific IgGs, have been described. The mechanism of immunization to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) is not yet understood. The quaternary ammonium group (AQ) is the common epitope of NMBA recognized by IgE. Due to the absence of previous exposure to NMBA reported in 50% of patients with HSA-PA to NMBA, other substances carrying substituted AQ ions are suspected of inducing cross-sensitization, such as household cleaners, cosmetics or drug (pholcodine). However, the sensitizing role of NMBA themselves is not established, and no study has analyzed iterative exposure to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) as a sensitizing factor. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a long-standing therapeutic approach still widely used today, for its high efficiency, particularly in depressive syndromes resistant to antidepressants. It has an efficacy comparable (or even superior) to pharmacological treatments and improves the mortality associated with this disease. Treatment with iterative ECT sessions includes an attack phase with an average of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with secondary spacing of sessions before switching to antidepressant treatment. These sessions are carried out in the operating room under general anesthesia, thanks to a hypnotic and a NMBA, suxamethonium, as recently recommended by the French Anesthesiology Society in 2020. ECT therefore represent an interesting model of iterative exposure of a relatively homogeneous population to a single highly sensitizing substance, which could make it possible to study the evolution of sensitization as a function of various factors, in particular cumulative exposure, for which no data is currently available. A single patient group is planned in this study, consisting of patients with a medical indication for ECT for psychiatric pathologies resistant to medical treatment (depression, mania, hallucinatory episode in particular). The study will take place in two parts: a preliminary phase phase P in 10 patients (with previous exposure to ECT) and a phase E study phase in 60 patients. For phase E, only patients with first-time access to ECT or without ECT in the previous ten years will be eligible.

Interventions

OTHERIterative exposure to suxamethonium during ECT sessions

The study is divided into 2 phases: phase P and phase E. Phase P: 10 patients to be included in 1 month with a unique dose of suxamethonium during one session of ECT. One blood sample will be taken from patients before their index ECT session. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility of antibody detection relative to the main objective of the study, to ensure the number of patients to include in phase E (analysis in the following month). Depending on the frequency of antibodies detected, particularly IgG4, the number of patients required for phase E will be revised. If no antibodies are detected, the study will be discontinued. Phase E: 60 patients to be included in 12 months with 5 blood samples: before the first session of ECT (S0), at 2 weeks (S2), at 4 weeks (S4), between 6 - 14 weeks (preferably at S10) and at 6 months (M6). Only first-time patients or those not having been exposed to ECT in the past 10 years will be included in this phase.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient requiring iterative exposure to ECT as part of their psychiatric pathology in one of the investigator center * Patient who has not had ECT in the last 10 years for the phase E group, regardless of their previous ECT exposure for the phase P group * Patient who has been informed and has signed the consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of written informed consent * Allergies identified specifically to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) * Patient under tutelage, curatorship or judicial protection * Patient without social security * Contraindication to ECT : intracranial hypertension, intracranial lesions without intracranial hypertension, recent episode of cerebral hemorrhage, recent myocardial infarction or embologenic disease, presence of aneurysms or vascular malformations at risk of hemorrhage, retinal detachment, pheochromocytoma, history of ineffective treatment with ECT having had serious side effects, taking anticoagulant treatments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the development of specific antibodies against suxamethonium (type IgG4 anti-suxamethonium) after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksDevelopment of specific antibodies against suxamethonium
Incidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium assessed by the presence of specific anti-suxamethonium IgG4 antibodies (via ImmunoCAP method) following iterative exposure to ECT after 10 weeks.10 weeksIncidence of protective antibodies against suxamethonium

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksDevelopment of specific IgE antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksDevelopment of specific IgE antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG4 antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG4 antibodies
Evaluate the development of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksDevelopment of specific IgG4 antibodies
Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksEvolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksEvolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksEvolution of anti-suxamethonium IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksEvolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksEvolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksEvolution of anti-quaternary ammoniums IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksEvolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 4 weeks.4 weeksEvolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratioIgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio, described as an evaluation factor during desensitization procedures before exposure to ECT at 10 weeks.10 weeksEvolution of anti-rocuronium IgE/IgG4 ratio
Evaluate the evolution of polarization of memory T cells before and after iterative exposure to ECT at 10 weeks via flow cytometry after re-stimulation with NMBA.10 weeksEvolution of polarization of memory T cells
Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) before the first exposure to ECT.Week 0Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors
Evaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors (IL-10, IL-4, TGF-beta) at 10 weeks.10 weeksEvaluate circulating concentrations of tolerogenic factors
Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgE.18 monthsCross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgE.
Evaluate whether iterative exposure induces cross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgG.18 monthsCross-reactivity against rocuronium by quantitative analysis of anti-rocuronium IgG.
Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 10 weeks since the last exposure to ECT.10 weeksPersistence of antibodies detected at 10 weeks
Evaluate the persistence of antibodies (IgE and IgG4 against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium) detected at 6 months since the last exposure to ECT.6 monthsPersistence of antibodies detected at 6 months
Describe the antibody profile before exposure to NMBA, and the potential link with previous drug exposures in the previous year of antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.18 monthsAntibody profile before exposure to NMBA and the potential link with previous drug exposures in the previous year
Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeksIncidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeksIncidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeksIncidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.6 monthsIncidence of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeksIncidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeksIncidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeksIncidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium 6 months.6 monthsIncidence of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 2 weeks.2 weeksIncidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 4 weeks.4 weeksIncidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 10 weeks.10 weeksIncidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Incidence of specific IgG4 against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium at 6 months.6 monthsIncidence of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium suxamethonium and rocuronium (via ImmunoCAP and ELISA).
Levels of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 monthsLevels of specific IgE antibodies
Levels of specific IgG antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 monthsLevels of specific IgG antibodies
Levels of specific IgG4 antibodies against quaternary ammonium, suxamethonium and rocuronium before the ECT session.18 monthsLevels of specific IgG4 antibodies
Evaluate the influence of hormonal changes induced by ECT on immunization.18 monthsInfluence of hormonal changes on immunization
Risk factors: number of ECT sessions, exposure to pholcodine before or during the study, occupational exposure to quaternary ammoniums (hairdressers, cleaning agents, beauticians).18 monthsRisk factors
Exposures of the previous year to antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics.18 monthsPrevious exposure to antidepressant, mood stabilizers and anxiolytics
Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 0.Week 0Assay of hormones
Assay of ACTH, cortisol at week 10.Week 10Assay of hormones
Cytokine profile, particularly pro-tolerogenic, and development of Tregs lymphocytes.18 monthsProfile of cyrokine
Evaluate the development of specific IgE antibodies against quaternary ammoniums and suxamethonium after iterative exposure to ECT at 2 weeks.2 weeksDevelopment of specific IgE antibodies

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactAurélie Gouel
aurelie.gouel@aphp.fr01 40 25 70 67
Backup ContactLuc De Chaisemartin
luc.de-chaisemartin@aphp.fr01 40 25 68 97

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026