Skip to content

The Effect of Different Irrigation and Disinfection Methods on Post-operative Pain (PP)

The Effect of Different Irrigation and Disinfection Methods on Post-operative Pain in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05195021
Acronym
PP
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-01-18
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2021-07-30
Last updated
2022-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative Pain, Apical Periodontitis

Keywords

diode laser, EDDY, post-operative pain, sypmtomatic apical periodontitis

Brief summary

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine post-operative pain (PP) severity after conventional irrigation and sonic activation methods, with and without laser disinfection in mandibular molar teeth diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Methods: In total, 80 patients with symptomatic apical periodontitis were included in this randomized clinical study. There were four different irrigation and disinfection groups. In group 1, conventional irrigation only was applied. In group 2, EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany), a sonic irrigation activation system, was applied. In groups 3 and 4, irradiation with a 980-nm diode laser was performed, following irrigation with the conventional method (needle irrigation) and EDDY (VDW) irrigation system, respectively. PP was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The patients were instructed to record their PP using this scale 8, 24, 48 hours and 7 days post-procedure, in addition to their analgesic intake. A chi-square test, Fisher's exact chi-square test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test were used to assess qualitative data. Inter-group and intra-group parameters were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon's test at a significance level of p \< 0.05 (for both).

Interventions

DEVICEEDDY

EDDY (VDW) sonic irrigation activation system

DEVICEDiode Laser device

980-nm diode laser device

Conventional root canal irrigation with 31-guage side port needle

Sponsors

Biruni University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy adult patients aged between 18 and 65 years 2. Moderate to severe pain (4-10) according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) 3. Mandibular molar teeth diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis (a painful response during mastication and/or percussion or palpation)

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or lactation 2. Taking analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs 12 hours before the treatment 3. Taking antibiotics in the month prior to the treatment 4. Teeth with calcified root canals, greater than grade I mobility and a 4 mm pocket depth, non-restorable damage, occlusal trauma and previous root canal treatment or an open apex 5. Allergy to articaine or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative pain7 daysPost-operative pain levels in each group were assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) The pain levels were evaluated at 8, 24, 48 hours and 7 days post-procedure
Anaglesic intake7 daysAfter the operation nalgesic intake and time intervals were recorded

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026