Skip to content

Short-term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain

Short-term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05203783
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-01-24
Start date
2021-08-08
Completion date
2021-12-25
Last updated
2022-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of Kinesio tape (KT) combined with supervised exercise programs compared to exercise alone on pain, lumbar range of motion, and self-reported disability of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP). Methods: This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial carried out on 60 individuals with mechanical LBP. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group (n=30) that received McKenzie exercises for 7 days or experimental group (n=30) that received KT application in addition to McKenzie exercises for 7 days. Pain measured by visual analogue scale, lumbar range of motion, and the disability measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used as outcome measures. Pre and Post measurements were taken at baseline and after 7 days.

Interventions

McKenzie exercises: The McKenzie set consists of 5 exercises. 1. Prone-lying 2. Prone-extension 3. Prone press ups 4. Progressive extension with pillows 5. Standing extension

Kinesio Tape (KT) application: Participants in the experimental group received additional taping using KT by an experience therapist with prior training in KT application. The tape was applied using the method proposed for the sacrospinalis muscle (Kase, 1996). Y-shaped tape was applied as shown in Figure 1. While the participant was in standing position, the origin of the Y-shaped tape was attached over the centre of the sacrum without stretching the tape and afterward subjects gradually bent forward. A 5-degree angle was maintained within the valley of the Y tape. The tape was changed on the fourth day

Sponsors

Marmara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals diagnosed with mechanical LBP by a physician

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with any structural or pathological changes (spondylitis, spondylolisthesis, cauda equina syndrome, lumbar canal stenosis) in lumbar spine on X-ray or MRI * Individuals with or without neurological signs in the lower extremity suggestive upper motor or lower motor neuron involvement, * Individuals with a history of trauma or any surgery in the region of back, * Individuals with recent aggravation of symptoms, * Individuals on a waiting list for spinal surgery or had a spinal surgery in the past 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scale (VAS)The pain was measured at baselinePain was measured using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants placed a mark on the line that best represented their perception of pain at that instant. The VAS score was measured in cm from the left hand end of the line to the mark.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)The ODI was measured at study entry 2 minutes after the pain assesment.The ODI was used to assess the disability. The ODI is a valid and reliable tool that measures functional disability. The scale consists of 10 sections, each section the total possible score is ranging from 0 to 5. After that, the entire score is multiplied by two to get a percentage.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026