Skip to content

PIMPmyHospital: a Mobile App to Improve Emergency Care Efficiency and Communication

Assessing the Impact of a Mobile Device App to Improve Emergency Care Efficiency and Remote Collaborative and Synchronous Communication in a Pediatric Emergency Department: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05203146
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-01-24
Start date
2021-09-06
Completion date
2021-09-06
Last updated
2024-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Communication

Keywords

Information technologies, Mobile Applications, Laboratory Result Delivery, Information Storage and Retrieval, Hospital Communication Systems, Communication, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department

Brief summary

This pilot study is a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial in a tertiary pediatric emergency department with two parallel groups of voluntary post-graduate year 1 to 5 pediatric residents and registered pediatric emergency nurses. The impact of an mHealth support tool will be compared to conventional methods on the retrieval of laboratory data from the patient's electronic record, and on team collaboration in a semi-simulated emergency department environment. Ten participants are randomized (1:1). The primary endpoint is the time from the availability of new laboratory results for a given patient to their consideration by participants, measured in minutes using a stopwatch.

Detailed description

Emergency care is very complex in that it requires patient-centered care in a coordinated manner among multiple providers in a highly distractible, unpredictable, multi-tasking, and stressful environment. Due to the inherent characteristics of specimen processing and laboratory instruments, the turnaround time from laboratory test ordering to availability of results can be long. As a result, caregivers must continue their multiple tasks while waiting for these results and, in the absence of reminder alerts, they must remember to check their availability. This can lead to oversights or delays in their consideration. Lack of follow-up of abnormal laboratory results can lead to missed information that could impact patient care and safety. Moreover, sharing information efficiently between providers in this environment is difficult. Caregivers are often far away from each other, busy with their tasks, without the ability to quickly communicate face-to-face with their colleagues to exchange important information regarding their patients. Connecting emergency service providers to each other through a digital communication channel could improve the efficiency of synchronous information sharing and emergency care, as well as instant retrieval of laboratory results at the point of care. To this end, the investigators have developed a mobile application (app) dedicated to emergency department caregivers, PIMPmyHospital (Patients In My Pocket in my Hospital \[PubMed Identifier number 34734879\]). This app aims to provide relevant information in real time about the patients emergency departments' caregivers are caring for, including laboratory results, as well as a chat and secure messaging platform to virtually connect physicians and nurses caring for the same patients. This clinical trial is a pilot, prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial in a tertiary pediatric emergency department (\>33,000 consultations/year) with two parallel groups of voluntary PGY 1 to 5 pediatric residents and registered pediatric emergency nurses. It aims to assess the impact of the app in a real pediatric emergency department environment through standardized, semi-simulated scenarios. Ten participants (5 residents and 5 nurses) are randomized 1:1. During their actual clinical tasks, each participant is asked to take note of laboratory results about a fictional patient that randomly occur once during the course of the scripted scenario, using either the app (study arm A) or conventional methods (study arm B), and secondly, to then respond to requests from a remote colleague to go to a specific location in the emergency room to assist with a technical procedure (the request being relayed either by the app or one of the study investigators depending on the study arm allocation). The primary endpoint is the time from the availability of new laboratory results to their consideration by participants, measured in minutes using a stopwatch. The secondary endpoint is the time from when the participant is informed that a colleague requires his or her assistance to perform a technical procedure to when the participant reaches that colleague, measured in minutes using a stopwatch. Data collection is carried out by two study investigators. Deidentified data are safely stored in duplicate on papers and secured hard-disk drives in a locked room at the Geneva Children's Hospital, Switzerland. This study offers the major advantage to observe a unique period per participant during their regular shift. Therefore, neither follow-up nor retention plans is necessary. The REDCap database (REDCap, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA) will be used for data collection. Study data will be de-identified and a master linking log (code key) with identifiers (ie, participant identification list on paper format) will be kept and stored separately from the data by the study investigators in a secured cabinet in a locked room at Geneva Children's Hospital, Switzerland, under the responsibility of the principal investigator. This clinical trial will assess the impact of a collaborative mHealth tool to increase timely medical information retrieval at the point of care and team communication in an emergency department. The results of this pilot study will be used to set up a larger randomized controlled trial. As research in this area is scarce, the results generated from this study could be of importance to improve in-hospital pediatric emergency care practice and communication in an era of communication technologies.

Interventions

DEVICEPIMPmyHospital (mobile health tool)

Each participant will first be asked to retrieve a factious patient's laboratory results on the app when randomly made available, and then reach a colleague (role played by a study investigator) when asked to do so by a text message on the app.

Each participant will first be asked to retrieve a factious patient's laboratory results from the emergency department's computerized patient data system when randomly made available, and then contact a colleague (role played by a study investigator) when asked to do so (request made by a second study investigator).

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
CollaboratorOTHER
Pediatric Clinical Research Platform
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Blinding to the outcomes will be maintained during recruitment to minimize preparation bias. Allocation concealment will be ensured with an allocation software (www.sealedenvelope.com) and will not be released until the participants start the scenario. A post-scenario review will be done without blinding by two study investigators, but undertaken independently with each blinded to the other's reviews. In the case of disagreement, a third independent evaluator will help reach a consensus. The data analyst will not be blinded to group allocation.

Intervention model description

A prospective, single center, randomized, controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any postgraduate residents pursuing a \<6 years residency in pediatrics. * To be registered nurses from the pediatric emergency department. * To have previously completed a standardized 5-min introductory course on the use of the PIMPmyHospital tool dispensed by the study investigators. * Participation agreement.

Exclusion criteria

* To have not undergone the standardized 5-min introductory course on the use of the PIMPmyHospital tool dispensed by the study investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Laboratory Resultsminutes (upper bound arbitrarily set at 2 hours)Time elapsed between the availability of new laboratory results on either the mobile app or the pediatric emergency department's computerized patient data system and their consideration by the participant on the allocated medium (i.e., the mobile app or computerized patient data system), measured using a stopwatch.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Reach Colleaguesminutes (upper bound arbitrarily set at 2 hours)The elapsed time (in minutes) from the moment the participant was informed by the mobile app or a statement given by a study investigator (conventional method) that a nurse required assistance to perform a technical procedure up to the point in time when the participant reached that nurse.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (PIMPmyHospital)
Participants that will use the mHeath PIMPmyHospital tool during the semi-simulation-based scenario. PIMPmyHospital (mHealth tool): Each participant will first be asked to retrieve a factious patient's laboratory results on the app when randomly made available, and then reach a colleague (role played by a study investigator) when asked to do so by a text message on the app.
5
Arm B (Conventional Methods)
Participants that will use conventional methods (i.e., without mobile app support) during the semi-simulation-based scenario. Conventional method: Each participant will first be asked to retrieve a factious patient's laboratory results from the emergency department's computerized patient data system when randomly made available, and then contact a colleague (role played by a study investigator) when asked to do so (request made by a second study investigator).
5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (PIMPmyHospital)Arm B (Conventional Methods)Total
Age, Continuous34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Age, Customized
<30
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Customized
30-39
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
>=40
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Satisfaction with current situation to find a peer3.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Satisfaction with current timelines from laboratory report to review,4.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
5.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
4.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Work experience in the Pediatric Emergency Department
<12
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Work experience in the Pediatric Emergency Department
12-24
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Work experience in the Pediatric Emergency Department
>=24
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Work experience in the Pediatric Emergency Department69.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 72.7
36.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.6
53.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.4
Work experience since certification
<5
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Work experience since certification
5-9
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Work experience since certification
>=9
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Work experience since certification10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
5.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Laboratory Results

Time elapsed between the availability of new laboratory results on either the mobile app or the pediatric emergency department's computerized patient data system and their consideration by the participant on the allocated medium (i.e., the mobile app or computerized patient data system), measured using a stopwatch.

Time frame: minutes (upper bound arbitrarily set at 2 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (PIMPmyHospital)Time to Laboratory Results1 Minutes
Arm B (Conventional Methods)Time to Laboratory Results23 Minutes
Secondary

Time to Reach Colleagues

The elapsed time (in minutes) from the moment the participant was informed by the mobile app or a statement given by a study investigator (conventional method) that a nurse required assistance to perform a technical procedure up to the point in time when the participant reached that nurse.

Time frame: minutes (upper bound arbitrarily set at 2 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (PIMPmyHospital)Time to Reach Colleagues1 Minutes
Arm B (Conventional Methods)Time to Reach Colleagues24 Minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026