Skip to content

Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Treatment of Participants With Bacterial Pneumonia (XNW4107-302, REITAB-2)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Imipenem/Cilastatin/XNW4107 in Comparison With Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in Adults With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (EudraCT no. 2022-000081-18) (EUCTR no. 2022-501952-27-00) (IND no. 146614)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05204563
Acronym
REITAB-2
Enrollment
450
Registered
2022-01-24
Start date
2022-07-31
Completion date
2024-09-29
Last updated
2025-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia

Brief summary

This study aims to compare treatment with Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 (IMI-XNW4107) with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) in participants with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP or VAPB, respectively). The primary hypothesis is that IMI-XNW4107 is non-inferior to IMI/REL in all-cause mortality.

Interventions

Imipenem/Cilastatin 500mg/500mg and XNW4107 250mg for Injection

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam 1.25 g for Injection

Sponsors

Evopoint Biosciences Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Has HABP or VABP as defined below and requires treatment with IV antibiotic therapy. Fulfills clinical criteria, with onset of criteria occurring after more than 48 hours of hospitalization or within 7 days after discharge from a hospital (for HABP); or at least 48 hours after mechanical ventilation (for VABP) 2. Fulfills clinical criteria with symptoms or signs of cough, expectorated sputum production, dyspnea, worsening oxygenation, increase in respiratory secretions, fever/ hypothermia.. 3. Fulfills laboratory test criteria with Leukocytosis/ Leukocytosis/ increase in immature neutrophils 4. Fulfill radiograph criteria with presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia in X-ray/ Chest CT. 5. Female subjects of childbearing potential, who are willing to birth control during the study and for at least 30 days following the last dose of study medication. Male subjects with female sexual partners of childbearing potential are eligible for inclusion if they agree to use birth control for 90 days following the last dose of study medication. Male subjects must agree not to donate sperm

Exclusion criteria

1. Gram stain from a respiratory sample shows only Gram-positive cocci. 2. Have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia including Coronavirus disease, or chemical pneumonia. 3. Have HABP/VABP caused by an obstructive process, including lung cancer or other known obstruction. 4. Have received effective antibacterial drug therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP for more than 24 hours during the previous 72 hours . 5. Have central nervous system infection. 6. Documented presence of immunodeficiency or an immunocompromised condition 7. Documented or severe hypersensitivity or previous severe adverse drug reaction, especially to any beta-lactam antibiotics, or any of the excipients used in the study drug formulations. 8. History of a seizure disorder requiring ongoing treatment with anti-convulsive therapy or prior treatment with anti-convulsive therapy within the last 3 years. 9. eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73㎡. 10. Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. 11. Anticipated to be treated with any of Valproic acid or divalproex sodium, concomitant systemic Gram-negative antibacterial agents, or concomitant systemic antifungal or antiviral therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP. 12. Life expectancy is \<3 days. 13. Patients in refractory septic shock 14. Patients with 1 or more of laboratory abnormalities in baseline specimens. 15. History of active liver disease or cirrhosis. 16. APACHE II score of \>30. 17. A female who is pregnant or breastfeeding or has a positive pregnancy test at Screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Day 14 All-cause Mortality RateDay 14The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 14, Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 14, Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 14, Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 14, Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) PopulationDay 14, Day 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationDay 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationDay 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationDay 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationDay 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Day 28 All-cause Mortality RateDay 28The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Day 1 to Day 28A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event.
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsPredose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6.
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Countries

France, Israel, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a clinical diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) who met all eligibility criteria, and were assessed by the investigator as requiring 7 up to 14 days of intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment in the hospital were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via intravenous (IV) infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
300
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam
Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days.
150
Total450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath184
Overall StudyEnrolled, Not Treated10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up63
Overall StudyOther than Specified21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject123

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalImipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamImipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107
Age, Customized
85 years and over
14 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
254 Participants86 Participants168 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
From 65-84 years
182 Participants61 Participants121 Participants
Age, Customized
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
In utero
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Newborns (0-27 days)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
450 Participants150 Participants300 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
445 Participants149 Participants296 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
136 Participants50 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
314 Participants100 Participants214 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
23 / 2995 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
260 / 299136 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 29910 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Measured in the Modified Intent-To-Treat (MITT) population, which included all participants from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate3.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 All-cause Mortality Rate2.7 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-3.5, 4]
Secondary

Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations

Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6.

Time frame: Predose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6

Population: Measured in the pharmacokinetic (PK) population, which included all participants from the safety population during the study with at least 1 reportable concentration of XNW4107, imipenem, or cilastatin. As pre-specified, data for PK was collected and reported only for the study drug treatment group (Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsXNW4107 Day (D)4/D5/D6 Pre-dose3840 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 3330
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsXNW4107 D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose16000 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 6030
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsXNW4107 D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose7320 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 3890
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsImipenem D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose1770 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 2050
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsImipenem D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose22900 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 9310
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsImipenem D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose5970 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 2980
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsCilastatin D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose1910 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 3350
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsCilastatin D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose24200 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 10100
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin ConcentrationsCilastatin D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose5610 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)Standard Deviation 4720
Secondary

Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 28

Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) PopulationDay 141.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) PopulationDay 281.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) PopulationDay 288.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) PopulationDay 148.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 1495% CI: [-25.3, 9.7]
Comparison: Day 2895% CI: [-25.3, 9.7]
Secondary

Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 28

Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 141.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 285.6 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 142.5 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 283.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 1495% CI: [-4.9, 3.3]
Comparison: Day 2895% CI: [-2.7, 7.2]
Secondary

Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 28

Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 143.3 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 287.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 142.6 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 283.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 1495% CI: [-5.4, 6.3]
Comparison: Day 2895% CI: [-3.9, 9.8]
Secondary

Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 28

Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. 'n' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 142.1 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 283.1 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 140 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 282.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 1495% CI: [-4.7, 8.9]
Comparison: Day 2895% CI: [-6.5, 9.1]
Secondary

Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.

Time frame: Day 14, Day 28

Population: Measured in the microbiologic (micro)-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 143.5 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 286.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 140 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 281.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 1495% CI: [-3, 9.4]
Comparison: Day 2895% CI: [-3.4, 11.3]
Secondary

Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate

The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate7.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamDay 28 All-cause Mortality Rate3.3 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-0.4, 8.7]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 28

Population: Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE286 Participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE34 Participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE147 Participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE10 Participants
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationDay 465.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)85.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationTOC (Day 21)75.5 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationLFU (Day 28)70.8 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationLFU (Day 28)68.3 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationDay 463.3 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationTOC (Day 21)75.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)83.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-7.7, 12.6]
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-8.3, 12.8]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-6.7, 10.1]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-9.2, 10]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationDay 460.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)79.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)64.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)50.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)39.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationDay 456.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)43.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)60.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-20.3, 32.1]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-5.4, 42.1]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-1.5, 47.5]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-11.6, 39.7]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 456.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTEOT (up to Day 14)81.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTTOC (Day 21)65.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTLFU (Day 28)60.8 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTLFU (Day 28)51.3 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTDay 456.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTTOC (Day 21)57.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITTEOT (up to Day 14)73.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-12.7, 14.4]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-3.7, 20.3]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-4.8, 21.9]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-3, 24.2]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationDay 457.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)88.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)76.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)71.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)60.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationDay 460.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)68.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)80.4 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-21.4, 12.2]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-5.8, 21.2]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-9.4, 22]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-5.9, 27.1]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 454.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)84.1 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)66.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)62.8 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)54.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationDay 456.1 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)61.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)71.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-18.1, 13.6]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-1.6, 26.3]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-10.5, 20.4]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-6.9, 24.7]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population

Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).

Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationDay 459.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)74.6 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)62.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)58.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)56.7 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationDay 456.0 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)63.3 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)71.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 495% CI: [-6, 13.2]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-5.3, 12.3]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-9.4, 9.3]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-6.9, 12.2]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)61.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)30.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)19.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)63.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)31.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)26.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)53.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)30.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)15.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)31.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)18.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)18.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)71.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)71.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationKlebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)71.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-4.2, 64.8]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-19.1, 43.2]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-29, 29.9]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-57.9, 41.1]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-89.1, 9.4]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-93.8, 3.5]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-59.8, 100]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-82, 76.9]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-95.3, 59.4]
Comparison: Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)85.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (Up to Day 14)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)60.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)40.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)40.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)75.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationHaemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationMorganella morganii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationMorganella morganii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationMorganella morganii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationRalstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)58.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)53.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)75.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)57.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)46.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)59.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)34.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)28.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)67.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSphingomonas species LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)58.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)51.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationStenotrophomonas maltophilia EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)56.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)47.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)43.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationStenotrophomonas maltophilia TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)28.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)28.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationStenotrophomonas maltophilia LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationBurkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (Up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationProteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSphingomonas species EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSphingomonas species TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [0.4, 35.5]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-11.3, 48.3]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-27, 45.7]
Comparison: Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-96.1, 29.4]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-96.1, 29.4]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-100, 29.6]
Comparison: Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [0, 100]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-19.4, 20]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-22.1, 40.7]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-28.2, 39.8]
Comparison: Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-90.3, 90.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-75, 100]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 9.6]
Comparison: Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 54.9]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-94.3, 100]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Comparison: Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-17.1, 22.7]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-28.4, 34.3]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-33.9, 33]
Comparison: Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-90.3, 90.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-75, 100]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 68.5]
Comparison: Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 36.5]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 94.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)80.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)70.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)31.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)68.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)80.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)64.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)80.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)40.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)93.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationSerratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)60.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)51.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)30.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)30.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)88.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)88.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)77.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationSerratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME PopulationSerratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [2.4, 39.6]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-25.7, 62]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-51.6, 33.9]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-100, 61]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-100, 69.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-12.7, 32.1]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-31.4, 53.2]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-51.6, 33.9]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 100]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 69.3]
Comparison: Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 86.7]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-94.3, 100]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-10.5, 35.6]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-39.9, 43.5]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-45.1, 49.6]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 100]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 69.3]
Comparison: Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 86.7]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 94.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)61.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)60.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)28.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)40.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)68.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)40.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)66.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)57.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)36.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)88.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens LFU (Day 28)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)64.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)54.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationK.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)45.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)45.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)27.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationPseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)27.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)72.7 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationA.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)63.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEnterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)33.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationEscherichia coli LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationCitrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)50.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationAcinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationKlebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)100.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14)0.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT PopulationSerratia marcescens TOC (Day 21)100.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [4.3, 42.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-13.6, 29.2]
Comparison: Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-9.6, 33.5]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-18.6, 63.7]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-30.2, 47.6]
Comparison: Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-37.5, 38.9]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-46.3, 46.3]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-46.3, 46.3]
Comparison: A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-38.7, 56.9]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-100, 37.9]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 17.9]
Comparison: Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 17.9]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-100, 53.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 100]
Comparison: Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 100]
Comparison: Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 86.7]
Comparison: Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 86.7]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-94.3, 100]
Comparison: Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 94.3]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Comparison: Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-100, 0]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)56.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)28.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)17.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)34.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)26.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)26.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-6.4, 44.8]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-24.3, 22]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-32.9, 12.5]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)75.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)52.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)46.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)65.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)47.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)42.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-2.3, 23.5]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-7.2, 20]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-8.2, 18.9]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)85.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)65.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)58.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)78.4 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)56.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)49.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-7.9, 20.4]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-9.5, 24.5]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-8.6, 26]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population

Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)81.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)57.5 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)52.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)70.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)50.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)43.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-3.5, 25.3]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-9.7, 22.4]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-7.3, 24.7]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population

Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)47.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)22.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)17.0 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)34.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)26.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)26.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-14.5, 36.9]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-28.4, 17.6]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-32.9, 12.5]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population

Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)68.6 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)45.8 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)42.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)61.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)44.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)39.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-5.8, 20.8]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-11.6, 15.5]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-9.2, 17.4]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population

Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)78.1 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)57.3 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)54.2 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)72.5 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationTOC (Day 21)52.9 Percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME PopulationLFU (Day 28)45.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-8.4, 25.6]
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-10.6, 20.2]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-14, 20.4]
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population

Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.

Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)

Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)75.2 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)50.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)47.8 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationEOT (up to Day 14)64.9 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationTOC (Day 21)47.4 percentage of participants
Imipenem/Cilastatin/RelebactamThe Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT PopulationLFU (Day 28)40.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: EOT (up to Day 14)95% CI: [-4.9, 25.3]
Comparison: TOC (Day 21)95% CI: [-13, 19]
Comparison: LFU (Day 28)95% CI: [-7.6, 23.5]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026