Skip to content

Vascular Response of Orsiro vs. Xience Drug-Eluting Stents for Treating Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

A Randomized, Parallel, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Vascular Response of Orsiro vs. Xience Drug Eluting Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05200637
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-01-21
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Drug-eluting stents, Coronary bifurcation lesions, Double-kissing crush technique, Optical coherence tomography

Brief summary

This study aims to compare vessel response and clinical outcomes of a biodegradable-polymer, ultra-thin strut, drug-eluting stent (Orsiro, Biotronik) and a durable-polymer, thin-strut, drug-eluting stent (Xience, Abbott) for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with two-stent double-kissing crush technique. How the differences in stent platforms affect vessel healing process will be examined by optical coherence tomography.

Detailed description

Patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina \[1, 1, 1\] or \[0, 1, 1\]) will be enrolled and randomized to undergo two-stent double kissing crush technique with Orsiro or Xience. Pre-intervention and post-stenting optical coherence tomography will be performed during the index procedure. Another parallel prospective registry will enroll patients with bifurcation lesions treated with provisional one-stent strategy. All subjects will receive coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography follow-up at 3 and 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEOrsiro stent

Orsiro stent

Xience stent

DEVICEAny drug-eluting stent

Any drug-eluting stent

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions will be randomized to undergo two-stent DK-crush technique with Orsiro or Xience. Another parallel prospective registry will enroll patients with bifurcation lesions treated with provisional one-stent strategy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients who are at least 20 years old and present with acute or chronic coronary syndrome. 2. Patients who are suitable for PCI with DES implantation and provide written informed consent. 3. Patients with coronary bifurcation lesion amenable to be treated with 2-stent double-kissing (DK) crush technique. 4. Target vessels suitable for OCT examination. 5. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy (serum and/or urine) test within 7 days prior to index procedure in accordance with the institutional standard of care. Female subjects who are surgically sterile or post-menopausal are exempt from having a pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient who are not suitable candidates for use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 2. Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 3. Liver cirrhosis 4. Life expectancy \< 1 year 5. Planned surgery within 3 months 6. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, or plan to be pregnant in the coming 12 months 7. Target bifurcation lesion involved in chronic total occlusion or the culprit vessel of ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of stent strut coverage at bifurcation segments3 months post-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of in-stent intimal hyperplasia (mm3) at bifurcation segments3 months post-procedure
Amount of in-segment intimal hyperplasia (mm3) at bifurcation segments3 months post-procedure
Percentage of acquired malapposed struts at bifurcation segments3 months post-procedure
Percentage of stent strut coverage at bifurcation segments12 months post-procedure
In-stent late-lumen loss by quantitative coronary analysis3 months post-procedure
In-segment late lumen loss by quantitative coronary analysis3 months post-procedure
Neointimal thickness (μm) at bifurcation segments3 months post-procedure
Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)3 months post-procedure
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)3 months post-procedureCardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated TLR
Major Cardiac Adverse Events (MACE)3 months post-procedureCardiac death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent coronary artery bypass surgery, or target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Instent late-lumen loss by quantitative coronary analysis12 months post-procedure
Stent thrombosis1 months post-procedureStent thrombosis (all, definite, definite/probable, probable, possible) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria for acute, subacute, late, very late and cumulative stent thrombosis
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)3 months post-procedure

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYing-Chang Tung, MD
n12374@cgmh.org.tw886-3-3281200
Backup ContactChi-Jen Chang, MD
chijenformosa@gmail.com886-3-3281200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026