Skip to content

Assessment of Histologic Prognostic Factors in Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma

Assessment of Histologic Prognostic Factors in Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05193006
Enrollment
300
Registered
2022-01-14
Start date
2021-12-28
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2022-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma

Keywords

prognostic factors, peritoneal malignant mesothelioma, mesothelioma

Brief summary

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm. The most common type, the epithelioid type, has been further divided into histological patterns of tubulo-papillary, acinar, adenomatoid, micropapillary, or solid. Its prognosis is improved by the use of a locoregional treatment combining extensive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), which increases survival up to 50 months. Histology is one of the most important prognostic variable that, forms the basis for treatment decisions. However, the prognostic of the epithelioid type varies greatly due to its tumor heterogeneity. It is therefore necessary to find prognostic factors of malignant epithelioid peritoneal mesothelioma in order to better define the therapeutic strategy. Among histological factors, solid growth, tumor necrosis, nuclear atypia, and mitotic count were found to be independent prognostic factors in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. However, in epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (EMPM), these factors were studied in small and heterogeneous series in terms of histological growth and definitions used for histological factors. The present large study was conducted to investigate the prognostic impact of several histologic factors in EMPM. Their prognosis impacts were assessed using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in EMPM.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

No intervention

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- peritoneal malignant mesothelioma

Exclusion criteria

* opposition to reuse personnal data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of pronostic impact of nuclear grade in comparison with combined grade in peritoneal malignant mesothelioma3 months to 4 yearsAssessment by the review of pathologists

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, India, Norway, Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026