Skip to content

Report of the Survival Outcomes of Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Definitive Radiotherapy in China

Report of the Survival Outcomes of Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Definitive Radiotherapy in China

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05194371
Enrollment
3000
Registered
2022-01-18
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2021-12-15
Last updated
2022-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Brief summary

In this study, data of esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy in 14 institutions from various provinces in China were evaluated to help strengthen confidence in anti-cancer, including rehabilitation, economic burden, and quality of life.

Interventions

RADIATIONdefinitive radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy

A total dose of radiation therapy should be more than 50Gy

Sponsors

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with esophageal cancer who received definitive radiotherapy (radiotherapy dose ≥50Gy) from 2015 to 2016 2. Age ≥ 18 3. The radiation field included primary esophageal tumor with or without lymph node metastasis

Exclusion criteria

1. Radiotherapy dose \< 50Gy 2. Palliative radiotherapy 3. The radiation field are metastatic areas, such as bone, brain, adrenal gland, isolated metastatic lymph nodes, etc

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival5 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to assess quality of life (QOL)5 yearThe EORTC QLQ-core 30 questionnaire is composed of multi-item scales and single-item measures including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, a global health status-QoL scale, and 6 single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than 1 scale. High scale score=higher response level; a high score for a functional scale=a healthy level of function, high score for the global health status/QoL=high quality of life but a high score for a symptom scale / item=high level of symptomatology/problems. The principle for scoring these scales: 1.) Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale = raw score. 2.) Linear transformation to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Results should be interpreted with caution as the numbers of patients with available data over time were limited, and because of high variances as evidenced by large standard deviations.
Costs of treatment5 yearFinancial burden, Whether medical insurance is affordable
Proportion of using chemotherapy or target therapy concurrently with radiotherapy2 monthMedication

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026