Skip to content

Comparison of Different Methods for Intra- and Postoperative Pain Therapy in Thoracic Surgery

Comparison of Different Methods for Intra- and Postoperative Pain Therapy in Thoracic Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05208619
Acronym
VERITAS
Enrollment
118
Registered
2022-01-26
Start date
2022-08-09
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thoracic Surgery

Keywords

Thoracic surgery, paravertebral block, epidural analgesia, Thoracic anaesthesia

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to determine which regional anaesthesiological technique (thoracic epidural analgesia or paravertebral block) is more suitable for thoracic surgery

Detailed description

Thoracic interventions (lung operations) are associated with considerable postoperative pain, whereby an open surgical procedure via a skin incision (thoracotomy) is more painful than a minimally invasive endoscopic intervention (thoracoscopy). In order to reduce pain, a regional anaesthetic is administered during the induction of anaesthesia, which reduces pain both intraoperatively and postoperatively. In thoracic surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia (PDA) and paravertebral block (PVB) are the main regional anaesthesiological measures used, although it is unclear which of the two procedures is superior in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Particularly intraoperatively, but also to some extent postoperatively, regional anaesthesia alone is usually not sufficient for pain management. Rather, additional systemic (i.e. intravenous) analgesics (especially opioids) are administered. Therefore, the amount of these additionally administered analgesics is a measure of the efficiency of the regional anaesthesia procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDURERegional anaesthesia

Patients receive either a thoracic epidural analgesia or paravertebral block as an regional anaesthetic adjunct to general anaesthesia for thoracic surgery

Sponsors

HELIOS Klinikum Bonn/Rhein-Sieg
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Bonn
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective thoracic surgery * American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3 status * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * adipositas (bmi \> 30) * cardiac arrhythmia * coagulation abnormalities * chronic pain * opiate abuses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opiate consumptionintraoperativeintraoperative opiate consumption

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative painup to day 2 after surgerycumulative dose of postoperatively given pain medication
anaesthetic depthintraoperativeBispectral Index
pain scorefrom admission to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) until discharge from PACU (up to 1 hour after admission)Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). A higher NRS score indicates a worse outcome.
Patient recoveryat day 1 after surgeryQuality of Recovery Score (QoR-15) ranging from 0-150, with a higher value representing a better outcome
Patient satisfactionat day 2 after surgeryBauer Satisfaction Questionnaire, consisting of 10 questions on anaesthesia-related discomfort (with 3 answer options: No/ Yes, moderate/ Yes, severe) and 5 questions on satisfaction with anaesthesia care (with 4 answer options: very satisfied/ satisfied / dissatisfied/ very dissatisfied)
intraoperative nociceptionintraoperativeNociception Level (NOL)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMartin Soehle, MD, PhD, MHBA
martin.soehle@ukbonn.de++49-228-287-14127

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026