Skip to content

The Role of Altered Nutrient Partitioning in Food Reward

The Role of Altered Nutrient Partitioning in Food Reward

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05200845
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2022-02-23
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight and Obesity

Brief summary

Obesity remains a public health epidemic despite substantial advances in treatment strategies and therapies in the last decade. Effective strategies to support maintenance of improved metabolic health and reduced body weight are still needed. Signals from the gut to the brain are important in regulating metabolism and energy balance and have been linked with food reward and preference in metabolically healthy individuals with normal body mass index. In particular, post-ingestive signaling related to glucose metabolism has been linked with food reward and preference. However, not much is known about how these gut and brain signals interact to influence eating behaviors in states of obesity or altered metabolic health. In addition, evidence in rodent models and human studies indicates obesity is associated with a blunted brain response to foods compared with normal body weight. However, whether altered nutrient utilization, termed metabolic inflexibility, influences the relationship between obesity and food reward has yet to be studied. The overall objective of this proof-of-concept pilot study is to assess the feasibility of measuring reward response following a flavor-nutrient conditioning paradigm across the normal to obese body mass index (BMI) range and in states of altered metabolic health. The aims of this study are: 1) to determine whether differences in reinforcement learning/flavor-nutrient conditioning of carbohydrate can be measured across the body mass index range; and 2) to determine the feasibility of assessing metabolic flexibility and whether a relationship between metabolic flexibility and calorie-predictive reward can be detected.

Interventions

OTHERConditioned Stimulus + (CS+): Flavored beverage solution with 75 calories of sucrose

Participants will consume flavored beverage solutions containing 75 calories of sucrose in 6 exposure sessions within 1 week. One exposure session will include pre- and post-consumption blood draws over a 2-hour period, and one exposure session will include indirect calorimetry measurement pre- and post-consumption. The other 4 exposure sessions will occur at specified times outside the laboratory sessions. Subjective ratings of internal state (i.e., hunger, fullness, and thirst) will be collected throughout each exposure. Subjective ratings of liking and wanting of each beverage will also be assessed.

OTHERConditioned Stimulus - (CS-): Flavored beverage solution with sweetness-matched sucralose

Participants will consume flavored beverage solutions sweetened with sucralose to match the sweetness of 75 calories of sucrose in 6 exposure sessions within 1 week. One exposure session will include pre- and post-consumption blood draws over a 2-hour period, and one exposure session will include indirect calorimetry measurement pre- and post-consumption. The other 4 exposure sessions will occur at specified times outside the laboratory sessions. Subjective ratings of internal state (i.e., hunger, fullness, and thirst) will be collected throughout each exposure. Subjective ratings of liking and wanting of each beverage will also be assessed.

OTHERHigh-Fat Test Meal Inside a Metabolic Chamber

A high-fat test meal (60% fat, 20% carbohydrate) will be provided after a 1-hour baseline measurement of substrate oxidation during a 6-hour metabolic chamber stay. Postprandial substrate oxidation will be measured for 5 hours.

OTHERHigh-Carbohydrate Test Meal Inside a Metabolic Chamber

A high-carbohydrate test meal (60% carbohydrate, 20% fat) will be provided after a 1-hour baseline measurement of substrate oxidation during a 6-hour metabolic chamber stay. Postprandial substrate oxidation will be measured for 5 hours.

A subset of participants with BMI \> 25 will be invited to complete an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan as a feasibility measure. fMRI scans will be performed while beverages (without calories) used during the intervention are delivered through a custom manifold fitted to a head coil and connected to a pump system that allows precisely timed and measured delivery of liquids. Because this is feasibility-based measure, the outcome is a count of participants who completed this task.

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. BMI between 18.5-40 kg/m2 2. Not pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study participation 3. Residing in the Roanoke area and/or willing/able to attend sessions at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute 4. Able to speak and write in English 5. Specific to fMRI scan only: BMI between 25-35 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. Current inhaled nicotine use 2. History of alcohol dependence. 3. Current or past diagnosis of diabetes or thyroid problems. 4. Glycated hemoglobin (Hemoglobin A1C) \>5.7% 5. Taking medications known to influence study measures (including antiglycemic agents, thyroid medications, sleep medications) 6. Active medical or neurologic disorder. 7. Recent change in body weight (gain or loss of \> 5 lbs within the past 3 months) 8. Current shift work (typical pattern of work/activity overnight) 9. Previous weight loss surgery 10. Adherence to a special diet within the past 3 months (e.g., low-carb or ketogenic diet, exclusion of food groups/specific macronutrients, intermittent fasting, etc.) 11. Allergy to any food or ingredient included in the study diets, meals, or beverages 12. Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study participation 13. Claustrophobia 14. Contraindications for MRI, including pacemaker, aneurysm clips, neurostimulators, cochlear or other implants, metal in eyes, regular work with steel, etc. (Note: This is an fMRI-specific exclusion criterion. Participants may be allowed to participate in all other study sessions and measures that do not involve fMRI.) 15. Contraindications for bioelectrical impedance analysis, specifically implanted devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Preference- LikingBaseline and at 4 weeksSubjective ratings of liking of flavors used in the intervention were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. The generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale will be used. The scale is anchored by descriptors of Most Disliked Sensation Imaginable and Most Liked Sensation Imaginable at the lower and upper ends, respectively. The score is determined by the place on the scale participants select (range of scale is 0-100). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates an increase in liking.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Preference- Wanting30-minute measurementAd libitum intake will be used as a measure of wanting in a post-test session. Participants will be provided each beverage used during the intervention and asked to drink as much or as little of them as they would like over a 30-minute period. Total beverage intake over 30 minutes is reported as the outcome.
Blood Oxygen Level-dependent (BOLD) Response to Beverages30-minute measurement that occurs during the post-test, approximately 4 weeks after the first study sessionIn a post-test session, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans were performed while beverages (without calories) used during the intervention and a tasteless solution are delivered through a custom manifold fitted to a head coil and connected to a pump system that allows precisely timed and measured delivery of liquids. Only participants with BMI \> 25 were invited to complete this portion of the study, per our protocol. In total, participants receive the CS+, CS-, and tasteless (control) solutions 24 times over the course of 2 runs. Contrasts of interest are the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response of CS+\>tasteless solution and CS-\>tasteless solution deliveries. Parameter estimates for these contrasts are extracted and reported. A positive outcome reflects greater whole-brain BOLD response for the CS condition compared with a tasteless solution.
Substrate Oxidation Response to Test Meals6-hour measurementIndirect calorimetry in a metabolic chamber will be used to assess substrate oxidation response to high-fat and high-carbohydrate test meals.
Blood Glucose Response to Beverages2-hour measurementBlood glucose will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in one exposure session.
Post-test Preference - WantingBaseline and at 4 weeksSubjective ratings of wanting of flavors used in the intervention will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention. A Visual Analog Scale will be used. Participants select a place on the line that corresponds with their subjective rating, and the score is determined by the place selected (range of scores is 0-100). The line is anchored by polar opposite descriptors (Do not want at all and Want very much). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates and increase in wanting.
Energy Expenditure in Response to Beverages1.5-hour measurementIndirect calorimetry will be used to determine energy expenditure at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.
Respiratory Exchange Ratio in Response to Beverages1.5-hour measurementIndirect calorimetry will be used to determine respiratory exchange ratio (RER) at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session. Areas under the curve for change in RER were calculated for each condition and presented as outcomes.
Substrate Oxidation in Response to Beverages1.5-hour measurementIndirect calorimetry will be used to determine substrate oxidation at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.
Blood Insulin Response to Beverages2-hour measurementBlood insulin will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 2 hours after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

20 individuals were screened for eligibility between February 1, 2022 and May 1, 2023 in Roanoke, VA.

Pre-assignment details

16 of 20 participants were randomized. Of those not randomized, 3 did not meet inclusion criteria and 1 declined to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+) Then Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-), and High Fat Meal Then High Carb Meal
Participants underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverage solutions containing sucrose first. Then, they underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverages containing sucralose. Participants underwent the high fat meal test session inside the metabolic chamber first. Then they underwent the high carbohydrate test meal session.
3
Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-) Then Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+), and High Fat Meal Then High Carb Meal
Participants underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverage solutions containing sucralose first. Then, they underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverages containing sucrose. Participants underwent the high fat meal test session inside the metabolic chamber first. Then they underwent the high carbohydrate test meal session.
5
Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-) Then Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+), and High Carb Meal Then High Fat Meal
Participants underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverage solutions containing sucralose first. Then, they underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverages containing sucrose. Participants underwent the high carbohydrate meal test session inside the metabolic chamber first. Then they underwent the high fat test meal session.
5
Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+) Then Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-), and High Carb Meal Then High Fat Meal
Participants underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverage solutions containing sucrose first. Then, they underwent exposure sessions with flavored beverages containing sucralose. Participants underwent the high carbohydrate meal test session inside the metabolic chamber first. Then they underwent the high fat test meal session.
3
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall Studystopped collecting pilot data for metabolic chamber1120
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConditioned Stimulus+ (CS+) Then Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-), and High Fat Meal Then High Carb MealTotalConditioned Stimulus+ (CS+) Then Conditioned Stimulus- (CS-), and High Carb Meal Then High Fat MealConditioned Stimulus- (CS-) Then Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+), and High Carb Meal Then High Fat MealConditioned Stimulus- (CS-) Then Conditioned Stimulus+ (CS+), and High Fat Meal Then High Carb Meal
Age, Continuous30.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
30.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
30.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
26.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants15 Participants3 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants13 Participants3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants16 participants5 participants5 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants9 Participants1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants7 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 160 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 120 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Preference- Liking

Subjective ratings of liking of flavors used in the intervention were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. The generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale will be used. The scale is anchored by descriptors of Most Disliked Sensation Imaginable and Most Liked Sensation Imaginable at the lower and upper ends, respectively. The score is determined by the place on the scale participants select (range of scale is 0-100). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates an increase in liking.

Time frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Change in Preference- Liking6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Change in Preference- Liking4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Blood Glucose Response to Beverages

Blood glucose will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in one exposure session.

Time frame: 2-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Blood Glucose Response to Beverages882.4 mg/dl*minStandard Deviation 404.5
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Blood Glucose Response to Beverages37.9 mg/dl*minStandard Deviation 315.6
Secondary

Blood Insulin Response to Beverages

Blood insulin will be assessed at baseline and at set time points for 2 hours after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

Time frame: 2-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Blood Insulin Response to Beverages694.4 uIU/ml*minStandard Deviation 601
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Blood Insulin Response to Beverages39.2 uIU/ml*minStandard Deviation 132.9
Secondary

Blood Oxygen Level-dependent (BOLD) Response to Beverages

In a post-test session, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans were performed while beverages (without calories) used during the intervention and a tasteless solution are delivered through a custom manifold fitted to a head coil and connected to a pump system that allows precisely timed and measured delivery of liquids. Only participants with BMI \> 25 were invited to complete this portion of the study, per our protocol. In total, participants receive the CS+, CS-, and tasteless (control) solutions 24 times over the course of 2 runs. Contrasts of interest are the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response of CS+\>tasteless solution and CS-\>tasteless solution deliveries. Parameter estimates for these contrasts are extracted and reported. A positive outcome reflects greater whole-brain BOLD response for the CS condition compared with a tasteless solution.

Time frame: 30-minute measurement that occurs during the post-test, approximately 4 weeks after the first study session

Population: The sample size is smaller for this measure due to the feasibility assessment nature of the measure. Only a subset of our recruited participants were invited to complete this measure. Only individuals with BMI \> 25 were recruited for this portion of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Blood Oxygen Level-dependent (BOLD) Response to Beverages0.0615 arbitrary unitsStandard Deviation 0.194
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Blood Oxygen Level-dependent (BOLD) Response to Beverages0.0467 arbitrary unitsStandard Deviation 0.1025
Secondary

Change in Preference- Wanting

Ad libitum intake will be used as a measure of wanting in a post-test session. Participants will be provided each beverage used during the intervention and asked to drink as much or as little of them as they would like over a 30-minute period. Total beverage intake over 30 minutes is reported as the outcome.

Time frame: 30-minute measurement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Change in Preference- Wanting187.4 mlStandard Deviation 152.2
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Change in Preference- Wanting147.3 mlStandard Deviation 140.6
Secondary

Change in Preference- Wanting

Forced choice will be used as a measure of wanting in a post-test session. Participants will be provided each of the beverages used during the intervention and asked to choose 1 to take home with them. The outcome variable is a count of number of participants who chose each beverage condition during the forced choice test.

Time frame: 5-minute measurement

Population: In the post-test session, participants are asked to choose between the CS+ and CS- beverage which they would like to take home in a forced choice test.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Change in Preference- Wanting9 Participants
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Change in Preference- Wanting6 Participants
Secondary

Energy Expenditure in Response to Beverages

Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine energy expenditure at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

Time frame: 1.5-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Energy Expenditure in Response to Beverages3.11 kcal/min*minStandard Deviation 2.97
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Energy Expenditure in Response to Beverages0.76 kcal/min*minStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Post-test Preference - Wanting

Subjective ratings of wanting of flavors used in the intervention will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention. A Visual Analog Scale will be used. Participants select a place on the line that corresponds with their subjective rating, and the score is determined by the place selected (range of scores is 0-100). The line is anchored by polar opposite descriptors (Do not want at all and Want very much). An increase in score from baseline to post-intervention indicates and increase in wanting.

Time frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Post-test Preference - Wanting50.6 units on a scale
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Post-test Preference - Wanting47.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Respiratory Exchange Ratio in Response to Beverages

Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine respiratory exchange ratio (RER) at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session. Areas under the curve for change in RER were calculated for each condition and presented as outcomes.

Time frame: 1.5-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Respiratory Exchange Ratio in Response to Beverages2.9 ratio*minutesStandard Deviation 1.7
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Respiratory Exchange Ratio in Response to Beverages0.8 ratio*minutesStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Substrate Oxidation in Response to Beverages

Indirect calorimetry will be used to determine substrate oxidation at baseline (for 30 minutes) and for 1 hour after consumption of intervention beverages in an exposure session.

Time frame: 1.5-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Substrate Oxidation in Response to Beverages3.5 carbohydrate oxidation grams/min*minStandard Deviation 2
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Substrate Oxidation in Response to Beverages0.9 carbohydrate oxidation grams/min*minStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Substrate Oxidation Response to Test Meals

Indirect calorimetry in a metabolic chamber will be used to assess substrate oxidation response to high-fat and high-carbohydrate test meals.

Time frame: 6-hour measurement

Population: Smaller sample size due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conditioned Stimulus + (CS+)Substrate Oxidation Response to Test Meals4.6 fat oxidation grams/min*minStandard Deviation 3.7
Conditioned Stimulus - (CS-)Substrate Oxidation Response to Test Meals-3.5 fat oxidation grams/min*minStandard Deviation 3.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026