Skip to content

Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients With Septic Shock

Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Clinical Study (VITAMIN TRIAL)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05192213
Enrollment
71
Registered
2022-01-14
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-09-19
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Septic Shock

Keywords

sepsis, septic shock, vitamin C, thiamine, ICU

Brief summary

A great interest exists regarding substances with an immunomodulatory effect for sepsis patients. Recent data have shown that intravenous vitamin C, together with corticosteroids and thiamine, could prevent progressive organ dysfunction and reduce vasopressor use in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Its effect on mortality, on the other hand, is yet to be demonstrated. The Vitamins study aims to conclusively determine, through its prospective, multicentre and double-blinded design including 1090 patients, wether Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone in combination can reduce mortality in patients with septic shock.

Detailed description

The global burden of sepsis is substantial with an estimated 15 to 19 million cases per year, most occurring in low-income countries. With recent advances in diagnosis and supportive treatment, the 28-day mortality from sepsis in high-income countries has decreased by about 25%; however, the mortality from septic shock still remains around 45%. A large volume of experimental data has shown that both corticosteroids and intravenous vitamin C attenuate the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, reduce the endothelial lesion characteristic of sepsis (reducing endothelial permeability and improving microcirculatory flow), increase the release of endogenous catecholamines and improve vasopressor reaction. In animal models, these effects resulted in reduced organ damage and increased survival. However, its effect on critically ill humans is controvert. Results of a retrospective study brought that the early use of intravenous vitamin C, together with corticosteroids and thiamine, can prevent progressive organ dysfunction and can reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. For this reason, the investigators propose a randomized, controlled, multicentre (mcRCT), pragmatic and feasibility study to investigate whether Vitamin C (1.5g 6 / 6h), along with thiamine (200 mg, 12 / 12h) and hydrocortisone (50 mg 6 / 6h) for 7 days can reduce all-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization.

Interventions

DRUGVitamin C

Patients will be allocated in a 1: 1 ratio to the treatment group, receiving intravenous Vitamin C (1.5 g every 6 hours), Thiamine (200 mg every 12 hours) and Hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 hours) for 7 days

OTHERPlacebo

Patients will receive 2 placebos (every 6 hours and every 12 hours) + Hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 hours) for 7 days.

Sponsors

PROADI-SUS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ministry of Health, Brazil
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Hospital Sirio-Libanes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Above 18 years of age * Sepsis of any background * Vasopressor-dependent sepsis for at least 2 hours and vasopressor dose ≥ 0.25 µg / kg / min

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy; * Requests for DNR (do not resuscitate) / DNI (do not intubate); * Death is considered imminent or inevitable during this hospitalization and the attending physician, patient or substitute decision maker is not committed to active treatment; * Patients with acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, active gastrointestinal bleeding, burn or trauma at admission; * Patients with known HIV infection; * Patients with known glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6PD) deficiency; * Patients with septic shock transferred from another ICU or hospital with characteristics of septic shock for\> 12 hours; * Patients with septic shock characteristics for\> 12 hours; * Patients with a known history of oxalate nephropathy; * Patients with short bowel syndrome or severe known fat malabsorption; * Patients with acute beriberi disease; * Patients with acute Wernicke's encephalopathy; * Patients with known malaria; * Patients with known or suspected scurvy; * Patients with known or suspected Addison's disease; * Patients with known Cushing's disease; * Physician expects to prescribe or the patient has previously used (less than 15 days) systemic glucocorticoids for an indication other than septic shock (not including nebulized or inhaled corticosteroids), including the use of glucocorticoids for COVID-19; * The patient is receiving treatment for systemic fungal infection or has documented Strongyloides infection at the time of randomization; * Patient with known chronic iron overload due to iron storage and other diseases; * Patient previously enrolled in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
28-day Mortality28 daysMortality by all causes at 28 days after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of support28 daysDuration of use of vasoactive drugs, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy
90-day Mortality90 daysMortality by all causes at 90 days after randomization
Delta SOFA72 hoursChange in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, comparing SOFA score at 72 hours and SOFA score at randomisation. Range 0-24. Lower SOFA scores represent better outcome.
Quality of life assessment6 monthsDifference in quality of life assessment using the EQ-5D questionnaire, from EuroQol Group. The questionnaire will be applied during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and after 6 months. Range 0-1, with 0 and 1 corresponding to death and full health, respectively. This will be applied in 30% of research sample.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events28 daysDescriptive analysis of adverse events related to the study drugs, reported as incidence of the most recurrent events during the study period.
Changes in Inflammatory MarkersUp to 96 hours of randomisationAnalysis of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein collected at randomisation, after 48h and 96h after randomisation. This will be applied in 30% of research sample.
Duration of hospital stayUntil hospital discharge or up to 90 days of randomisationDuration of hospital stay

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026