Cardiovascular Issues, ENT Issues, Eye Issues, Gastrointestinal Issues, Genitourinary Issues, Mental Health Issues, Musculoskeletal Issues, Neurologic Issues, Respiratory Issues
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the performance of the suggestions made by the WRA by comparing Ada's list of suggested conditions and advice level to usual care and a gold-standard in a Romanian clinical setting.
Detailed description
This pilot study investigates the performance of the Romanian version of Ada's Waiting Room Application in a clinical setting. The study will take place in a family doctor's practice in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. While waiting for their consultation with a family doctor, participants will complete an Ada assessment. The results of this assessment will not be available for viewing by the participants or the family practitioner. During and after consultation, the family practitioner will create two top 5 differential diagnoses list--one based on symptoms only and one based on physical examination and investigation results. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of Ada's differential diagnoses will be compared against the family practitioner's and a gold-standard.
Interventions
DEVICEAda WRA
The Ada WRA is a study-only device based on the Ada mobile app. The patient will use this device to answer questions regarding their symptoms but will not be given any feedback by the app.
Sponsors
Babes-Bolyai University
Botnar Foundation
Ada Health GmbH
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All patients under 60 years of age that enter the study sites and that are willing/able to provide consent will be included in the study, unless
Exclusion criteria
are met.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA | about 5 months to gather the data | Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA assessment evaluated against the gold standard differential diagnosis from the panel. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the family practitioner | about 5 months to gather the data | Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the family practitioner's differential diagnosis evaluated against the gold standard differential diagnosis from the panel. |
| Qualitative data on the chronology usability, usefulness and acceptance | about 3 months to gather the data | Gathered from surveys from patient, study nurse, and doctor |
Countries
Romania
Outcome results
None listed