Image, Body
Conditions
Brief summary
Patients receiving a point-of-care ultrasound will be randomized into a portable, handheld device or a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine to compare diagnostic capability.
Detailed description
Patients who require a point-of-care ultrasound examination of their kidneys, gallbladder, heart, lung, or aorta will be enrolled. Once enrolled, the patient will be randomized to receive the point-of-care ultrasound using a portable, handheld ultrasound or a traditional cart based model. The ultrasound examinations will be performed by emergency medicine post-graduate year 1-3 residents or an ultrasound fellow and reviewed by the supervising emergency medicine attending physicians credentialed in performing and interpreting point-of-care ultrasound. Based on the clinical presentation, the provider will perform one of the following ultrasounds: cardiac to assess ejection fraction ( \<50%, 30-50%, \<30%), lung to assess for presence or absence of B-lines, gallbladder to assess for the presence or absence of gallstones, renal to assess for the presence or absence of hydronephrosis, or aorta to assess for the presence or absence of an aneurysm. The diagnostic accuracy of the portable, handheld and the cart-based model will be assessed using the following as the diagnostic standard: cardiology-interpreted echocardiogram, radiology-interpreted ultrasound or computed tomography, or quality review of the point-of-care ultrasound by 3 ultrasound fellowship trained physicians.
Interventions
The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a handheld, portable device.
The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a traditional cart-based model.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1\. English and Spanish-speaking patients, who require a gallbladder, cardiac, renal, aorta, or lung ultrasound based on the discretion of the treating physician.
Exclusion criteria
1. All other non-English and non-Spanish speaking patients 2. Vulnerable groups 3. Patients unable to consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Accuracy | 1 day | The primary outcome will be difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held and the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the cart-based model). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality by Expert Review | 1 day | Using a Likert scale of 1-7 (1 = unable to assess image; 7 = highest quality), ultrasound fellowship-trained providers will assess the image quality of images obtained by each provide in the study. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Portable, Handheld Device Patients will receive a point-of-care ultrasound using a handheld, portable ultrasound device.
Portable, handheld point-of-care ultrasound device: The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a handheld, portable device. | 53 |
| Traditional, Cart-based Ultrasound Patients will receive a point-of-care ultrasound using a traditional, cart-based ultrasound machine.
Cart-based point-of-care ultrasound device: The patient will have an ultrasound performed using a traditional cart-based model. | 56 |
| Total | 109 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Traditional, Cart-based Ultrasound | Total | Portable, Handheld Device |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57 years | 59 years | 60 years |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 56 Participants | 109 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants | 61 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 22 Participants | 48 Participants | 26 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 54 | 0 / 56 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 54 | 0 / 56 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 54 | 0 / 56 |
Outcome results
Diagnostic Accuracy
The primary outcome will be difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held and the percent of diagnostic accuracy of the cart-based model).
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Portable, Handheld Device | Diagnostic Accuracy | 53 Participants |
| Traditional, Cart-based Ultrasound | Diagnostic Accuracy | 56 Participants |
Image Quality by Expert Review
Using a Likert scale of 1-7 (1 = unable to assess image; 7 = highest quality), ultrasound fellowship-trained providers will assess the image quality of images obtained by each provide in the study.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Portable, Handheld Device | Image Quality by Expert Review | 4 score on a scale |
| Traditional, Cart-based Ultrasound | Image Quality by Expert Review | 5 score on a scale |