Skip to content

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05209412
Acronym
CAGE-FREEIII
Enrollment
370
Registered
2022-01-26
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2024-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, De Novo Stenosis, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Keywords

Drug-coated balloons, Fractional flow reserve, Percutaneous coronary intervention, De novo lesions, Drug-eluting stent

Brief summary

Coronary restenosis has been one of the main reasons affecting the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduces the restenosis rate; however, the incidence of restenosis is still about 10%. The late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB). DCB angioplasty has the following advantages compared with DES implantation: Firstly, the drug in DCB is uniformly distributed and released; whereas the drug release of DES via stent platform is uneven -85% of the vascular wall is not covered by the stent strut. Secondly, there is no alloy in the vessel after DCB angioplasty, while the coronary stent platform and polymer might cause temporal or persistent inflammatory response leading to intimal hyperplasia. Finally, there is no metal cage restraining vessel motion after DCB, the physiological function of coronary arteries would be maintained. Studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. The application of DCB in large vessels with de novo lesions is still to be investigated. The DEBUT study showed that in high bleeding risk patients aimed using only 1-month DAPT, DCB was superior to BMS in terms of MACE \[MACE (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or revascularization of ischemia-reperfusion target lesions)\] at 9-month follow-up. However, there is still a lack of evidence comparing the DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. The current study aims to investigate if in patients undergoing PCI for de novo stenoses in large vessels, DCB is non-inferior to DES.

Interventions

DEVICELepu Paclitaxel coated balloon

Paclitaxel is the pharmacologically active substance for anti-neointima. The active drug coating is located on the surface of the balloon, which contains 1.5 μg Paclitaxel per 1 mm2.

DEVICEResolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents

The device consists of a balloon-expandable intracoronary drug-eluting stent pre-mounted on the MicroTrac Rapid Exchange stent delivery system. Drug eluting stent is composed of metal stent, primer and drug coating. The Stent is manufactured from a cobalt alloy (MP35N). The strut thickness is 88.9 μm and the length elements is 0.9 mm. The drug coating consists of the zotarolimus and BioLinx polymer (C10/C19/PVP) system. A coating of polymers loaded with zotarolimus in a formulation applied to the entire surface of the stent at a dose of approximately 1.6 µg/mm2 which results in a maximum nominal drug content of 380 µg on the largest stent (4.0 x 38 mm).

DRUGAspirin

Aspirin is required for 3 months be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.

DRUGTicagrelor

Ticagrelor is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI.

DRUGClopidogrel

Clopidogrel is required for 12 months to be a part of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI when Ticagrelor is unfeasible or contradicted.

Sponsors

Xijing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18y ≤ age ≤ 80y; 2. De-novo coronary artery lesions with an indication for PCI; 3. Target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 70% (visual) or ≥ 50% (visual) with evidence of ischemia; 4. Target lesion reference vessel diameter (2.5mm-4.0 mm), Length of a single target lesion ≤ 35mm; Total treated lesion length ≤ 60 mm; 5. Vessels treated ≤ 2; only one DCB/DES is allowed for each target vessel; 6. ≤ 2 non-target lesions (non-TL) are allowed, and can not be in the same vessel as the target lesion (randomization should be implemented only after the successful treatment of all non-TL); 7. Patients who are able to complete the follow-up and compliant to the prescribed medication.

Exclusion criteria

1. Myocardial infarction (\< 7 days); 2. Heavy thrombotic burden in target vessel; 3. eGFR \< 30ml/min or hemodialysis patients; 4. Other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular procedures planned within 12 months after index PCI; 5. Patients with contraindications to antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants or bleeding tendency, history of active peptic ulcer, and stroke within 6 months; 6. Life expectancy of less than 1 years; 7. Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing; 8. Known allergic to medications such as Aspirin, Heparin, antiplatelet drugs, paclitaxel, or contrast; patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic immune diseases; 9. Chronic total occlusion lesion; 10. Unprotected left main disease; 11. Bifurcation lesion requiring 2 stents; 12. Ostial lesions, distance from left main ≤ 2mm; 13. Severe calcification or distortion; 14. Arterial, venous or prosthetic grafts; 15. In-stent stenosis requiring revascularization (defined as stenosis≥50% by visual or positive functional assessments in any vessel); 16. Myocardial bridging located at target lesions; 17. Currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint; 18. Participants deemed unsuitable to be enrolled by investigators for unable to comply with protocol or other reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Coronary fraction flow reserve (FFR) value12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In segment Late lumen loss (LLL)12 monthsKey Secondary Outcome

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binary restenosis (DS% ≥ 50%)12 months
Target lesion failure (TLF)1, 6, 12 monthsTarget lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically indicated-target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR)
Procedural success rate7 daysProcedural success rate included device success, lesion success and procedural success
Definite/Probable Stent thrombosis rates1, 6, 12 monthsStent thrombosis included acute, subacute, late and very late thrombosis
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE)1, 6, 12 monthsPatient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) defined as all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any clinically and indicated revascularisation)
Percentage of lesion segments diameter stenosis (DS%)12 months

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026