Skip to content

Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Physiological Reactivity and Psychosocial Functioning in Pediatric Patients With Gastrointestinal Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05202418
Enrollment
53
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2022-02-27
Completion date
2024-01-13
Last updated
2025-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Psychological

Keywords

skin conductance reactivity, Systemic inflammation

Brief summary

This is a prospective, assessment-based study to examine the relationship between psychophysiological functioning and psychological symptoms in youth newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to healthy controls.

Detailed description

Similar to other chronic stressors, diagnosis with a chronic illness places youth at risk of adverse psychosocial outcomes. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis are chronic, immune-mediated diseases of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by unpredictable remissions of disease activity followed by relapses of symptoms. Although some research has found higher levels of disease activity to relate to greater depressive symptoms, the overall relationship between disease activity and emotional functioning has been mixed, suggesting that additional individual differences need to be considered in addition to illness-related factors when predicting emotional outcomes. Increased risk for developing anxiety disorders and depression has been documented in youth with IBD. Individual differences in physiological reactivity may affect patients' risk for developing psychosocial difficulties within the context of chronic stress. Additional risk factors for developing psychosocial challenges need to be identified to identify moderators of outcomes above and beyond disease activity. Individual differences in physiological reactivity may affect patients' risk for developing psychosocial difficulties within the context of chronic stress. Physiological reactivity, which broadly refers to bodily reactions in response to a stressor, varies with regards to intensity and threshold for activation between individuals. In youth affected by non-medical chronic stress (e.g., family conflict, trauma history), measures of autonomic dysfunction have been used to explain why some individuals have worse psychological and physical outcomes compared to others exposed to similar levels of chronic stress. Results support autonomic dysfunction as a vulnerability factor for adjustment problems within the context of chronic environmental stress. The current study aims to test whether differences in psychophysiological reactivity serve as risk factors in the relationship between clinical disease activity in youth newly diagnosed with IBD and psychosocial adjustment problems. The relationship between psychophysiological reactivity and psychosocial adjustment problems in youth with IBD will be compared to healthy controls. Youth participants with IBD will be enrolled in a coping skills treatment to test the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral intervention including biofeedback to reduce anxiety and depression and disease symptoms. The research team will conduct a pilot intervention targeting autonomic dysfunction through biofeedback-enhanced coping skills treatment delivered virtually over 6-sessions.

Interventions

The intervention involves biofeedback enhanced cognitive behaviorally based coping skills treatment. Treatment will consist of a 6-visit group intervention conducted online, via Emory zoom. Groups will include 5-8 patients each. Sessions will include brief, daily homework to facilitate mastery that is developmentally tailored to youth (e.g., practice skills with support from phone or tablet apps). Groups will meet approximately every week for 6 weeks. Advanced Ph.D. students in clinical psychology and Principal Investigator will deliver the treatment protocol. Participants will complete questionnaires before and after each session to measure autonomic reactivity, lifetime stress, depression, anxiety in response to stress induction, and coping strategies.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
CollaboratorOTHER
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed IBD * Ages 13 through 18 years inclusive * English fluency for parent and child participants. * Accompanied by at least 1 parent/guardian who is willing to participate * Positive depression or anxiety symptom screen using the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety measures

Exclusion criteria

* Previous diagnosis of intellectual disability * Autism spectrum disorder. * Parent is unwilling to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention Rate6 weeks (End of treatment), and 2 months post treatmentRetention rates will be summarized using the number of individuals who gave consent to participate in the trial, who completed 6 weeks of the intervention they were randomized to, as well as the count of participants completing the Post-Treatment assessment 2 months after finishing 6 weeks of Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Scores Following Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment6 weeks (End of treatment)Acceptability of the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment was assessed using adolescent- and parent-reported program satisfaction ratings on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Adolescents and parents completed this 8-item survey on a 4-point scale, with total scores ranging from 8 to 32; higher scores indicated greater satisfaction. Each group completed the questionnaire 6 weeks after finishing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No survey was provided to participants during the waitlist phase, as no treatment was administered during the waiting period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 6 Weeksbaseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 13-item Depression subscale of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3). The BASC-3 Parent Rating Scale (PRS) is a tool used to evaluate problem behaviors, including internalizing, externalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Parents rate the frequency of these behaviors on a scale from 'Never' to 'Almost Always.' T-scores are used to compare responses to normative data for children of the same age and gender. Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).
Changes in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 2 Months After Completing Treatment Interventionbaseline, 2 months post-treatmentDepressive symptoms were assessed using the 13-item Depression subscale of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3). The BASC-3 Parent Rating Scale (PRS) is a tool used to evaluate problem behaviors, including internalizing, externalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Parents rate the frequency of these behaviors on a scale from 'Never' to 'Almost Always.' T-scores are used to compare responses to normative data for children of the same age and gender. Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).
Changes in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item inventory rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0 Not true or hardly ever true to 2 Very true or often true) used to screen for anxiety disorders. It provides a Total score and scores across five domains: panic/somatic, separation anxiety, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and school phobia. The total score ranges from 0 to 82, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. A score of 25 or higher may suggest an anxiety disorder, while scores above 30 are more specific. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.
Change in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at Six Weeks Compared to Baseline6 weeks (End of treatment)Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) is a child-report measure of physiological, behavioral, and emotional symptoms of depression. It is a widely used tool for assessing depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. It includes 28 items, each with three possible responses that reflect different levels of severity: 0 (absence of symptoms), 1 (mild or probable symptom), or 2 (definite symptom). Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).
Changes in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced Treatmentbaseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)Self-report of disease activity using the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale), will be collected. The GI symptom subscale includes items on nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, bloating, and food-induced discomfort. Each item asks the child to rate the frequency and intensity of symptoms over a specific period (e.g., In the past week, how often have you felt stomachaches?). Response options include: 0 - Not at all; 1 - A little bit; 2 - Somewhat; 3 - Quite a bit; 4 - Very much. Scores are summed to obtain a total score for gastrointestinal symptoms. High scores, indicating frequent or intense gastrointestinal complaints, may suggest significant distress or a need for intervention. A decrease in the score reflects symptom improvement.
Changes in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory- (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) at 2 Months After Completion of Treatment Interventionbaseline, 2 months post-treatmentSelf-report of disease activity using the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory-(CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) will be collected from parents and teens. The GI symptom subscale includes items on nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, bloating, and food-induced discomfort. Each item asks the child to rate the frequency and intensity of symptoms over a specific period (e.g., In the past week, how often have you felt stomachaches?). Response options include: 0 - Not at all; 1 - A little bit; 2 - Somewhat; 3 - Quite a bit; 4 - Very much. Scores are summed to get a total gastrointestinal score. High scores, indicating frequent or intense symptoms, may suggest significant distress or the need for intervention. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.
Change in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)Autonomic reactivity will be measured using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) with the Inner Balance system by HeartMath. HRV will be assessed before treatment, post-treatment, and at follow-up. The mediation effect will be estimated using the difference in regression coefficients (β1 - β2). Adolescent HRV data was collected via the InnerBalance sensor during the pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) assessments. The RR interval represents the time between heartbeats, while the NN interval normalizes this time, accounting for noise or artifacts. HRV measures, including the standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD), are calculated from these intervals. Higher values of SDNN and RMSSD are considered more adaptive.
Changes in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores in Both Groups at 2 Months After Completing Treatmentbaseline, 2 months post treatmentThe Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item inventory rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0 Not true or hardly ever true to 2 Very true or often true) used to screen for anxiety disorders. It provides a Total score and scores across five domains: panic/somatic, separation anxiety, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and school phobia. The total score ranges from 0 to 82, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. A score of 25 or higher may suggest an anxiety disorder, while scores above 30 are more specific. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.
Change in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at 2 Months Post-treatment Compared to Baseline2 months post-Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChildren's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2). The CDI 2 is a child-report measure of physiological, behavioral, and emotional symptoms of depression. The full-length CDI 2: Self-Report (CDI 2:SR) is a 28-item assessment that yields a Total Score, two scale scores, and four subscale scores. For each item, the respondent is presented with three choices that correspond to three levels of symptomatology: 0 (absence of symptoms), 1 (mild or probable symptom), or 2 (definite symptom). Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA) at Egleston in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began on February 27, 2022, and 3 rounds of treatment and paired waitlist groups were held. All follow-ups were complete by January 13, 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants in the waitlist control group completed lifetime stress, autonomic reactivity, depression, and anxiety surveys at baseline and 6 weeks. A 2-month follow-up was not conducted during the waitlist period, as the biofeedback intervention was given after 6 weeks. After completing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment, participants took part in the 2-month follow-up assessments. All 2-month follow-up data were then combined and analyzed for both groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment
Participants will engage in biofeedback-enhanced, cognitive-behavioral coping skills treatment. Sessions will include brief, daily homework assignments tailored to youth (e.g., using apps for skill practice). Participants will complete pre- and post-session questionnaires to assess autonomic reactivity, lifetime stress, depression, anxiety, and coping strategies in response to stress induction. Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment: The intervention involves biofeedback enhanced cognitive behaviorally based coping skills treatment. Treatment will consist of a 6-visit group intervention conducted online, via Emory Zoom. Groups will include 5-8 patients each. Sessions will include brief, daily homework to facilitate mastery, developmentally tailored to youth (e.g., practice skills with support from phone or tablet apps). Groups will meet approximately every week for 6 weeks. Advanced Ph.D. students in clinical psychology and the Principal Investigator will deliver the treatment protocol. Participants will complete questionnaires before and after each session to measure autonomic reactivity, lifetime stress, depression, anxiety in response to stress induction, and coping strategies.
24
Wait-list Control
Participants randomized to the wait-list control group will complete the same measures of lifetime stress, autonomic reactivity, depression, and anxiety. The intervention was offered to control participants after the 6-week time point, and all 2-month follow-up surveys and assessments were completed only after finishing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment.
27
Total51

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalBiofeedback Enhanced TreatmentWait-list Control
Age, Continuous15.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46
14.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38
15.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
Caregiver relationship to the child
Father
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Caregiver relationship to the child
Mother
46 Participants24 Participants22 Participants
Caregiver relationship to the child
Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
$100,000 to $124,999
10 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
$125,000 to $149,999
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
$25,000 to $49,999
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
$50,000 to $74,999
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
$75,000 to $99,999
7 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
Above $150,000
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Estimated household yearly income before taxes
Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
50 Participants24 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Diagnosis
Crohn's Disease
36 Participants16 Participants20 Participants
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Diagnosis
Indeterminate Colitis
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Diagnosis
Ulcerative Colitis
14 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
45 Participants23 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 Participants24 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants17 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Time since diagnosis3.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69
2.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.57
3.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Scores Following Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment

Acceptability of the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment was assessed using adolescent- and parent-reported program satisfaction ratings on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Adolescents and parents completed this 8-item survey on a 4-point scale, with total scores ranging from 8 to 32; higher scores indicated greater satisfaction. Each group completed the questionnaire 6 weeks after finishing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No survey was provided to participants during the waitlist phase, as no treatment was administered during the waiting period.

Time frame: 6 weeks (End of treatment)

Population: Satisfaction data applies only to the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment (BET), as the control group did not receive treatment during the first 6 weeks. Satisfaction was assessed after both groups had completed their treatments, and the data were combined for analysis. These results include data from participants who completed the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment and the satisfaction surveys 6 weeks post-treatment (BET), with data from both groups analyzed after treatment completion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentClient Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Scores Following Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChild Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)28.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentClient Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Scores Following Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentParent Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)28.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Primary

Retention Rate

Retention rates will be summarized using the number of individuals who gave consent to participate in the trial, who completed 6 weeks of the intervention they were randomized to, as well as the count of participants completing the Post-Treatment assessment 2 months after finishing 6 weeks of Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment.

Time frame: 6 weeks (End of treatment), and 2 months post treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentRetention RateRetention at 6 weeks (End of treatment)23 Participants
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentRetention RateRetention at 2 months post-treatment19 Participants
Wait-list ControlRetention RateRetention at 6 weeks (End of treatment)25 Participants
Wait-list ControlRetention RateRetention at 2 months post-treatment22 Participants
Secondary

Change in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)

Autonomic reactivity will be measured using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) with the Inner Balance system by HeartMath. HRV will be assessed before treatment, post-treatment, and at follow-up. The mediation effect will be estimated using the difference in regression coefficients (β1 - β2). Adolescent HRV data was collected via the InnerBalance sensor during the pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) assessments. The RR interval represents the time between heartbeats, while the NN interval normalizes this time, accounting for noise or artifacts. HRV measures, including the standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD), are calculated from these intervals. Higher values of SDNN and RMSSD are considered more adaptive.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChange in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)RMSSD at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-4.09 milliseconds (ms)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChange in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)SDNN at 6 weeks (End of treatment)15.6 milliseconds (ms)
Wait-list ControlChange in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)SDNN at 6 weeks (End of treatment)16.74 milliseconds (ms)
Wait-list ControlChange in Autonomic Reactivity at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)RMSSD at 6 weeks (End of treatment)16.02 milliseconds (ms)
Secondary

Change in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at 2 Months Post-treatment Compared to Baseline

Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2). The CDI 2 is a child-report measure of physiological, behavioral, and emotional symptoms of depression. The full-length CDI 2: Self-Report (CDI 2:SR) is a 28-item assessment that yields a Total Score, two scale scores, and four subscale scores. For each item, the respondent is presented with three choices that correspond to three levels of symptomatology: 0 (absence of symptoms), 1 (mild or probable symptom), or 2 (definite symptom). Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).

Time frame: 2 months post-Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment

Population: The results include data from participants in both groups after completing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No 2-month follow-up data were collected from the control group during the waiting period, as they received the intervention at 6 weeks. Data were collected 2 months after completing the treatment in each group, and these were combined for analysis, as specified in the protocol, which outlines that the changes will be summarized within groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChange in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at 2 Months Post-treatment Compared to Baseline-4.17 T-score
Secondary

Change in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at Six Weeks Compared to Baseline

Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) is a child-report measure of physiological, behavioral, and emotional symptoms of depression. It is a widely used tool for assessing depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. It includes 28 items, each with three possible responses that reflect different levels of severity: 0 (absence of symptoms), 1 (mild or probable symptom), or 2 (definite symptom). Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).

Time frame: 6 weeks (End of treatment)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the baseline survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChange in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at Six Weeks Compared to Baseline-1.99 T-score
Wait-list ControlChange in the Children's Depression Inventory 2 (CDI-2) at Six Weeks Compared to Baseline0.00 T-score
Secondary

Changes in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores in Both Groups at 2 Months After Completing Treatment

The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item inventory rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0 Not true or hardly ever true to 2 Very true or often true) used to screen for anxiety disorders. It provides a Total score and scores across five domains: panic/somatic, separation anxiety, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and school phobia. The total score ranges from 0 to 82, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. A score of 25 or higher may suggest an anxiety disorder, while scores above 30 are more specific. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.

Time frame: baseline, 2 months post treatment

Population: The results include data from participants in both groups after completing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No 2-month follow-up data were collected from the control group during the waiting period, as they received the intervention at 6 weeks. Data were collected 2 months after completing the treatment in each group, and these were combined for analysis, as specified in the protocol, which outlines that the changes will be summarized within groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores in Both Groups at 2 Months After Completing TreatmentChild Report at 2 months post treatment (End of treatment)-4.28 Score on a scale
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores in Both Groups at 2 Months After Completing TreatmentParent Report at 2 months post treatment-1.87 Score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 2 Months After Completing Treatment Intervention

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 13-item Depression subscale of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3). The BASC-3 Parent Rating Scale (PRS) is a tool used to evaluate problem behaviors, including internalizing, externalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Parents rate the frequency of these behaviors on a scale from 'Never' to 'Almost Always.' T-scores are used to compare responses to normative data for children of the same age and gender. Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).

Time frame: baseline, 2 months post-treatment

Population: The results include data from participants in both groups after completing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No 2-month follow-up data were collected from the control group during the waiting period, as they received the intervention at 6 weeks. Data were collected 2 months after completing the treatment in each group, and these were combined for analysis, as specified in the protocol, which outlines that the changes will be summarized within groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 2 Months After Completing Treatment Intervention-4.60 T-score
Secondary

Changes in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 6 Weeks

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 13-item Depression subscale of the Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd Edition (BASC-3). The BASC-3 Parent Rating Scale (PRS) is a tool used to evaluate problem behaviors, including internalizing, externalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Parents rate the frequency of these behaviors on a scale from 'Never' to 'Almost Always.' T-scores are used to compare responses to normative data for children of the same age and gender. Raw scores are converted to t-scores ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms (depressive symptoms decrease over time).

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 6 Weeks-3.64 T-score
Wait-list ControlChanges in the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Depression Parent Rating Scale at 6 Weeks0.44 T-score
Secondary

Changes in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment

Self-report of disease activity using the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale), will be collected. The GI symptom subscale includes items on nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, bloating, and food-induced discomfort. Each item asks the child to rate the frequency and intensity of symptoms over a specific period (e.g., In the past week, how often have you felt stomachaches?). Response options include: 0 - Not at all; 1 - A little bit; 2 - Somewhat; 3 - Quite a bit; 4 - Very much. Scores are summed to obtain a total score for gastrointestinal symptoms. High scores, indicating frequent or intense gastrointestinal complaints, may suggest significant distress or a need for intervention. A decrease in the score reflects symptom improvement.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentParent Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-2.79 Score on a scale
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChild Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-1.29 Score on a scale
Wait-list ControlChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChild Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)0.56 Score on a scale
Wait-list ControlChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) After Completion of Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentParent Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-0.12 Score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory- (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) at 2 Months After Completion of Treatment Intervention

Self-report of disease activity using the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory-(CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) will be collected from parents and teens. The GI symptom subscale includes items on nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, bloating, and food-induced discomfort. Each item asks the child to rate the frequency and intensity of symptoms over a specific period (e.g., In the past week, how often have you felt stomachaches?). Response options include: 0 - Not at all; 1 - A little bit; 2 - Somewhat; 3 - Quite a bit; 4 - Very much. Scores are summed to get a total gastrointestinal score. High scores, indicating frequent or intense symptoms, may suggest significant distress or the need for intervention. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.

Time frame: baseline, 2 months post-treatment

Population: The results include data from participants in both groups after completing the Biofeedback Enhanced Treatment. No 2-month follow-up data were collected from the control group during the waiting period, as they received the intervention at 6 weeks. Data were collected 2 months after completing the treatment in each group, and these were combined for analysis, as specified in the protocol, which outlines that the changes will be summarized within groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory- (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) at 2 Months After Completion of Treatment InterventionParent Report at 2 months post-treatment (End of treatment)-0.01 Score on a scale
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory- (CSSI) 7-item (GI Subscale) at 2 Months After Completion of Treatment InterventionChild Report at 2 months post-treatment(End of treatment)0.62 Score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)

The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item inventory rated on a 3-point Likert scale (0 Not true or hardly ever true to 2 Very true or often true) used to screen for anxiety disorders. It provides a Total score and scores across five domains: panic/somatic, separation anxiety, generalized anxiety, social anxiety, and school phobia. The total score ranges from 0 to 82, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. A score of 25 or higher may suggest an anxiety disorder, while scores above 30 are more specific. A decrease in score reflects symptom improvement.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks (End of treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)Child Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-5.05 Score on a scale
Biofeedback Enhanced TreatmentChanges in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)Parent Report 6 weeks (End of treatment)-1.87 Score on a scale
Wait-list ControlChanges in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)Child Report at 6 weeks (End of treatment)-0.67 Score on a scale
Wait-list ControlChanges in the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) Scores at 6 Weeks (End of Treatment)Parent Report 6 weeks (End of treatment)-1.84 Score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026