Skip to content

Effects of Body Position and Recruiting Maneuver on Lung Aeration Assessed Through Ultrasound in Patients Intubated for Acute Respiratory Failure Related to Novel Coronavirus 19 Disease

Effects of Body Position and Recruiting Maneuver on Lung Aeration Assessed Through Ultrasound in Patients Intubated for Acute Respiratory Failure Related to Novel Coronavirus 19 Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05209477
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-01-26
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Failure

Brief summary

Second analysis of data prospectively collected during an investigation assessing the clinical characteristics of patients admitted for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) related to novel coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19). In particular, the primary aim of the present analysis is to assess the effects of recruiting maneuver and prone positioning on lung aeration evaluated through lung ultrasound in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

Interventions

OTHERlung ultrasound assessment

In patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation with an arterial oxygen tension on inspired oxygen fraction ratio \< 200 mmHg requiring recruitment maneuver and prone positioning as a rescue therapy, lung aeration will be evaluated at: 1. baseline, in supine position under protective ventilation 2. after two minute of recruitment maneuver in pressure controlled ventilation 3. at 1 hour following prone positioning application

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients intubated for COVID-19 hARF -

Exclusion criteria

Any contraindication to recruitment and lung ultrasound, pregnancy \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
lung ultrasound scoreafter 20 minutes following study entry, in volume controll ventilation and supine positionlung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical in supine position. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration
lung ultrasound score recruitment2 minuteslung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical ventilation in supine position after two minutes of recruiting maneuver in pressure controlled ventilation. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration
lung ultrasound score prone positioning1 hourlung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical ventilation after 1 h from prone position application. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026