Skip to content

Sutures Versus Polyglactin Mesh in Hiatal Hernia Repair

Sutures Only Versus Absorbable Polyglactin (Vicryl®) Mesh in Closure of Hiatal Defect in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05201508
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2022-01-21
Completion date
2043-01-01
Last updated
2023-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiatal Hernia, Hiatal Hernia, Paraesophageal, Paraesophageal Hernia, Recurrence

Brief summary

Paraesophageal hernia causes pain, heartburn, regurgitation, anemia and in extreme, life-threatening strangulation. For symptomatic patients, laparoscopic surgery is offered which includes hiatal defect closure and antireflux surgery. However, recurrence rates are high between 12 and 42%. In order to reduce recurrences, mesh has been used with various materials and techniques with conflicting results. Non-absorbable mesh has been linked with adverse events including erosion of esophageal wall. Traditionally used biological mesh materials are expensive and therefore problematic in routine use. Use of polyglactin (Vicryl®) mesh, which degrades in 6-8 week, has been reported in paraesophageal hernia surgery. Previously, no randomized controlled trial comparing sutures only and polyglactin mesh has been performed. In this trial, the aim was to randomize total of 110 patients to receive sutures only or mesh repair. Primary outcome was recurrence of paraesophageal hernia at 6 months after the repair based on computed tomography scan. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic recurrences, reoperation rate, quality of life, reoperations up to 20-years after surgery and use of proton pump inhibitors up to 20-years after surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPolyglactin mesh

Polyglactin mesh is used in keyhole manner to enforce hiatal closure

PROCEDURESutures only

Traditional hiatal closure with non-absorbable sutures.

Sponsors

Central Finland Hospital District
CollaboratorOTHER
Oulu University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective open label randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 years old * Type III-IV PEH with either radiologic or endoscopic confirmation * Scheduled for laparoscopic PEH repair * The informed consent is acquired

Exclusion criteria

* Need for esophagus lengthening procedure (Collis gastroplasty) * Recurrent PEH * Emergency surgery * No written consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic recurrence of PEH6 months after surgeryComputed tomography based recurrence after sutures only versus polyglactin mesh

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reoperation rate20 yearsReoperation rate related to hiatal hernia recurrence
Health related quality of life based on score in esophago-gastric questionnaire (EORTC qlq-og25)6 monthsThe impact of PEH repair method to health-related quality of life score in esophago-gastric questionnaire (EORTC qlq-og25) at 6 months compared to preoperative level. Score is given between 25 and 100 points with higher score meaning worse quality of life.
Hiatal defect size related to recurrence rate6 monthsThe correlation with size of hiatal defect (cm\^2) to recurrence rate (scatter plot with defect size in x-axis and recurrent hernias in y-axis)
Symptomatic versus asymptomatic recurrence rates6 monthsSymptomatic versus asymptomatic recurrence rates based on symptoms and radiographic finding
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use20 yearsUse on proton pump inhibitors at 1- 3-, 5-, 10- and 20-years after surgery related to intervention method (sutures only or polyglactin mesh)
Age and the risk of recurrence6 monthsThe correlation of age (years) to recurrence rate (scatter plot with age in x-axis and recurrent hernias in y-axis)
Albumin level and the risk of recurrence6 monthsThe correlation of nutritional status (albumin level) to recurrence rate (scatter plot with albumin in x-axis and recurrent hernias in y-axis)
BMI and the risk of recurrence6 monthsThe correlation of BMI to recurrence rate (scatter plot with BMI in x-axis and recurrent hernias in y-axis)

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactOlli Helminen, MD, PhD
olli.helminen@oulu.fi+35883152011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026