Skip to content

Standardization of Quantitative Muscle Ultrasonographic Parameters Among Egyptian Population

Standardization of Quantitative Muscle Ultrasonographic Parameters Among Egyptian Population

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05200780
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2022-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Disease

Brief summary

1-standardization of semi quantitative muscle ultrasonographic parameters ( muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) ) in healthy adults and to obtain a set of normal values of all accessible muscle in both upper and lower limbs. 2.standardizaition of quantitative muscle ultrasonographic parameters (Gray scale level (GSL), Calibrated muscle backscatter values (cMBs), Optical Density (OD), 2D Textu1) in healthy adults and to obtain a set of normal values of all accessible muscle in both upper and lower limbs.

Detailed description

. Ultrasound is a widely used imaging technique in many different medical specialties. It is a non-invasive, safe and relatively cheap investigation method. Ultrasound is a non-invasive method to quantitatively measure various muscle parameters. Ultrasound imaging (US) has shown to be capable of visualizing normal and pathological skeletal muscles.(1) By measuring muscle thickness (MT) and echo intensity (EI) (=grey-value) of the muscle, structural changes caused by neuromuscular disorders can be detected. (2, 3, 4) Quantitative evaluation of US images is preferable over visual evaluation, because it is more sensitive and objective and offers the possibility to perform statistical analysis.(5) A prerequisite for the diagnostic use of quantitative muscle US is the availability of normal reference values. Ultrasonography can detect structural muscle changes caused by neuromuscular disease. Quantitative analysis is the preferred method to determine if ultrasound findings are within normal limits, but normative data are incomplete.(6)

Interventions

DEVICEultrasound

All subjects will undergo the tests with the same machine. Transverse ultrasound images were obtained using the Philips HD with a 4-12 MHz probe. in neurosonology unit in neurology department.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy subjects were recruited amongst colleagues and family members of the researchers 2. Age group (5-70)years 3. Male and female.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient refuse to participate 2. The anatomy is altered due to sever trauma,tumor,or surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
get a refrence for ultrasonographic parameters muscle10 months1. use new, easy ,non-invasive tool neuromuscular ultrasound 2. ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle. 1\_use new, easy ,non-invasive tool neuromuscular ultrasound 2\_ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle.1\_use new, easy ,non-invasive tool neuromuscular ultrasound 2\_ultrasound give important morphological information of the muscles and can differentiate normal and diseased muscle.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
detect early pathological changes in muscles8 monthsUltrasonography give pathophysiological insights and substantially added to diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions amongst myopathies

Contacts

Primary Contactdoaa soliman abdelhafeez
doaasoliman133555@gmail.com01033427347
Backup ContactKhaled Osama Mohamed, Ass .prof
Khalednao26@gmail.com01003012229

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026