Skip to content

Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Sustainability of a Novel Personalized Smartphone Intervention for Suicide - Randomized Trial

Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Sustainability of a Novel Personalized Smartphone Intervention for Suicide

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05202756
Enrollment
31
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2024-06-14
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Suicidal Ideation, Suicide, Suicide and Self-harm, Suicide, Attempted

Brief summary

The primary aim of the present study is leverage existing infrastructure to develop novel technological features for a novel personalized smartphone intervention system, called the Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS), and to establish feasibility, acceptability, safety, and estimate key parameters for primary outcomes (i.e., suicidal ideation and behavior; re-hospitalization), and target mechanisms.

Interventions

Safety Planning Intervention, ecological momentary intervention smartphone app system, and bidirectional communication with study clinician.

BEHAVIORALEMA Monitoring Only

Safety Planning Intervention; ecological momentary assessment only

Sponsors

Butler Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Brown University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior in the past month * Between the ages of 18 and 70 * Able to read, write, and understand English well enough to complete study procedures * Owns a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

* Current psychotic or manic symptoms severe enough to interfere with completion of study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction1 monthMeasured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, a self-report measure of satisfaction with treatment. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores representing higher satisfaction.
Acceptability of Research (Recruitment)BaselineMeasured by recruitment rate.
Acceptability of Research (Dropout)6 monthsMeasured by dropout rate.
Acceptability of Research Procedures1 monthFeedback on qualitative interview.
Acceptability of MAPS Intervention1 monthFeedback on qualitative interview.
Satisfaction with MAPS Intervention4 weeksMeasured by protocol completion rate.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Adherence4 weeksNumber of assessments completed out of total
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior6 monthsWill be assessed using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, items from the Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and ecological momentary assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale can provide presence/absence of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior, as well as a suicidal ideation score ranging from 0 to 5 with higher scores representing more severe ideation, and a suicidal ideation intensity rating from 0-25 with higher scores representing more intense ideation.
Rehospitalization6 monthsNumber of inpatient rehospitalizations will be assessed using the Treatment History Interview and medical records review.
Emergency Department Visits6 monthsNumber of emergency department visits will be assessed using the Treatment History Interview and medical records review.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use of MAPS Intervention-delivered Coping Strategies (target mechanism)4 weeksCoping strategy use will be measured in three ways: (1) when participants are prompted to use a coping strategy via MAPS, followup prompts ask whether or not they used the coping skill, (2) in each EMA survey, participants are asked whether or not they used any coping skills since the last survey, and (3) the system provides output with regard to how many times participants dial a support contact phone number through the MAPS app.
Reduction of Negative Affect (target mechanism)4 weeksNegative affect will be measured using Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-X) items on ecological momentary assessment surveys. Each emotion item on the PANAS-X is rated on a 1-5 scale based on how participants feel, with 1 indicating "very slightly or not at all" and 5 indicating "extremely."
Self-Efficacy (target mechanism)4 weeksCoping self-efficacy will be measured using the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale. Self-efficacy for seeking mental health care will be measured by the Self-Efficacy to Seek Mental Health Care Scale. The total score can range from 0-260; the higher the score, the higher the level of coping self-efficacy.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026