Skip to content

Patient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Different PEG-based Bowel Preparations- an Observational Study

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Different PEG-based Bowel Preparations- an Observational Study in Five Endoscopy Units in Sweden

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05192551
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2022-01-14
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2022-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Bowel-preparation

Keywords

Bowel-prep, Colonoscopy, Patient satisfaction

Brief summary

An multi-center, observational study where we compare the current standard, PEG-based bowel-prep to a (in Sweden) recently approved and introduced low volume (1 litre) PEG-based bowel-prep (Plenvu) in a clinical routine situation. The investigators will investigate if there are any differences in patient satisfaction and efficacy of the different bowel preparations

Detailed description

When performing Colonoscopy it is essential to use a bowel-prep that is highly effective and at the same time tolerable to intake for the patient to ensure that the patients intakes the recommended amount of the bowel-prep. This in order to be able to detect pathological findings in the mucosa. Currently in n Sweden the standard bowel-prep used in most endoscopy-units is high volume bowel preps (4 litres) in split dose. It can be difficult for the patient to intake the whole dose wish can lead to a sub-optimal bowel-cleansing. Recently, in Sweden, a new low-volume bowel-prep has been approved and introduced (Plenvu). This preparation, totally 1 litre of bowel prep given in a split dose is potentially easier for the patient to intake but it is essentially to ensure that the efficacy i at least as good as the current high dose preparation. In this study the investigators will therefore investigate patient satisfaction and efficacy of the different bowel preparations, comparing Plenvu with the current standard bowel-prep regime at the participating endoscopy units. Five endoscopy units participates in this study (Endoskopi City, Stockholm, Endoskopienheten i Malmö, Endoskopienheten i Linköping, Endoskopienheten i Örebro, Endoskopienheten Ersta sjukhus, Stockholm). In each endoscopy unit 100 consecutive patients will be prescribed Plenvu and another 100 consecutive patients will be prescribed the current standard bowel-prep at the actual unit. a total of 1000 patients will participate in the study. The currently used bowel-preps at the different endoscopy units are: Vistaprep, Laxabon and Movprep This is a study performed in a clinical context and no randomization is made. When arriving to the endoscopy unit patients are asked to participate in the study and if willing to participate patients will sign an informed consent-form. Before the colonoscopy the patients fills in a questionnaire about the bowel-prep experience concerning; smell, taste, overall experience (five graded scales) of the prep. In the questionnaire patients are also asked how much of the prescribed bowel-prep that have been digested and how much extra fluid the patient have been drinking during the preparation process. The patients are also asked about if they have been experienced nausea or been vomiting. After the colonoscopy, the gastroenterologist performing the endoscopy fills in the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) as a measure of how successful the bowel cleansing has been. Based on this information the investigators will compare patient satisfaction and efficacy of the bowel-cleansing in the group that has been prescribed Plenvu to the group that has been prescribed the endoscopy-units standard bowel-prep

Interventions

OTHERBowel-prep (Plenvu as experimental arm)

In this study we will investigate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of the,in Sweden recently approved and introduced low-dose, Peg-based bowel-prep Plenvu in comparsion with the standard bowel-preps used i today's clinical routine

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients over 18 admitted for colonoscopy at the participating endoscopy-units.

Exclusion criteria

* Renal failure or other contraindication for using low-dose bowel-preps * not speking or reading swedish * Need for a translator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction with bowel prepDay 1,When arriving to the endoscopy unit, Immediately before the endoscopyWhen arriving to the endoscopy unit the patients fills in a questionnaire about their bowel-prep experience concerning; smell, taste, overall experience (five graded scales) of the prep. The higher the number are the more satisfied the patient are with the current experience (smell, taste and overall experience. In the questionnaire they are also asked how much of the prescribed bowel-prep they have digested and how much extra fluid they have been drinking during the preparation process (0-4 litres).
Efficacy of the bowel prepDay 1,Directly after the colonoscopy,Immediately after the colonoscopy the gastroenterologist who has performed the investigation fills in the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale,a widely used scale describing how clean the bowel is in each of the three segment ant in total. Each segment is graded form 0-3 (3 perfect cleaning) and a sum-score of 0-9 (9 perfect clening) is calculated. The higher the number the better the cleansing are

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in the reported frequency of nausea and vomiting during the bowel-preparation processDay 1,When arriving to the endoscopy unit, Immediately before the endoscopyThe patients are asked if they have been experienced nausea or been vomiting (yes /no)

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026