Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to compare treatment with Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 (IMI-XNW4107) with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) in participants with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP or VAPB, respectively). The primary hypothesis is that IMI-XNW4107 is non-inferior to IMI/REL in all-cause mortality.
Interventions
Imipenem/Cilastatin 500mg/500mg and XNW4107 250mg for Injection
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam 1.25 g for Injection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Has HABP or VABP as defined below and requires treatment with IV antibiotic therapy. Fulfills clinical criteria, with onset of criteria occurring after more than 48 hours of hospitalization or within 7 days after discharge from a hospital (for HABP); or at least 48 hours after mechanical ventilation (for VABP) 2. Fulfills clinical criteria with symptoms or signs of cough, expectorated sputum production, dyspnea, worsening oxygenation, increase in respiratory secretions, fever/ hypothermia.. 3. Fulfills laboratory test criteria with Leukocytosis/ Leukocytosis/ increase in immature neutrophils 4. Fulfill radiograph criteria with presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia in X-ray/ Chest CT. 5. Female subjects of childbearing potential, who are willing to birth control during the study and for at least 30 days following the last dose of study medication. Male subjects with female sexual partners of childbearing potential are eligible for inclusion if they agree to use birth control for 90 days following the last dose of study medication. Male subjects must agree not to donate sperm
Exclusion criteria
1. Gram stain from a respiratory sample shows only Gram-positive cocci. 2. Have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia including Coronavirus disease, or chemical pneumonia. 3. Have HABP/VABP caused by an obstructive process, including lung cancer or other known obstruction. 4. Have received effective antibacterial drug therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP for more than 24 hours during the previous 72 hours . 5. Have central nervous system infection. 6. Documented presence of immunodeficiency or an immunocompromised condition 7. Documented or severe hypersensitivity or previous severe adverse drug reaction, especially to any beta-lactam antibiotics, or any of the excipients used in the study drug formulations. 8. History of a seizure disorder requiring ongoing treatment with anti-convulsive therapy or prior treatment with anti-convulsive therapy within the last 3 years. 9. eGFR \<15 mL/min/1.73㎡. 10. Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. 11. Anticipated to be treated with any of Valproic acid or divalproex sodium, concomitant systemic Gram-negative antibacterial agents, or concomitant systemic antifungal or antiviral therapy for the index infection of HABP/VABP. 12. Life expectancy is \<3 days. 13. Patients in refractory septic shock 14. Patients with 1 or more of laboratory abnormalities in baseline specimens. 15. History of active liver disease or cirrhosis. 16. APACHE II score of \>30. 17. A female who is pregnant or breastfeeding or has a positive pregnancy test at Screening.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate | Day 14 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 14, Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28. |
| Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 14, Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28. |
| Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 14, Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28. |
| Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population | Day 14, Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28. |
| Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population | Day 14, Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28) | Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia). |
| Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate | Day 28 | The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Day 1 to Day 28 | A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event. |
| Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Predose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6 | Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6. |
| The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28) | Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success. |
Countries
France, Israel, Spain, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants with a clinical diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) who met all eligibility criteria, and were assessed by the investigator as requiring 7 up to 14 days of intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment in the hospital were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 Participants received imipenem/cilastatin via intravenous (IV) infusion and XNW4107 via injection during the treatment period of up to 14 days. | 300 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Participants received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam via IV infusion during the treatment period of up to 14 days. | 150 |
| Total | 450 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 18 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Enrolled, Not Treated | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Other than Specified | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 12 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 85 years and over | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Age, Customized Adolescents (12-17 years) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized Adults (18-64 years) | 254 Participants | 86 Participants | 168 Participants |
| Age, Customized Children (2-11 years) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized From 65-84 years | 182 Participants | 61 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Age, Customized Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized In utero | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized Newborns (0-27 days) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Customized Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks) | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 450 Participants | 150 Participants | 300 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 445 Participants | 149 Participants | 296 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 136 Participants | 50 Participants | 86 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 314 Participants | 100 Participants | 214 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 23 / 299 | 5 / 150 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 260 / 299 | 136 / 150 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 34 / 299 | 10 / 150 |
Outcome results
Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.
Time frame: Day 14
Population: Measured in the Modified Intent-To-Treat (MITT) population, which included all participants from the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate | 3.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate | 2.7 percentage of participants |
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6.
Time frame: Predose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6
Population: Measured in the pharmacokinetic (PK) population, which included all participants from the safety population during the study with at least 1 reportable concentration of XNW4107, imipenem, or cilastatin. As pre-specified, data for PK was collected and reported only for the study drug treatment group (Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | XNW4107 Day (D)4/D5/D6 Pre-dose | 3840 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 3330 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | XNW4107 D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose | 16000 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 6030 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | XNW4107 D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose | 7320 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 3890 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Imipenem D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose | 1770 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 2050 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Imipenem D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose | 22900 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 9310 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Imipenem D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose | 5970 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 2980 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 Pre-dose | 1910 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 3350 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 5-25min post dose | 24200 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 10100 |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations | Cilastatin D4/D5/D6 2-3hour post dose | 5610 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) | Standard Deviation 4720 |
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population | Day 14 | 1.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population | Day 28 | 1.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population | Day 28 | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population | Day 14 | 8.7 percentage of participants |
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 14 | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 28 | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 14 | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 28 | 3.3 percentage of participants |
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 14 | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 28 | 7.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 14 | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 28 | 3.8 percentage of participants |
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. 'n' = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population | Day 14 | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population | Day 28 | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population | Day 14 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population | Day 28 | 2.0 percentage of participants |
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Population: Measured in the microbiologic (micro)-MITT population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 14 | 3.5 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 28 | 6.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 14 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 28 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28.
Time frame: Day 28
Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate | 7.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate | 3.3 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 28
Population: Measured in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the study. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment received during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAE | 286 Participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 34 Participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAE | 147 Participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAE | 10 Participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the CE population, which included all participants from the MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of clinical outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of clinical outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | Day 4 | 65.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | TOC (Day 21) | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | LFU (Day 28) | 70.8 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | LFU (Day 28) | 68.3 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | Day 4 | 63.3 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | TOC (Day 21) | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | Day 4 | 60.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 79.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 64.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 50.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 39.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | Day 4 | 56.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 43.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 60.9 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 4 | 56.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | EOT (up to Day 14) | 81.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | TOC (Day 21) | 65.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | LFU (Day 28) | 60.8 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | LFU (Day 28) | 51.3 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | Day 4 | 56.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | TOC (Day 21) | 57.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT | EOT (up to Day 14) | 73.1 percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | Day 4 | 57.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 88.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 76.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 71.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 60.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | Day 4 | 60.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 68.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 80.4 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 4 | 54.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 84.1 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 66.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 62.8 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 54.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | Day 4 | 56.1 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 61.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 71.9 percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the MITT, which included all participants from the ITT who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | Day 4 | 59.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 74.6 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 62.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 58.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 56.7 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | Day 4 | 56.0 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 63.3 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 71.3 percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 61.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 30.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 19.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 63.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 31.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 26.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 53.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 30.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 31.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 18.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 18.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 71.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 71.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Klebsiella pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 71.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 85.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (Up to Day 14) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 60.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 75.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Haemophilus influenzae LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Morganella morganii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Morganella morganii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Morganella morganii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas otitidis LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Ralstonia pickettii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 58.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 53.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 75.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 57.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 46.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 59.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 34.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 28.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 67.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Sphingomonas species LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 58.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 51.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 56.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 47.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 43.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex TOC (Day 21) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Burkholderia cepacia complex LFU (Day 28) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (Up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Proteus mirabilis LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Sphingomonas species EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Sphingomonas species TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 70.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 31.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 68.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 64.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 40.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 93.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 60.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 51.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 30.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 30.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 88.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 88.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 77.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population | Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator. Overall number of participants analysed=participants evaluable for the endpoint, n=number evaluable at the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 61.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 60.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 28.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 68.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 57.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter freundii complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 36.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 88.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens LFU (Day 28) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 64.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex TOC (Day 21) | 54.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | K.pneumoniae complex LFU (Day 28) | 45.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa EOT (up to Day 14) | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa TOC (Day 21) | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Pseudomonas aeruginosa LFU (Day 28) | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex TOC (Day 21) | 72.7 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | A.calco/baumannii complex LFU (Day 28) | 63.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Enterobacter cloacae complex LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes TOC (Day 21) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella aerogenes LFU (Day 28) | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Escherichia coli LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri TOC (Day 21) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Citrobacter koseri LFU (Day 28) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Acinetobacter junii LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca EOT (up to Day 14) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Klebsiella oxytoca LFU (Day 28) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens EOT (up to Day 14) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population | Serratia marcescens TOC (Day 21) | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 56.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 28.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 17.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 34.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 75.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 46.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 65.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 47.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 42.3 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 85.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 65.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 58.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 78.4 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 56.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 49.0 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 57.5 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 52.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 70.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 50.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 43.9 percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the CR-MITT Population, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which is resistant to any carbapenem.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 47.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 17.0 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 34.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 26.1 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the Extended micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a baseline Gram-negative pathogen identified which was susceptible to either the investigational medicinal product or comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 68.6 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 45.8 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 42.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 61.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 44.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 39.7 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the ME population, which included all participants from the micro-MITT who received at least 72 hours of IV study treatment, had an appropriate diagnosis of HABP/VABP, had no important protocol deviations that affected the assessment of microbiological outcome, and had no missing nor indeterminate assessment of microbiological outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 78.1 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 57.3 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 54.2 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 72.5 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | TOC (Day 21) | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population | LFU (Day 28) | 45.1 Percentage of participants |
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Population: Measured in the micro-MITT, which included all participants from the MITT who had a Gram-negative pathogen identified at baseline and the pathogen was susceptible to the investigational medicinal product and comparator.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 50.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin and XNW4107 | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 47.8 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | EOT (up to Day 14) | 64.9 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | TOC (Day 21) | 47.4 percentage of participants |
| Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam | The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population | LFU (Day 28) | 40.4 percentage of participants |