Skip to content

Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Major Depressive Disorders (MDD)

Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Major Depressive Disorders (MDD)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05205915
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-01-25
Start date
2022-02-02
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

This is an open label pilot feasibility telemedicine study. This pilot will involve a total of 37 at-home stimulation sessions (30-minutes each) of multichannel excitatory tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) administered over 8 weeks, with a follow-up period of 4 weeks following the final stimulation session.

Detailed description

This is an open label pilot feasibility telemedicine study. This pilot will involve a total of 37 at-home stimulation sessions (30-minutes each) of multichannel excitatory tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) administered over 8 weeks, with a follow-up period of 4 weeks following the final stimulation session. The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and safety of home-based tDCS for patients with MDD. The treatment course will consist of an acute phase of 28 tDCS sessions, conducted daily (7 days per week) over 4 weeks. Thereafter, participants will undergo a taper phase of an additional 9 sessions of tDCS applied in progressively decreasing frequency until day #60 of the study as follows: 1. Three tDCS sessions applied once every other day. 2. Three tDCS sessions applied once every third day. 3. Three tDCS sessions applied once every fourth day.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS intervention applied by Starstim device

Stimulation will be applied using the Starstim device, with current delivered via four Starstim Pi electrodes (circular electrodes with a contact of area of 3.14 cm2) embedded in the headpiece. All study subjects will use the same fixed montage (electrode locations and currents). The montage has been designed to optimize anodal stimulation in the desired target area while avoiding stimulation off target.

Sponsors

Neuroelectrics Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Major Depressive Disorder 2. Age \>=18 3. Currently experiencing a major depressive episode of at least four weeks' duration 4. MADRS score at least 20 at trial entry. 5. Taking at least one approved antidepressant medication (except bupropion). 6. Has a healthcare provider, and a companion who can help administer study treatments; and be able to connect frequently with study staff 7. Access to wireless internet (wifi) connection

Exclusion criteria

1. Any psychotic disorder. 2. Concurrent benzodiazepine medication. 3. High suicide risk 4. History of significant neurological disorder. 5. Skin lesions on the scalp at the proposed electrode sites. 6. Pregnancy. 7. Any antidepressant medications will be permitted (except bupropion) provided the medication dose has been unchanged for 4 weeks prior to trial entry. 8. Any cranial metal implants (excluding ≤1 mm thick epicranial titanium skull plates and dental fillings) or 9. Medical devices (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, medication infusion pump, cochlear implant, vagus nerve stimulator); 10. Previous surgeries opening the skull leaving skull defects capable of allowing the insertion of a cylinder with a radius greater or equal to 5 mm. 11. Substance use disorder (including alcohol) within the past year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of incomplete and missed sessions (%)From baseline to 4-week follow up across study subjectsFeasibility will be evaluated using home-based data as recorded in the Neuroelectrics portal. Range \[0,100\]. Higher is worse
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)From baseline to 4-week follow up across study subjectsSafety will be assessed by number and type of side effects
Median percentage change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Mood Rating Scale (MADRS) scoresFrom baseline to 4-week follow up across study subjectsThe primary efficacy measure for this study will be the median percent change from baseline to the end of the 4-week post-treatment follow-up period in the observer-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Mood Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979). Range \[0,100\]. Higher is worse

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rateFrom baseline to the 4-week follow-upResponse rate is the secondary efficacy endpoint and will be calculated for the study subjects, where clinical response is defined as ≥ 50% improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Mood Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Higher is better
Median percentage change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Mood Rating Scale (MADRS) scoresFrom baseline to the end of week 4 of treatment, and to the end of week 8 of treatment.
Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) scoreChange from baseline to 4-week follow-up in the participant-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR)Range \[0,27\]. Higher is worse
Change in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) scoreChange from baseline to 4-week follow-up in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)Range \[14,70\]. Higher is better

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026