Chronic Liver Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic liver disease, TIPS, Quality of life
Brief summary
Patient with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease often present portal hypertension which may lead to bleading or ascites. One of the treatment of portal hypertension in these patients is the placement of a Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS). The indications for placing TIPS take on various clinical presentations, the most classic being digestive haemorrhage by rupture of oesophageal and/or gastric varices and refractory ascites. TIPS placement involves changes in haemodynamics and liver function that may alter the patients' condition and quality of life. Very few articles have evaluated the quality of life of these patients and when quality of life is evaluated it is mostly with not adapted or not validated scales. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of life of patients who have undergone TIPS using a validated and standardised quality of life questionnaire (the SF-36 questionnaire).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALQuestionnaire
Quality of Life assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire
Sponsors
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years * Patients referred to the TIPS service between January 2012 and October 2020 at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg, with a follow-up period of at least 1 month * Subjects who have not expressed any opposition to the use of their medical data for research purposes * For subjects invited to fill in the questionnaires: subject having expressed his/her agreement with the use of his/her medical data in the framework of the current study
Exclusion criteria
* Diseased patient * Liver transplant patient following TIPS * Pregnancy * Patient in a vulnerable situation * Patient under court protection, guardianship or trusteeship * Difficulties in understanding the questionnaire * Impossible to give the subject informed information (subject in an emergency situation, difficulties in understanding the subject, etc.) * Subject under legal protection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mental component of quality of Life of the | 45 minutes | Assessment of the mental component of quality of life by a generic questionnaire (SF-36), |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed