Skip to content

Pain Perception Following Computer-Controlled vs. Conventional Dental Anesthesia

Pain Perception Following Computer-Controlled vs. Conventional Dental Anesthesia: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05192902
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-01-14
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Perception

Brief summary

This single-blind two-arm randomized control trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the pain perception during and following administration of dental local anaesthesia using two different systems; i.e. computer-controlled (CCLA) and conventional.

Detailed description

The administration of local anaesthesia (LA) is associated with pain, fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled LA (CCLA) aims to control the administration speed and reduce pain, fear and anxiety. This randomised control trial (RCT) aims to compare the pain perception after CCLA and conventional LA, and it uses dental students as both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as an additional operator of the LA.

Interventions

DEVICEComputer-controlled Local Anaesthesia (CCLA)

The computer-controlled local anesthetic injector Calaject®, (Rønvig Dental MFG, Daugaard, Denmark), which is designed to reduce the pain of performing local anaesthesia. The principle of this device is based on the fact that the less pressure and flow of a local anaesthetic injection, the less painful will be the procedure. Each device has an installed pressure sensor as well as a three-button display that allows choosing the most appropriate program in terms of different speeds and pressure. According to the anaesthesia technique, the manufacture recommends program I for intraligamentary and palatally injections, program II for infiltration and III for alveolar nerve block techniques. Conventional carpules and needles can be used in a pen-shaped part connecting to the main unit. The administration of the anaesthetic can be achieved using a foot control pedal which is adapted to the main unit, the speed of injection is related to acoustic signals.

DEVICEConventional Local Anaesthesia

Conventional dental local anaesthetic injections.

Sponsors

University of Giessen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Dental students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Giessen enrolled in the course of Local Anaesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain on Puncture (PoP)Within 2 hoursSelf-reported pain intensity on puncture using visual analogue scale (0 = no pain- 10 = the worse pain)
Pain during Delivery (PdD)Within 2 hoursSelf-reported pain intensity during delivery of the anaesthetic solution sing visual analogue scale (0 = no pain- 10 = the worse pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dental Anxiety (DA)Within 2 hoursAssessed by the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS)- Four questions survey with five possible answers. Each answer has a score: a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d = 4, e = 5 Total possible = 20. Anxiety rating: 9 - 12 = moderate anxiety/ 13 - 14 = high anxiety/ 15 - 20 = severe anxiety

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026