Skip to content

Diagnostic Accuracy of Handheld vs Traditional Ultrasound

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Portable, Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Device vs a Traditional Cart-Based Model

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05196776
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-01-19
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2023-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Image, Body

Brief summary

Patients receiving a point-of-care ultrasound will be randomized into a portable, handheld device or a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine to compare diagnostic capability.

Detailed description

Patients who require a point-of-care ultrasound examination of their kidneys, gallbladder, heart, lung, or aorta will be enrolled. Once enrolled, the patient will be randomized to receive the point-of-care ultrasound using a portable, handheld ultrasound or a traditional cart based model. The ultrasound examinations will be performed by emergency medicine post-graduate year 1-3 residents or an ultrasound fellow and reviewed by the supervising emergency medicine attending physicians credentialed in performing and interpreting point-of-care ultrasound. Based on the clinical presentation, the provider will perform one of the following ultrasounds: cardiac to assess ejection fraction ( \<50%, 30-50%, \<30%), lung to assess for presence or absence of B-lines, gallbladder to assess for the presence or absence of gallstones, renal to assess for the presence or absence of hydronephrosis, or aorta to assess for the presence or absence of an aneurysm. The diagnostic accuracy of the portable, handheld and the cart-based model will be assessed using the following as the diagnostic standard: cardiology-interpreted echocardiogram, radiology-interpreted ultrasound or computed tomography, or quality review of the point-of-care ultrasound by 3 ultrasound fellowship trained physicians.

Interventions

DEVICEPortable, handheld point-of-care ultrasound device

The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a handheld, portable device.

DEVICECart-based point-of-care ultrasound device

The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a traditional cart-based model.

Sponsors

Temple University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. English and Spanish-speaking patients, who require a gallbladder, cardiac, renal, aorta, or lung ultrasound based on the discretion of the treating physician.

Exclusion criteria

1. All other non-English and non-Spanish speaking patients 2. Vulnerable groups 3. Patients unable to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Accuracy1 dayThe primary outcome will be difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held and the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the cart-based model).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Image Quality by Expert Review1 dayUsing a Likert scale of 1-7 (1 = unable to assess image; 7 = highest quality), ultrasound fellowship-trained providers will assess the image quality of images obtained by each provide in the study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Portable, Handheld Device
Patients will receive a point-of-care ultrasound using a handheld, portable ultrasound device. Portable, handheld point-of-care ultrasound device: The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a handheld, portable device.
53
Traditional, Cart-based Ultrasound
Patients will receive a point-of-care ultrasound using a traditional, cart-based ultrasound machine. Cart-based point-of-care ultrasound device: The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a traditional cart-based model.
56
Total109

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTraditional, Cart-based UltrasoundTotalPortable, Handheld Device
Age, Continuous57 years59 years60 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 Participants109 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants61 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants48 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 540 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Diagnostic Accuracy

The primary outcome will be difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held and the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the cart-based model).

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Portable, Handheld DeviceDiagnostic Accuracy53 Participants
Traditional, Cart-based UltrasoundDiagnostic Accuracy56 Participants
Secondary

Image Quality by Expert Review

Using a Likert scale of 1-7 (1 = unable to assess image; 7 = highest quality), ultrasound fellowship-trained providers will assess the image quality of images obtained by each provide in the study.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Portable, Handheld DeviceImage Quality by Expert Review4 score on a scale
Traditional, Cart-based UltrasoundImage Quality by Expert Review5 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026