Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation
Conditions
Keywords
the local anesthesia, Lidocaine 2%, Articaine 4%, children, MIH molars.
Brief summary
Aims: Comparison of injection pain with lidocaine and articaine in children with MIH . Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine during treatment of MIH molars. Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study including twenty cooperative children, aged 6-12years old
Detailed description
Background and Aims: Effectively achieving anesthesia is one of the difficulties a dentist faces when treating MIH molar There are no studies comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in MIH molar Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study including twenty cooperative children , aged 6-12 years old Each child will receive either lidocaine or articaine at their first or second visit.
Interventions
DRUGLidocaine 2%
The child will be injected with lidocaine 2% and After 10 minutes the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and pain after injection and treatment will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale
DRUGArticaine 4%
The child will be injected with 4% Articaine and After 10 minutes the treatment will be completed , Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and face scale
Sponsors
Tishreen University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Masking description
The participant will be blinded, the drug administrator will be blinded too, and the investigator who will give the treatment and explain the pain scale to the participant and ask him\\her to point to the face that fits the degree of his pain that associated with the drug administration will also be blinded.
Intervention model description
A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study, Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2%
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Absolute positive or positive behavior according to the Frankel Scale. * Healthy, both physically and mentally. * Do not take medications that interfere with the assessment of pain within 24 hours prior to treatment. * A child with a MIH-affected mandibular permanent first molar on the right and left sides .
Exclusion criteria
* Teeth with non-response pulpitis Inflammation at the injection site. * Allergy to the substances used in anesthesia. * Presence of general or developmental medical conditions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| dental pain | during the injection of local anesthesia | evaluated by outcome assessor using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Rating Scale ( FLACC scale ) ( a behavioral pain assessment scale which has five criteria face, legs, activity, cry, consolability ,which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.Total score of scale is summed in range 0 to 10, where: 0=relaxed and comfortable; 1-3=mild discomfort; 4-6=moderate pain; 7-10=severe pain).. |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed