Skip to content

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Assessment Strategy Through a Novel Gait Analysis Tool for Post-stroke Spasticity

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Assessment Strategy Through a Novel Gait Analysis Tool for Post-stroke Spasticity During COVID-19 Pandemic

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05206240
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-01-25
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2023-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spastic Gait, Spasticity, Muscle, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

stroke, spasticity, neurological rehabilitation, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, gait analysis system

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) and conventional physical therapy program on the gait pattern through a new gait analysis system which encompasses spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters and to correlate the findings with the clinical evaluation.

Detailed description

The aim of this observational study was to objectively evaluate the effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and conventional physical therapy program on the gait pattern, spatiotemporal variables (step length, step cycle time, stance foot flexion-extension, foot stance pronation-supination, and foot swing flexion-extension), and kinematic parameters (trunk flexion-extension, trunk lateral flexion, hip flexion-extension, knee flexion-extension, ankle flexion-extension) through a new gait analysis system and correlate the findings with clinical outcomes such as Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), passive range of motion (PROM), Clonus score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tinetti Assessment Tool, Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC). The gait pattern of post-stroke patients before and after rESWT delivery and conventional rehabilitation program will be assessed clinically and also through an instrumented treadmill (Walker View) in terms of spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters.

Interventions

OTHERRadial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and conventional physical therapy

The conventional physical therapy program will consist of verticalization strategies, range of motion exercises, muscle stretching and strengthening exercises, stance and balance training, core stability exercises, gait training, functional training, cryotherapy or local heat for 1h/day, 5 days/week for 2 weeks. Regarding the rESWT delivery, 2000 shots will be applied on the triceps surae myotendinous junction with a frequency of 10 Hz and an energy density of 60 mJ, 7 min/session, 1 session/week for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* suffered from a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke and they were in the subacute or chronic phase; * had no history of previous stroke; * had lower limb post- stroke spasticity and spasticity grade ≥1 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS); * pain intensity measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥1; * ability to stand and walk unassisted for at least 30 seconds; * adult patients (\>18 years old).

Exclusion criteria

* other neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopaedic, or cardiovascular conditions; -- severe cognitive impairment, severe aphasia or inability to understand or execute instructions; * changes in antispastic medication and dose or changes in the analgesic medication; * myopathy; * severe spasticity grade; * visual field disorders or hemineglect; * anticoagulants or any contraindication to receive radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), or any contraindication to receive physical therapy sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spasticity grade changeChange from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 14 daysModified Ashworth Scale (MAS); ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 5 (rigid limb in flexion or extension). The lower the score, the lower spasticity grade, thus a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle passive range of motion changeChange from baseline Passive Range of Motion at 14 daysPassive range of motion (PROM); flexion 0-30 degrees, extension 0-50 degrees, pronation 0-30 degrees, supination 0-60 degrees. Higher scores define augmented, better range of motion.
Pain intensity changeChange from baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 14 daysVisual Analogue Scale (VAS); the greater the value on the 0.1 meters line, the greater the pain intensity starting from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (the highest pain intensity ever experienced).
Step length changeChange from baseline step length at 14 daysStep length (meters); ranges from 0-0.5 meters, the higher the step length leads to better outcome.
Knee flexion-extension changeChange from baseline knee flexion-extension at 14 daysKnee flexion-extension; Maximum and minimum angle value in the sagittal plane of knee, from 0 degrees in full extension to 140-150 degrees in maximum flexion.

Countries

Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026