Skip to content

Prevalence and Clinicopathologic Features of Different HER2 Level in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients

HER2 Retrospective Epidemiology Study Prevalence and Clinicopathologic Features of Different HER2 Level in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients (HER2 PATH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05203458
Acronym
HER2 PATH
Enrollment
3136
Registered
2022-01-24
Start date
2022-02-24
Completion date
2023-07-05
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, HER2

Keywords

breast cancer,HER2

Brief summary

This retrospective study aims to estimate the prevalence of different HER2 expression levels (HER2+, HER2-low, HER2 Ø) in approximately 200 breast cancer patients at FUSCC through the year of 2015 and 3000 breast cancer patients from about 10 medical centres in China between July 2021 and July 2022

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, retrospective study to estimate the prevalence of different HER2 expression levels (HER2+, HER2-low, HER2 Ø) in approximately 200 breast cancer patients at FUSCC through the year of 2015 and 3000 breast cancer patients from about 10 medical centres in China between July 2021 and July 2022. This study will be divided into two parts: The first part will include 200 subjects who were pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer at FUSCC between Jan 2015 and Dec 2015 (PART 1).This part will collect rescored HER2 expression level results based on the archived HER2 IHC slides and re-staining and re-scoring HER-2 IHC while relative demographic, treatment, and clinicopathologic data will be extracted from the FUSCC Breast Cancer Single Disease Database. The second part will include 3000 patients from all sites in China who were pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer between July 2021 and July 2022 (PART 2). This part will collect re-assessed HER2 expression level results based on the archived HER2 IHC slides. The general information of patients, diagnosis, clinicopathological information were collected from medical records, Hospital Information System (HIS) and Laboratory Information Management System (LIS). In PART 2, among 3000 patients, 270 from all participating sites except FUSCC should have enough tumor tissue for re-staining and re-scoring HER-2 IHC at FUSCC to analyse the concordance between leading site and other centers. In PART 2, among 3000 patients, 800 HER-2 IHC samples will be selected for the validation through AI-assisted HER2 assessment system

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients fulfilling all of the following criteria will be eligible for this study: * Male and female patients must have a histological confirmed diagnosis of BC * The patients must be ≥18 years old at the diagnosis. * In PART 1, all patients should be diagnosed at FUSCC between Jan 2015 and Dec 2015. * In PART 2, all patients should be diagnosed at all participating sites between July 2021 and July 2022. * Provision of at least 1 archived HER2 IHC slides associated with confirmed diagnosis of BC, which are in good condition for rescoring. * FISH result is available for HER2 IHC2+ in primary scoring.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be disqualified from entering the study: * Absence of all demographic, histopathologic, clinicopathologic information . * Have a history of other malignancies, other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Prevalence of different HER2 expression levelsWithin one yearTo estimate the prevalence of different HER2 expression levels (HER2+, HER2-low(defined as IHC 1+,2+/ISH-), HER2 Ø) in Chinese breast cancer patients in PART 2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ER status of histopathologicalWithin one yearER status by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
HER2 IHC score of histopathologicalWithin one yearHER2 IHC score by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
FISH status of histopathologicalWithin one yearFISH status by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
The concordance between historical scoring and reassess scoring in each IHC score category (IHC score Ø, 1+, 2+and 3+)Within one yearTo estimate the concordance between historical scoring and reassess scoring in each IHC score category (IHC score Ø, 1+, 2+and 3+) in PART 2
The concordance of HER2 expression between manual and AI assisted HER2 interpretationWithin one yearTo estimate the concordance of HER2 expression between manual and AI assisted HER2 interpretation among 800 patients in PART 2
The concordance of HER2 expression between leading site (FUSCC) and other centersWithin one yearTo estimate the concordance of HER2 expression between leading site (FUSCC) and other centers among 270 patients in PART 2
Tumor size of histopathologicalWithin one yearTumor size of Histopathological characteristic by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
Positive lymph node number of the histopathologicalWithin one yearPositive lymph node number of histopathological characteristic by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
TNM stage by different HER2 expression levelsWithin one yearTNM stage by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
Pathological type of histopathologicalWithin one yearPathological type by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
Histological grade of histopathologicalWithin one yearHistological grade by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
Multi-focal of histopathologicalWithin one yearMulti-focal by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
ER percentage by different HER2 expression levels.Within one yearER percentage by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
PR status of histopathologicalWithin one yearPR status by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
PR percentage by different HER2 expression levels.Within one yearPR(Progesterone Receptor) percentage by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) in PART 1 and PART 2
Ki-67 percentage by different HER2 expression levels.Within one yearHistopathological and clinicopathological characteristics by different HER2 expression level (Ø /Low/High) including: Ki-67 percentage,in PART 1 and PART 2

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
BMI of patients' demographic at baselineAt baselineBMI of patients' demographic at baseline by different HER2 expression level in PART 1
Menopause or not of patients' demographic at baselineAt baselineMenopause or not of patients' demographic at baseline by different HER2 expression level in PART 1
The baseline treatment patterns across patients with different HER2 expression levelsAt baselinePatients' treatment patterns at baseline, by different HER2 expression level in PART 1
The prevalence of HER2 IHC0 and HER2 IHC >0<1+Within one yearTo estimate the prevalence of HER2 IHC0 and HER2 IHC \>0\<1+ in PART 2
Age at diagnosis of patients' demographic at baselineAt baselineAge at diagnosis of patients' demographic at baseline by different HER2 expression level in PART 1

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026