Dental Implants, Surface Treatment
Conditions
Brief summary
Dental implants have become a widely accepted treatment modality for the replacement of missing single or multiple teeth in the recent years. In order to meet patients' needs for shorter treatment times and the necessity of dealing with more challenging clinical situations, implants and implant therapies have undergone continuous improvement to improve the function and longevity of the implants. Recently the constant search for improvements in modern implant have been focused on surface modifications so a new era of surface treatment have been showed up; the chemically modified hydrophilic surfaces.
Interventions
OTHERAqua alvim CM, neodent implant (Test)
Acqua, Hydrophilic sandblasted, and acid-etched dental implants
OTHERNeoporous alvim CM, neodent implant (Control)
Neoporous, Hydrophilic sandblasted, and acid-etched dental implants
Sponsors
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Missing mandibular posterior teeth. * Good oral hygiene (plaque index less than 10 %) * Good compliance to the treatment. * Participants are free from local or systemic disease * Willingness and ability to commit to follow-up placement. * Adequate bone height and width to accommodate implant placement and sufficient keratinzed mucosa. * At least 3months after tooth extraction * Sufficient interocclusal distance
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of persistent and unresolved infection in the implant site * Parafunctional habits. * Heavy Smokers. * Uncontrolled systemic disease that impedes bone healing
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in implant stability | at baseline and 6 months | The implant stability measurement was examined at the time of insertion of the implants (primary stability) and 6 months (secondary stability) for the two groups of patients using the resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) via the Osstell ISQ system |
| Change in bone density | at baseline and 6 months | Cone beam Computerized tomography was used to assess bone denisty |
| Change in ridge height | at baseline and 6 months | Cone beam Computerized tomography was used to assess ridge height |
| Biochemical assessment of bone formation | at 3 months | Done by measuring of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) as a bone marker by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed